Saumitra Goyal1, Nadia Matias2, Vivek Pandey3, Kiran Acharya3. 1. Kasturba Medical College, Orthopaedics, Manipal, India. saumitragoyal@gmail.com. 2. Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India. 3. Kasturba Medical College, Orthopaedics, Manipal, India.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cross-sectional diameter of 7 mm or more of graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is arguably the single most important factor determining the success of the operation. Pre-operative anthropometric parameters have been reported to correlate with diameter of quadrupled hamstring graft, which is the most popular graft choice today. We conducted this prospective study to determine the value of some anthropometric measurements to predict the length of harvested semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and quadrupled hamstring graft diameter. We also assessed the reliability of the mathematical equation in accurately predicting the graft diameter. METHODS: Height, weight, BMI and thigh length of 160 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction was measured before surgery. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis length of harvested semitendinous and gracilis tendons along with quadrupled graft diameter were correlated to height, weight, BMI and thigh length. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent had graft diameter of 7 mm or more. Height and thigh length were found to be most strongly correlating to both the length of harvested tendons and the quadrupled graft diameter (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.25-0.39). Patients with height less than 147 cm were found to be at highest risk for inadequate graft diameter (less than 7 mm). Although the anthropometric parameters were found to be significantly related to height and thigh length, the strength of association is moderate. The mathematical equation for prediction of graft diameter using height was found to inaccurately over-predict the graft diameter in 33.1 % of cases, assessed using Bland-Altman plot. CONCLUSION: Anthropometric parameters, especially height and thigh length, can serve as a guide to plan hamstring graft diameter and length before ACL reconstruction. But, it is not advisable to rely on mathematical equations for absolute values of graft parameters as there is risk of over-estimating hamstring length or graft thickness.
PURPOSE: Cross-sectional diameter of 7 mm or more of graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is arguably the single most important factor determining the success of the operation. Pre-operative anthropometric parameters have been reported to correlate with diameter of quadrupled hamstring graft, which is the most popular graft choice today. We conducted this prospective study to determine the value of some anthropometric measurements to predict the length of harvested semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and quadrupled hamstring graft diameter. We also assessed the reliability of the mathematical equation in accurately predicting the graft diameter. METHODS: Height, weight, BMI and thigh length of 160 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction was measured before surgery. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis length of harvested semitendinous and gracilis tendons along with quadrupled graft diameter were correlated to height, weight, BMI and thigh length. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent had graft diameter of 7 mm or more. Height and thigh length were found to be most strongly correlating to both the length of harvested tendons and the quadrupled graft diameter (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.25-0.39). Patients with height less than 147 cm were found to be at highest risk for inadequate graft diameter (less than 7 mm). Although the anthropometric parameters were found to be significantly related to height and thigh length, the strength of association is moderate. The mathematical equation for prediction of graft diameter using height was found to inaccurately over-predict the graft diameter in 33.1 % of cases, assessed using Bland-Altman plot. CONCLUSION: Anthropometric parameters, especially height and thigh length, can serve as a guide to plan hamstring graft diameter and length before ACL reconstruction. But, it is not advisable to rely on mathematical equations for absolute values of graft parameters as there is risk of over-estimating hamstring length or graft thickness.
Authors: Juan Ignacio Erquicia; Pablo Eduardo Gelber; Jose Luis Doreste; Xavier Pelfort; Ferran Abat; Juan Carlos Monllau Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Camilo Partezani Helito; Marcelo Batista Bonadio; Marco Kawamura Demange; Roberto Freire da Mota e Albuquerque; José Ricardo Pécora; Gilberto Luis Camanho; Fabio Janson Angelini Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Brent A Bickel; T Ty Fowler; John G Mowbray; Brent Adler; Kevin Klingele; Gary Phillips Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2008-09-13 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Jeffrey M Tuman; David R Diduch; L Joseph Rubino; Joshua A Baumfeld; Henry S Nguyen; Joseph M Hart Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2007-07-20 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Etienne Cavaignac; Regis Pailhé; Nicolas Reina; Jérôme Murgier; Jean Michel Laffosse; Philippe Chiron; Pascal Swider Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Katharine Hollnagel; Brent M Johnson; Kelley K Whitmer; Andrew Hanna; Thomas K Miller Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Clayton T Hodges; Trevor J Shelton; Cyrus P Bateni; Stephen S Henrichon; Alton W Skaggs; Robert D Boutin; Cassandra A Lee; Brian M Haus; Richard A Marder Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Luis Fernando Z Funchal; Rafael Ortiz; Andrew Jimenez; Gabriella Di Giunta Funchal; Moises Cohen; Diego Costa Astur Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-03-10