Relevance of dietary protein concentration and quality as risk factors for the formation of calcium oxalate stones in cats.

The role of dietary protein for the development of feline calcium oxalate (CaOx) uroliths has not been conclusively clarified. The present study evaluated the effects of a varying dietary protein concentration and quality on critical indices for the formation of CaOx uroliths. Three diets with a high protein quality (10-11 % greaves meal/diet) and a varying crude protein (CP) concentration (35, 44 and 57 % in DM) were compared. Additionally, the 57 % CP diet was compared with a fourth diet that had a similar CP concentration (55 % in DM), but a lower protein quality (34 % greaves meal/diet). The Ca and oxalate (Ox) concentrations were similar in all diets. A group of eight cats received the same diet at the same time. Each feeding period was divided into a 21 d adaptation period and a 7 d sampling period to collect urine. There were increases in urinary volume, urinary Ca concentrations, renal Ca and Ox excretion and urinary relative supersaturation (RSS) with CaOx with increasing dietary protein concentrations. Urinary pH ranged between 6·34 and 6·66 among all groups, with no unidirectional effect of dietary protein. Lower renal Ca excretion was observed when feeding the diet with the lower protein quality, however, the underlying mechanism needs further evaluation. In conclusion, although the observed higher urinary volume is beneficial, the increase in urinary Ca concentrations, renal Ca and Ox excretion and urinary RSS CaOx associated with a high-protein diet may be critical for the development of CaOx uroliths in cats.

The role of dietary protein for the developn class="Species">ment of n class="Chemical">calcium oxalate (CaOx) uroliths in cats has not been conclusively clarified. In human subjects, an increased renal oxalate (Ox) excretion has been found to be associated with a higher protein intake(); however, contrary results have been observed in cats(,). Up to now, the reasons for these contradicting effects in human subjects and cats remain unclear. Zentek & Schulz() hypothesised that the observed decrease in urinary Ox concentrations when feeding the high-protein (but low-fat) diets compared with the low-protein (but high-fat) diets to the cats could possibly not result from the protein, but from the fat concentration of the diets. Dijcker et al.() also observed the highest urinary Ox concentrations in cats when feeding a high-fat diet compared with a high-protein and high-carbohydrate diet. Thus, one explanation for the contradicting effects of dietary protein on the urinary Ox concentration and excretion reported in human subjects and cats could be the variation in the fat concentrations of the experimental diets. This hypothesis is supported by findings in human subjects, where a high dietary fat intake has been identified to increase renal Ox excretion(,).

Besides urinary n class="Chemical">Ox conpan>centrationpan> and excretionpan>, further factors have been disn class="Chemical">cussed as potential risk factors for the development of CaOx uroliths in cats, including urinary volume, urinary pH and urinary Ca concentration and excretion. In general, a greater urinary volume lowers the total concentrations of Ca and Ox in the urine(), assuming that the renal excretion of Ca and Ox remains unchanged. Since increasing dietary protein concentrations were associated with increased water intake and a higher urinary volume in adult cats(,) and kittens(), a moderate- or high-protein diet is considered to be beneficial in the treatment of cats with uroliths().

A urinary pH < 6·29 is assumed to enhance the risk for the formation of n class="Chemical">CaOx uroliths inpan> n class="Species">cats(,), and the dietary protein concentration and source can modulate the pH of the urine. In one study, a high-protein diet (55 % crude protein (CP) on a DM basis), based on maize gluten meal, fish meal and soyabean meal, led to a urinary pH of 6·63 in cats, while feeding a moderate-protein diet (29 % CP on a DM basis) based on the same protein sources resulted in an alkaline urinary pH of 7·25(). Another study in cats found also an alkaline urinary pH (>7) when feeding diets with moderate protein concentrations (29–32 % CP on a DM basis) and meat meal, chicken meal or maize gluten meal as protein sources(). However, the highest urinary pH (7·99) was found when feeding the diet based on meat meal, and the lowest (7·08) when feeding the diet with maize gluten meal(). In human subjects, especially a high intake of animal protein has been shown to result in an acid load().

Interestingly, little is known about the impact of dietary protein concentration on n class="Disease">renal Ca excretion inpan> n class="Species">cats. For human subjects, a high intake of animal protein or particularly of sulfur-containing amino acids can be considered to be critical for the formation of CaOx uroliths, since an increased renal Ca excretion is associated(,). This increase is often explained to be a result of an acid load, derived from the oxidation of sulfur-containing amino acids to sulfuric acid and the associated release of protons(). Moreover, the acid load does not only increase the renal excretion of Ca, but also of uric acid, and decreases the renal excretion of citrate, all risk factors for the development of CaOx uroliths(). However, other authors found that the acid load may not solely be the reason for the increased renal Ca excretion associated with a high protein intake in human subjects(,). In these studies, an increase in renal Ca excretion was observed even when adding the alkalising potassium bicarbonate or potassium citrate to a high-protein diet. Therefore, other factors may contribute to the increased renal Ca excretion, for instance a higher intestinal Ca absorption(,). Moreover, since protein intake may modulate the secretion of PG(), an enhanced renal excretion of PGE2 could potentially regulate renal Ca excretion via the stimulation of calcitriol synthesis(,).

Considering the sparse results on the relevance of dietary protein for the formation of CaOx uroliths inpan> n class="Species">cats, the present study aimed to determine the effects of increasing dietary protein concentrations on feline urine composition in more detail. In addition, the impact of dietary protein quality has not been studied intensively. In one study by Zentek & Schulz(), the highest urinary Ox concentrations in cats were observed when feeding a low-protein diet (23 % CP on a DM basis) based on collagen tissue when compared with low- and high-protein diets (22–64 % CP on a DM basis) based on horse meat or soya protein isolate. This effect could possibly be explained by the higher concentrations of hydroxyproline and glycine in collagen tissue(), which are precursors for endogenous Ox synthesis(,,). Surprisingly, in the Zentek & Schulz study(), urinary Ox concentrations were lower when feeding a high-protein diet (78 % CP on a DM basis) based on collagen tissue when compared with the low-protein diet with collagen tissue as the protein source. Thus, the role of dietary protein quality for the formation of CaOx uroliths in cats needs further evaluation. The present study compared two diets with varying protein quality, characterised by different amounts of collagen-rich greaves meal in the diets. In contrast to the previous study(), the diets had comparable protein concentrations that allowed us to focus on the impact of protein quality as a single dietary factor on urine composition of cats.

Materials and methods

Animal study

The animal study was approved by the Animal Welfare Committee (Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales, Berlin, Germany, G 0004/08). A group of eight adult n class="Species">cats (European shorthair, four male, four n class="Chemical">female, aged 12–25 months) was included in the study. In total, four feeding periods were carried out, and each feeding period was divided into a 21 d adaptation period and a 7 d sampling period to allow for total urine and faeces collection. The cats were housed in groups (adaptation period) or individually (sampling period) in a room where a light (12 h light–12 h darkness) and temperature (20°C) regimen was kept constant at all times. All cats received socialisation throughout the study. The cats were fed once daily in the morning, while the constancy of body weight (BW) and the individual energy requirements of the cats were considered(). Water was provided ad libitum; however, since the water bowl for each cat was filled with 200 ml water per d, a measurement of the daily water intake was possible. The individual daily feed and water intake of the cats was documented during each sampling period.

Diets, water and proximate analysis

Four extruded dry diets, varying in protein concentration and quality, were ofn class="Chemical">fered inpan> four feeding periods. All cats were fed the same experimental diet at the same time (four-period, four-treatment parallel cross-over design).

The first three diets (HQ 35 %, HQ 44 % and HQ 57 %) were characterised by high protein quality (HQ) and difn class="Chemical">fered inpan> CP concentration (35, 44 and 57 % on a n class="Disease">DM basis). The fourth diet (LQ 55 %) had a comparable CP concentration (55 % on a DM basis) as diet HQ 57 %, but lower protein quality (LQ). Protein quality was based on the amount of collagen-rich ingredients included in the experimental diets, which was 11 % greaves meal in diet HQ 57 % and 34 % greaves meal in diet LQ 55 %. The amount of greaves meal in the diets HQ 35 % and HQ 44 % was 10 % and therefore comparable with diet HQ 57 %.

All diets were formulated to fulfil the nutrient requiren class="Species">ments of adult n class="Species">cats, according to the National Research Council(). The dietary components were selected to be low in Ox and the average dietary Ox concentrations were determined at 7 mg/100 g on a DM basis, representing an average value obtained from analysis of three diets. The Ca concentrations were also comparable in all diets (11·0–12·2 g/kg DM). The ingredients of the experimental diets and the results of the proximate analysis of the diets are presented in the Tables 1 and 2. The analysis was performed as described elsewhere(). In brief, the concentrations of crude nutrients were measured according to the directions of the Weende analysis of feed(), with a modified method for the determination of crude fat(). The mineral concentrations in the diets were measured as described below for minerals in the faeces of the cats. Ox concentrations in the diets were analysed using a commercial oxalate oxidase assay (EnzytecTM Oxalsäure, no. E2100; R-Biopharm AG). For each feed sample, 1 g was mixed with 4 ml hydrochloric acid (5 m) for 15 min (Multi Reax; Heidolph Instruments GmbH & Co.) and subsequently heated at 60°C for 3 h (Haake C10-W13; Thermo Scientific). The samples were centrifuged at 2663 and room temperature for 15 min (Heraeus Labofuge 400R; Thermo Scientific), and the aqueous phase was filtered (SCFA Syringe Filter, 0·2 µm; Thermo Scientific). A quantity of 500 µl of the filtered aqueous phase was adjusted to a pH of 2·9–3·1, using either hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide. Subsequently, the samples were centrifuged at 17 000 and room temperature for 10 min (Heraeus Fresco 17 Centrifuge; Thermo Scientific). Then 10 µl of the supernatant fraction and 200 µl of Reagent 1 (Buffer, EnzytecTM; R-Biopharm AG) were mixed for 1 min at 1050 rpm and 37°C on an orbital shaker (BioShake iQ; Analytic Jena). After incubation for 5 min at 37°C and 590 nm (TECAN infinite M200 PRO; Tecan Group Ltd), 20 µl of Reagent 2 (oxalate oxidase, EnzytecTM; R-Biopharm) were added. The samples were mixed for 1 min at 1050 rpm and 37°C on an orbital shaker (BioShake iQ; Analytic Jena) and subsequently incubated at 37°C and 590 nm (TECAN infinite M200 PRO; Tecan Group Ltd). After 15 min, extinctions were measured (TECAN infinite M200 PRO; Tecan Group Ltd), and Ox concentrations were calculated according to the instructions of the manufacturer (EnzytecTM; R-Biopharm).

Table 1.

Ingredients (%) of the experimental diets*

	High quality			Low quality
Analysed composition	HQ 35 %	HQ 44 %	HQ 57 %	LQ 55 %
Maize	44·2	32·7	9·43	19·2
Poultry meal	17·2	27·5	33·7	31·5
Soya protein	0·00	0·00	12·7	0·00
Maize gluten	9·51	11·6	17·0	0·00
Greaves meal	9·51	9·64	11·3	33·6
Pig fat	7·45	6·59	9·23	8·92
Rice gluten	2·85	2·89	0·00	0·00
Dried beet pulp	1·90	1·93	0·00	0·00
Digest and antioxidants	3·93	3·83	3·85	3·85
Salt	0·91	0·86	0·90	0·58
Yeast	0·95	0·96	0·94	0·96
Marigold meal	0·03	0·03	0·03	0·03
Minerals and vitamins	1·56	1·47	0·92	1·36

HQ 35 %, high protein quality diet with 35 % crude protein content; HQ 44 %, high protein quality diet with 44 % crude protein content; HQ 57 %, high protein quality diet with 57 % crude protein content; LQ 55 %, low protein quality diet with 55 % crude protein content.

The quality differed depending on the amounts of collagen tissue in the diets: HQ 35 % and HQ 44 %, 10 % greaves meal; HQ 57 %, 11 % greaves meal; LQ 55 %, 34 % greaves meal.

Table 2.

Nutrient analysis of the experimental diets*

	High quality			Low quality
Analysed composition	HQ 35 %	HQ 44 %	HQ 57 %	LQ 55 %
DM (g/kg)	904	919	923	928
Crude protein (g/kg DM)	347	438	574	547
Crude fat (g/kg DM)	115	124	171	183
Crude fibre (g/kg DM)	11·1	22·8	10·8	11·9
Crude ash (g/kg DM)	72·8	67·7	71·4	72·3
Ca (g/kg DM)	12·2	11·3	11·4	11·0
P (g/kg DM)	11·3	11·0	12·3	11·4
Na (g/kg DM)	7·40	6·51	7·52	7·72
K (g/kg DM)	6·30	5·24	7·36	6·97
Cl (g/kg DM)	11·6	9·50	8·34	10·7
Mg (g/kg DM)	1·08	1·12	1·36	0·89
ME (MJ/kg DM)†	17·0	17·2	18·6	18·8
NFE (g/kg DM)‡	454	348	173	186

HQ 35 %, high protein quality diet with 35 % crude protein content; HQ 44 %, high protein quality diet with 44 % crude protein content; HQ 57 %, high protein quality diet with 57 % crude protein content; LQ 55 %, low protein quality diet with 55 % crude protein content; ME, metabolisable energy; NFE, N-free extracts.

The quality differed depending on the amounts of collagen tissue in the diets: HQ 35 % and HQ 44 %, 10 % greaves meal; HQ 57 %, 11 % greaves meal; LQ 55 %, 34 % greaves meal.

† Calculated according to the National Research Council() using the four-step calculation with due regard to the crude fibre concentrations of the diets.

‡ Calculated as follows: NFE = DM – (crude ash + crude protein + crude fat + crude fibre).

Ingredients (%) of the experin class="Species">mental diets*

HQ 35 %, high protein quality diet with 35 % crude protein content; HQ 44 %, high protein quality diet with 44 % crude protein content; HQ 57 %, high protein quality diet with 57 % crude protein content; n class="Chemical">LQ 55 %, low proteinpan> quality diet with 55 % crude proteinpan> content.

The quality difn class="Chemical">fered dependinpan>g on the amounts of collagen tissue inpan> the diets: HQ 35 % and HQ 44 %, 10 % greaves meal; HQ 57 %, 11 % greaves meal; n class="Chemical">LQ 55 %, 34 % greaves meal.

n class="Chemical">Nutrient analysis of the experin class="Species">mental diets*

HQ 35 %, high protein quality diet with 35 % crude protein content; HQ 44 %, high protein quality diet with 44 % crude protein content; HQ 57 %, high protein quality diet with 57 % crude protein content; n class="Chemical">LQ 55 %, low proteinpan> quality diet with 55 % crude proteinpan> content; ME, metabolisable energy; n class="Chemical">NFE, N-free extracts.

The quality difn class="Chemical">fered dependinpan>g on the amounts of collagen tissue inpan> the diets: HQ 35 % and HQ 44 %, 10 % greaves meal; HQ 57 %, 11 % greaves meal; n class="Chemical">LQ 55 %, 34 % greaves meal.

† Caln class="Chemical">culated accordinpan>g to the n class="Chemical">National Research Council() using the four-step calculation with due regard to the crude fibre concentrations of the diets.

‡ Caln class="Chemical">culated as follows: n class="Chemical">NFE = DM – (crude ash + crude protein + crude fat + crude fibre).

For the analysis of n class="Chemical">drinking water, the n class="Chemical">water sample was mixed with a specific buffer, where the buffer varied depending on the analysed minerals. For the measurement of Zn and Cu, 1 ml water was mixed with 1 ml of a buffer that was based on 10 ml HCl (37 %) and 990 ml ultra-pure water. For the measurement of Ca concentration, 0·05 ml of the water sample and 4·95 ml of a buffer (10 ml HCl (37 %), 20 ml caesium chloride–lanthanum chloride buffer, 970 ml ultra-pure water) were mixed. The caesium chloride buffer was based on 10 g caesium chloride/l and 100 g lanthanum/l (Merck KGaA). For the determination of Na concentration in the water, 0·025 ml of the water sample and 4·975 ml of a buffer (10 ml HCl (37 %), 50 ml caesium chloride–lanthanum chloride buffer, 940 ml ultra-pure water) were mixed. The sample for the K measurement was prepared using 0·05 ml water and 4·95 ml of a buffer (10 ml HCl (37 %), 50 ml caesium chloride–lanthanum chloride buffer, 940 ml ultra-pure water). For the determination of Mg concentration, 1 ml of the water sample and 4 ml of a buffer (10 ml HCl (37 %), 1 g potassium chloride, 990 ml ultra-pure water) were mixed. Fe concentration was measured using a mixture of 1 ml water and 1 ml of a buffer (10 ml HCl (37 %), 1 g potassium chloride, 990 ml ultra-pure water).

The concentrations of n class="Chemical">Zn, n class="Chemical">Cu, Ca, Na, K, Mg and Fe in the prepared water samples were measured using atomic absorption spectrometry. For this, a flame atomic absorption spectrometer (type contra 700) with an autosampler (AS 52S) was used (Analytik Jena AG). For the analysis of P concentration in the water, 0·5 ml of the water sample, 1·5 ml ultra-pure water and 0·5 ml of colour reagent (nitro-vanadate–molybdate solution) were mixed. After 10 min, P concentration was measured spectrophotometrically(). The extinctions were determined with an Ultrospec 2100 pro Classic (Pharmacia Biotech) at a wavelength of 436 nm.

Collection, preparation and analysis of the urine and faeces

During each sampling period, purpose-built cat litter boxes were used with plastic pellets as litter and conpan>nected urinpan>e collectionpan> conpan>tainpan>ers to separate the urinpan>e from the faeces. Each urinpan>e collectionpan> conpan>tainpan>er was provided with onpan>e drop of n class="Chemical">chlorhexidine digluconate to prevent bacterial growth in the urine. The cat litter boxes were checked for fresh urine and faeces three times per d, and the samples were stored at 4°C until the evening. Urinary pH was measured in the evening with the Seven Multi pH meter (Mettler-Toledo GmbH). After pH measurement, all urine and faeces samples of each day were stored at –80°C (urine) or –20°C (faeces) until further analysis. Sample preparation and analysis were as described elsewhere(). In short, the concentrations of urinary anions (sulfate and phosphate as major anions; Ox and citrate as minor anions) were measured with an ion exchange HPLC system (Dionex DX-500; Dionex Corp.), and also the concentrations of urinary cations (Na and K as major cations; Mg and Ca as minor cations) (Dionex DX-120). Data on the concentrations of urinary anions and cations were analysed using Chromeleon Client, version 6.80 SP2 (Dionex Corp.). The Cl concentrations in the faeces of the cats were determined using an ion exchange HPLC system (Dionex DX-500; Dionex Corp.). Faecal P concentrations were measured spectrophotometrically() (Ultrospec 2000, Pharmacia Biotech), and the concentrations of Ca, Na, K and Mg in the faeces were measured using atomic absorption spectrometry (flame atomic absorption spectrometer type vario 6 with an autosampler AS 52; Analytik Jena AG). The urinary CaOx relative supersaturation (RSS CaOx) was calculated using the Supersat Program().

Renal and faecal excretion, apparent digestibility and retention

n class="Disease">Renal excretion of the anions and cations was caln class="Chemical">culated as follows:

n class="Disease">Renal excretion (n class="Chemical">mg/kg BW per d) = (anion or cation concentration in the urine (mg/ml) × total urinary volume (ml/d))/BW (kg).

Faecal excretion of the minerals was caln class="Chemical">culated as follows:

Faecal excretion (n class="Chemical">mg/kg BW per d) = (minpan>eral concentration inpan> the faeces (n class="Chemical">mg/g DM) × total amount of faeces (g DM/d))/BW (kg).

The apparent digestibility of the minerals was caln class="Chemical">culated with:

Apparent digestibility (%) = (mineral intake (n class="Chemical">mg/d) – faecal minpan>eral excretion (n class="Chemical">mg/d))/mineral intake (mg/d) × 100.

Apparent digestibility of CP was caln class="Chemical">culated by analogy.

Mineral retention was caln class="Chemical">culated as follows:

Mineral retention (n class="Chemical">mg/d) = minpan>eral inpan>take (n class="Chemical">mg/d) – renal mineral excretion (mg/d) – faecal mineral excretion (mg/d).

Statistical analysis

For the statistical analysis, the impact of a varying dietary protein concentration (diets HQ 35 %, HQ 44 %, HQ 57 %) and of a varying dietary protein quality (diet HQ 57 % v. diet n class="Chemical">LQ 55 %) was separately evaluated. For this, SPSS 15 (SPSS Inc.) was used. A repeated-measures An class="Chemical">NOVA was performed (fixed factor protein concentration or protein quality), and within-subject contrasts (simple contrasts; protein concentration = three levels and protein quality = two levels; three tests per parameter for protein concentration and one test per parameter for protein quality) were considered for the detection of group differences. The data are presented in tables as mean values with their standard errors. Significant differences (P ≤ 0·05) among groups (separate for the comparisons of dietary protein concentration and dietary protein quality) are shown.

Results

Composition of drinking water

The analysed mineral concentrations in the n class="Chemical">drinking water were: 106 n class="Chemical">mg Ca/l, 37·8 mg Na/l, 10·9 mg K/l, 8·80 mg Mg/l, 0·58 mg Cu/l, 0·03 mg Zn/l and 0·01 mg Fe/l. The P concentration in the water was below the detection limit (1·33 mg/l).

Animal health, body weight, feed and water intake, urinary volume and urinary pH

All n class="Species">cats were healthy throughout the study. The BW of the n class="Species">cats did not differ when receiving diets with different protein quality (HQ 57 % v. LQ 55 %), and showed small variations with differing dietary protein concentrations (HQ 35 %, HQ 44 %, HQ 57 %) (Table 3). The varying dietary protein quality had no impact on daily feed and water intake, urinary volume or urinary pH (Table 3). In contrast, increasing concentrations of dietary protein led to an increased urinary volume and a higher feed intake. Urinary pH was the lowest (6·34) after feeding diet HQ 44 % when compared with the diets HQ 35 % (6·66) and HQ 57 % (6·61).

Table 3.

Body weight (BW), feed and water intake, urinary volume, urinary pH and urinary relative supersaturation with calcium oxalate (RSS CaOx) of cats fed a diet with a varying protein concentration and quality (Mean values with their standard errors; n 8 per diet)

	Protein concentration				Protein quality*
	HQ 35 %	HQ 44 %	HQ 57 %	sem	HQ 57 %	LQ 55 %	sem
BW (kg)	4·07b	3·99a	4·17b	0·30	4·17	4·22	0·36
Feed intake (g DM/kg BW per d)	13·3a	13·3a,b	16·0b	0·83	16·0	13·4	1·03
Water intake (ml/kg BW per d)	29·8	29·8	35·4	1·79	35·4	32·5	1·77
Urinary volume (ml/kg BW per d)	9·86a	10·9a	17·0b	1·03	17·0	14·7	1·05
Urinary pH	6·66b	6·34a	6·61b	0·04	6·61	6·58	0·02
Urinary RSS CaOx	8·24a	10·9b	11·2b	0·80	11·2	10·1	0·94

HQ 35 %, high protein quality diet with 35 % crude protein content; HQ 44 %, high protein quality diet with 44 % crude protein content; HQ 57 %, high protein quality diet with 57 % crude protein content; LQ 55 %, low protein quality diet with 55 % crude protein content.

a,b Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P ≤ 0·05).

* Protein quality differed depending on the amounts of greaves meal in the diets: HQ 35 % and HQ 44 %, 10 % greaves meal; HQ 57 %, 11 % greaves meal; LQ 55 %, 34 % greaves meal.

Body weight (BW), n class="Chemical">feed and n class="Chemical">water intake, urinary volume, urinary pH and urinary relative supersaturation with calcium oxalate (RSS CaOx) of cats fed a diet with a varying protein concentration and quality (Mean values with their standard errors; n 8 per diet)

HQ 35 %, high protein quality diet with 35 % crude protein content; HQ 44 %, high protein quality diet with 44 % crude protein content; HQ 57 %, high protein quality diet with 57 % crude protein content; n class="Chemical">LQ 55 %, low proteinpan> quality diet with 55 % crude proteinpan> content.

a,b Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly difn class="Chemical">ferent (P ≤ 0·05).

* Protein quality difn class="Chemical">fered dependinpan>g on the amounts of greaves meal inpan> the diets: HQ 35 % and HQ 44 %, 10 % greaves meal; HQ 57 %, 11 % greaves meal; n class="Chemical">LQ 55 %, 34 % greaves meal.

Effect of dietary protein concentration

Impact on urinary concentration and excretion of calcium and oxalate and the urinary relative supersaturation with calcium oxalate

Urinary Ca concentrations and n class="Disease">renal Ca excretion inpan>creased with inpan>creasinpan>g dietary proteinpan> conpan>centrationpan>s (Table 4). Urinpan>ary n class="Chemical">Ox concentration was the lowest after feeding diet HQ 57 % when compared with the diets HQ 35 % and HQ 44 %; however, calculating renal Ox excretion demonstrated an increase from 1·08 mg/kg BW per d (HQ 35 %) to 1·68 mg/kg BW per d (HQ 57 %). Urinary RSS CaOx also increased with increasing protein concentrations in the diets, reaching values between 8·24 (HQ 35 %) and 11·2 (HQ 57 %) (Table 3).

Table 4.

Urinary concentration and renal excretion of anions and cations of cats fed a diet with a varying protein concentration and quality (Mean values with their standard errors; n 8 per diet)

	Protein concentration				Protein quality†
	HQ 35 %	HQ 44 %	HQ 57 %	sem	HQ 57 %	LQ 55 %	sem
Urinary concentration (mg/l)
Ca	60·5a	59·4a	78·3b	4·32	78·3	68·0	5·16
P	2880	2658	2608	178	2608	2557	207
Mg	33·0a	47·6b	29·9a	3·08	29·9	25·0	3·25
K	2165b	2009b	1773a	107	1773	1994	124
Na	2443b	1990a,b	1947a	139	1947	2162	181
Ox	118b	135b	102a	7·53	102	104	5·72
Sulfate	3277	3664	3548	293	3548	2911*	317
Citrate	148b	65·0a	80·8a	16·8	80·8	67·0	12·2
Renal excretion (mg/kg BW per d)
Ca	0·59a	0·69a	1·32b	0·10	1·32	0·98*	0·12
P	27·3a	30·3a,b	43·8b	3·06	43·8	34·7	3·16
Mg	0·30a	0·54a,b	0·50b	0·04	0·50	0·35	0·05
K	20·3a	22·2a,b	29·7b	1·91	29·7	28·2	2·23
Na	22·2a	21·6a	32·3b	1·65	32·3	29·7	2·32
Ox	1·08b	1·51a,b	1·68a	0·10	1·68	1·48	0·10
Sulfate	30·6a	43·5a,b	59·4b	5·18	59·4	39·0	5·50
Citrate	1·20b	0·64a	1·29b	0·13	1·29	0·89	0·16

HQ 35 %, high protein quality diet with 35 % crude protein content; HQ 44 %, high protein quality diet with 44 % crude protein content; HQ 57 %, high protein quality diet with 57 % crude protein content; LQ 55 %, low protein quality diet with 55 % crude protein content; BW, body weight.

a,b Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P ≤ 0·05).

* Mean value was significantly different from that for HQ 57 % (P ≤ 0·05).

† Protein quality differed depending on the amounts of greaves meal in the diets: HQ 35 % and HQ 44 %, 10 % greaves meal; HQ 57 %, 11 % greaves meal; LQ 55 %, 34 % greaves meal.

Urinary concentration and n class="Disease">renal excretion of anions and cations of n class="Species">cats fed a diet with a varying protein concentration and quality (Mean values with their standard errors; n 8 per diet)

HQ 35 %, high protein quality diet with 35 % crude protein content; HQ 44 %, high protein quality diet with 44 % crude protein content; HQ 57 %, high protein quality diet with 57 % crude protein content; n class="Chemical">LQ 55 %, low proteinpan> quality diet with 55 % crude proteinpan> content; BW, body weight.

a,b Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly difn class="Chemical">ferent (P ≤ 0·05).

* Mean value was significantly difn class="Chemical">ferent from that for HQ 57 % (P ≤ 0·05).

† Protein quality difn class="Chemical">fered dependinpan>g on the amounts of greaves meal inpan> the diets: HQ 35 % and HQ 44 %, 10 % greaves meal; HQ 57 %, 11 % greaves meal; n class="Chemical">LQ 55 %, 34 % greaves meal.

Impact on urinary concentration and excretion of sodium, potassium, phosphorus, magnesium, citrate and sulfate

Urinary n class="Chemical">Na and K conpan>centrationpan>s were the lowest inpan> the group that received diet HQ 57 % when compared with the diets HQ 35 % and HQ 44 %; however, caln class="Chemical">culating the renal excretion of these minerals demonstrated contrary results (Table 4). While urinary P concentrations were unaffected by dietary protein concentrations, renal P excretion increased with increasing protein in the diets. Urinary Mg concentrations and renal Mg excretion varied among the groups, while no unidirectional effect of protein concentration in the diet could be observed. Urinary citrate concentrations were markedly higher after feeding diet HQ 35 % (148 mg/l) when compared with the other groups (65·0–80·8 mg/l); however, based on daily renal citrate excretion, the amounts were comparable between the groups HQ 35 % and HQ 57 %, but lower in group HQ 44 %. Urinary sulfate concentrations were not affected by the protein concentration in the diet, while renal sulfate excretion increased with increasing dietary protein concentrations.

Impact on amount and DM of the faeces, faecal mineral concentrations and excretion

The daily amount of faeces on a n class="Disease">DM basis was the lowest inpan> group HQ 44 % when compared with the other groups, and the n class="Disease">DM concentration of the faeces decreased with increasing dietary protein (Table 5).

Table 5.

Amount of faeces, DM of the faeces, mineral concentrations in the faeces and faecal mineral excretion of cats fed a diet with a varying protein concentration and quality (Mean values with their standard errors; n 8 per diet)

	Protein concentration				Protein quality†
	HQ 35 %	HQ 44 %	HQ 57 %	sem	HQ 57 %	LQ 55 %	sem
Amount of faeces (g/kg BW per d)	5·25a	4·46a	7·35b	0·53	7·35	5·74	0·64
DM of the faeces (%)	44·2a,b	42·4b	39·3a	0·83	39·3	49·0	2·23
Amount of faeces (g DM/kg BW per d)	2·33b	1·85a	2·83b	0·19	2·83	2·88	0·31
Faecal concentrations (mg/g DM)
Ca	72·1b	63·0a	77·2b	1·62	77·2	68·2*	2·06
P	48·8b	33·2a	50·9b	1·81	50·9	41·1*	1·44
Mg	6·10b	5·24a	7·12b	0·20	7·12	4·72*	0·35
K	2·16a	4·48b	2·36a	0·37	2·36	1·08*	0·28
Na	2·13b	1·98a	2·35b	0·13	2·35	2·21	0·15
Cl	1·50	1·64	1·78	0·21	1·78	1·35	0·27
Faecal excretion (mg/kg BW per d)
Ca	167b	117a	224c	16·9	224	166*	21·5
P	112b	62·2a	144b	10·8	144	115	12·5
Na	5·27a,b	3·70a	6·93b	0·68	6·93	6·65	1·07
Mg	14·3b	9·76a	20·1b	1·49	20·1	13·2*	1·77
K	5·91	8·91	7·27	1·14	7·27	2·94*	1·10
Cl	3·69	3·32	5·58	0·77	5·58	4·11	1·12

HQ 35 %, high protein quality diet with 35 % crude protein content; HQ 44 %, high protein quality diet with 44 % crude protein content; HQ 57 %, high protein quality diet with 57 % crude protein content; LQ 55 %, low protein quality diet with 55 % crude protein content; BW, body weight.

a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P ≤ 0·05).

* Mean value was significantly different from that for HQ 57 % (P ≤ 0·05).

† Protein quality differed depending on the amounts of greaves meal in the diets: HQ 35 % and HQ 44 %, 10 % greaves meal; HQ 57 %, 11 % greaves meal; LQ 55 %, 34 % greaves meal.

Amount of faeces, n class="Disease">DM of the faeces, minpan>eral concentrations inpan> the faeces and faecal minpan>eral excretion of n class="Species">cats fed a diet with a varying protein concentration and quality (Mean values with their standard errors; n 8 per diet)

HQ 35 %, high protein quality diet with 35 % crude protein content; HQ 44 %, high protein quality diet with 44 % crude protein content; HQ 57 %, high protein quality diet with 57 % crude protein content; n class="Chemical">LQ 55 %, low proteinpan> quality diet with 55 % crude proteinpan> content; BW, body weight.

a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly difn class="Chemical">ferent (P ≤ 0·05).

* Mean value was significantly difn class="Chemical">ferent from that for HQ 57 % (P ≤ 0·05).

† Protein quality difn class="Chemical">fered dependinpan>g on the amounts of greaves meal inpan> the diets: HQ 35 % and HQ 44 %, 10 % greaves meal; HQ 57 %, 11 % greaves meal; n class="Chemical">LQ 55 %, 34 % greaves meal.

The protein concentration of the diets affected minpan>eral conpan>centrationpan>s inpan> the faeces of the n class="Species">cats; however, no unidirectional effect could be detected (Table 5). The lowest faecal Ca, P, Mg and Na concentrations, but the highest faecal K concentrations, were observed in group HQ 44 % when compared with the other groups. Cl concentrations in the faeces of the cats did not differ among the groups. The described observations also applied for faecal Ca, P, Mg and Na excretion, while faecal K and Cl excretion was unaffected by dietary protein concentration (Table 5).

Impact on apparent digestibility and mineral retention

The apparent digestibility of CP was the lowest in group HQ 35 % when compared with the groups HQ 44 % and HQ 57 % (Table 6). As described for the mineral concentrations in the faeces of the n class="Species">cats, no unidirectionpan>al efn class="Chemical">fect of protein concentration in the diet could be observed for the apparent digestibility and the retention of the minerals. The highest apparent digestibility of Ca, P and Mg, but the lowest apparent digestibility of K, was observed in group HQ 44 % when compared with the other groups. The apparent digestibility of Na and Cl did not differ among the groups. The retention of Ca, P and Mg was the highest, and the retention of Na and K was the lowest, in group HQ 44 % when compared with the groups HQ 35 % and HQ 57 % (Table 6).

Table 6.

Apparent digestibility of crude protein (CP) and minerals, and mineral retention of cats fed a diet with a varying protein concentration and quality (Mean values with their standard errors; n 8 per diet)

	Protein concentration				Protein quality†
	HQ 35 %	HQ 44 %	HQ 57 %	sem	HQ 57 %	LQ 55 %	sem
Apparent digestibility (%)
CP	83·3a	88·7b	87·6b	0·80	87·6	82·9	1·60
Ca	0·09a	22·5b	–19·1a	5·46	–19·1	–16·2	5·46
P	27·1a	57·6b	27·2a	3·90	27·2	23·5	3·90
Na	95·0	95·7	94·3	0·42	94·3	93·6	0·42
Mg	4·73a	34·4b	7·60a	4·68	7·60	–11·1	4·68
K	93·6b	87·5a	94·1b	1·29	94·1	96·5	1·29
Cl	97·7	97·4	96·0	0·51	96·0	97·2	0·51
Retention (mg/d)
Ca	–4·92a	98·8b	–32·6a,b	43·3	–32·6	–81·0	69·1
P	43·8a	172b	28·1a	23·7	28·1	11·1	32·7
Na	267b	213a	313c	15·5	313	269	19·4
Mg	0·90a	14·2b	4·20a,b	2·90	4·20	–4·72	3·99
K	217b	131a	313c	18·7	313	247*	20·0

HQ 35 %, high protein quality diet with 35 % crude protein content; HQ 44 %, high protein quality diet with 44 % crude protein content; HQ 57 %, high protein quality diet with 57 % crude protein content; LQ 55 %, low protein quality diet with 55 % crude protein content.

a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P ≤ 0·05).

* Mean value was significantly different from that for HQ 57 % (P ≤ 0·05).

† Protein quality differed depending on the amounts of greaves meal in the diets: HQ 35 % and HQ 44 %, 10 % greaves meal; HQ 57 %, 11 % greaves meal; LQ 55 %, 34 % greaves meal.

Apparent digestibility of crude protein (CP) and minerals, and mineral retention of n class="Species">cats n class="Chemical">fed a diet with a varying protein concentration and quality (Mean values with their standard errors; n 8 per diet)

HQ 35 %, high protein quality diet with 35 % crude protein content; HQ 44 %, high protein quality diet with 44 % crude protein content; HQ 57 %, high protein quality diet with 57 % crude protein content; n class="Chemical">LQ 55 %, low proteinpan> quality diet with 55 % crude proteinpan> content.

a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly difn class="Chemical">ferent (P ≤ 0·05).

* Mean value was significantly difn class="Chemical">ferent from that for HQ 57 % (P ≤ 0·05).

† Protein quality difn class="Chemical">fered dependinpan>g on the amounts of greaves meal inpan> the diets: HQ 35 % and HQ 44 %, 10 % greaves meal; HQ 57 %, 11 % greaves meal; n class="Chemical">LQ 55 %, 34 % greaves meal.

Effect of dietary protein quality

Impact on urinary concentration and excretion of calcium and oxalate and urinary relative supersaturation with calcium oxalate

The protein quality of the diets did not influence the total concentrations of Ca and n class="Chemical">Ox inpan> the urinpan>e of the n class="Species">cats, renal Ox excretion or urinary RSS CaOx values (Tables 3 and 4). However, renal Ca excretion was higher when feeding the diet with the lower amounts of greaves meal (HQ 57 %).

The protein quality of the diets did not affect the conpan>centrationpan>s of P, n class="Chemical">Mg, Na and K in the urine of the cats or the renal excretion of these minerals (Table 4). Urinary sulfate concentrations were lower in group LQ 55 % when compared with group HQ 57 %; however, renal sulfate excretion did not differ between the groups. Urinary citrate concentrations and renal citrate excretion were not affected by a different protein quality of the diets.

Impact on amount and DM of faeces, faecal mineral concentrations and excretion

The protein quality of the diets did not affect the daily amount of faeces of the n class="Species">cats or the faecal DM concentration (Table 5). Faecal Ca, P, Mg and K concentrations were lower in group LQ 55 % when compared with group HQ 57 %, while this effect was also observed for faecal Ca, Mg and K excretion (Table 5). Faecal Na and Cl concentrations and excretion were not affected by the varying amount of greaves meal in the diets.

The apparent digestibility of CP was apprn class="Chemical">oximately 5 % lower inpan> group n class="Chemical">LQ 55 % when compared with group HQ 57 %; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P > 0·05) (Table 6). The protein quality of the diets did not affect the apparent digestibility or the retention of the minerals (Table 6). The only exception was K retention, which was higher in group HQ 57 % when compared with group LQ 55 %.

Discussion

The present study was conducted to investigate the hypothesis that a high-protein diet can be considered as a risk factor for the formation of CaOx uroliths inpan> n class="Species">cats. While this is the scientific consensus in human subjects, since an increase in renal Ca and Ox excretion has been associated with a high protein intake(,), previous studies have indicated that a high-protein diet could be beneficial for the prevention of CaOx uroliths in cats(,,,). However, these studies were based on an epidemiological risk evaluation() or have only focused on the effects of dietary protein on the urinary volume() and urinary Ox excretion(,), while other risk factors for the formation of CaOx uroliths were not considered.

Urinary n class="Chemical">Ox conpan>centrationpan>s inpan> the present study were the lowest when n class="Chemical">feeding the high-protein diet (HQ 57 %); however, no strict decrease with increasing dietary protein concentrations could be detected, since the group that received the medium-protein diet (HQ 44 %) showed the highest urinary Ox concentrations and the difference between the low (HQ 35 %)- and high-protein group was small. In contrast, a unidirectional increase in renal Ox excretion was observed with increasing dietary protein concentrations. It can be assumed that the lower urinary Ox concentrations did result from the increase in the urinary volume associated with the high-protein diet. In general, it could be supposed that a lower urinary Ox concentration is of higher relevance than the increase in renal Ox excretion with regard to CaOx urolith formation. However, in this context, the calculated RSS CaOx values should not go unmentioned. We observed an increase in urinary RSS CaOx with increasing dietary protein concentrations, indicating that a high-protein diet may be critical for the formation of CaOx uroliths in cats and that the increase in renal Ox excretion with increasing dietary protein concentrations should not be undervalued.

The increased renal n class="Chemical">Ox excretionpan> can possibly be explainpan>ed by an enhanced endogenous n class="Chemical">Ox synthesis. In general, the amounts of Ox in cat food are considered to be small() and the average Ox concentration in the present diets was determined at 7 mg/100 g DM. Food components that are rich in Ox include vegetables and grain, moderate Ox concentrations are found in cereals and nuts, and only low amounts in food of animal origin like meat, milk products and fish(,). In a previous study(), renal Ox excretion was not affected by a high-protein diet based on casein. However, the authors concluded that this effect may be different in the case of another protein source. In the present study, the main protein source was poultry meal. Since poultry meal is often used for commercial cat food, the present results are of high practical relevance.

Interestingly, protein quality did not afn class="Chemical">fect urinpan>ary n class="Chemical">Ox concentrations or renal Ox excretion. It was hypothesised that a higher amount of hydroxyproline and glycine, derived from collagen-rich greaves meal in the diets, would enhance endogenous Ox synthesis. Another study demonstrated that a diet with collagen tissue as the protein source led to higher urinary Ox excretion when compared with diets based on horse meat or soya protein isolate(). However, the authors also demonstrated that the diet with lower amounts of collagen tissue resulted in higher urinary Ox excretion than a diet with high amounts of collagen tissue. This observation might indicate that other dietary factors than specific amino acids derived from collagen tissue could be important for endogenous Ox synthesis. In particular, one factor could be a higher fat concentration in the diet. In this previous study(), the fat concentration in the diet with low amounts of collagen tissue was 24 % on a DM basis, but in the diet with high amounts of collagen tissue 10 %, and it could be hypothesised that a higher dietary fat concentration enhanced endogenous Ox synthesis. Recent results() support this assumption, as higher urinary Ox concentrations were measured when feeding a high-fat diet compared with a high-protein diet. Up to now, the potential mechanisms that lead to an increased renal Ox excretion by a high fat intake remain unclear. It is hypothesised that high dietary fat concentrations could contribute to a complexation between fatty acids and Ca in the intestine. This would reduce the available amounts of Ca for binding Ox and increase the intestinal Ox absorption and renal Ox excretion(). Schmiedl et al.() suggest that hyperlipidaemia could increase hepatic Ox synthesis. The rats of this study showed hyperlipidaemia and elevated concentrations of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the blood when fed a high-fat diet. LDH can synthesise Ox from glycolate or other Ox precursors. Finally, the role of band 3 protein is discussed with regard to renal Ox excretion(). Band 3 protein is an anion transporter that catalyses the exchange of anions (for example, Ox) across a cell membrane. An activation (phosphorylation) of band 3 protein in erythrocytes in the intestine and kidneys can therefore increase intestinal Ox absorption and renal Ox excretion(). It has been demonstrated that arachidonic acid leads to a phosphorylation of band 3 protein in a dose-dependent manner().

It should be taken into consideration that the diets HQ 35 %, HQ 44 % and HQ 57 % showed some variations in fat concentrations (115, 124 and 171 g/kg n class="Disease">DM, respectively). Thus, it cannot be excluded that the observed inpan>crease inpan> renal n class="Chemical">Ox excretion associated with the high-protein diet could partly derive from the increase in dietary fat concentration. However, the diets HQ 57 % and LQ 55 % had comparable fat concentrations, independently of the amount of greaves meal. This aspect may be one reason for the observed similar urinary Ox concentrations and renal Ox excretion in these two groups. The present results highlight that a higher dietary amount of certain amino acids as potential precursors of endogenous Ox does not enhance endogenous Ox synthesis and may therefore be singularly no specific risk factor for the formation of CaOx uroliths in cats. In this context, it should not go unmentioned that the diets HQ 57 % and LQ 55 % varied in Mg concentrations (1·36 and 0·89 g/kg DM). High amounts of Mg can form a complex with Ox in the intestine, resulting in reduced intestinal absorption and renal excretion of Ox(). However, since no differences in urinary Ox concentrations or renal Ox excretion were observed between the two treatment groups, this effect seems to be negligible for the present study.

Urinary Ca concentrations and n class="Disease">renal Ca excretion inpan>creased with inpan>creasinpan>g proteinpan> conpan>centrationpan>s inpan> the present experin class="Species">mental diets. This observation is consistent with findings in human subjects(). However, the main explanation for the increase in renal Ca excretion by a high protein intake is an acid load derived from the oxidation of sulfur-containing amino acids to sulfuric acid and the associated release of protons(). In the present study, urinary pH did not decrease with increasing concentrations of dietary protein, indicating that the enhanced renal Ca excretion was not mediated by an acid load. Nevertheless, although urinary sulfate concentrations were also unaffected by increasing dietary protein concentrations, daily renal sulfate excretion doubled from 30·6 mg/kg BW to 59·4 mg/kg BW, indicating an enhanced oxidation of sulfur-containing amino acids when feeding the high-protein diet. Another theory implies that a high-protein diet could enhance intestinal Ca absorption and consecutively also renal Ca excretion(,). The present results did not demonstrate an increased apparent digestibility of Ca, but a higher faecal Ca excretion when feeding the high-protein diet. Since renal Ca excretion also increased, a marked negative Ca balance was observed. It can therefore be hypothesised that the increase in urinary Ca concentrations and renal Ca excretion with increasing dietary protein concentrations did not derive from a higher intestinal Ca absorption, but potentially from a Ca mobilisation within the organism. A negative Ca balance associated with a high protein intake has also been observed in young men(), and a negative correlation between protein intake and bone mineral content as well as between protein intake and bone density has been identified in young women(). Future studies should therefore evaluate whether the demonstrated negative Ca balance associated with a high-protein diet also affects bone mass in cats.

With regard to the increase in urinary Ca concentrations and n class="Disease">renal Ca excretion with inpan>creasinpan>g dietary proteinpan> conpan>centrationpan>s, it should be finpan>ally n class="Species">mentioned that the crude fibre concentrations of the diets HQ 35 %, HQ 44 % and HQ 57 % were relatively low, but showed some variation (11·1, 22·8 and 10·8 g/kg DM, respectively). In our experience, the analysed crude fibre concentrations in cat food can vary considerably, which requires a careful interpretation of the results. Extremely high dietary fibre concentrations (11–14 % in DM) have been reported to be associated with an increase in faecal DM excretion in cats, and faecal Ca excretion is positively correlated with faecal DM excretion(). These observations may indicate a reduction in intestinal Ca absorption by high dietary fibre concentrations, which has also been observed in rats when feeding diets with 2·62–3·25 % crude fibre on a DM basis compared with a control diet with 0·77 % crude fibre in DM(). As the present study demonstrated an increase in urinary Ca concentrations and renal Ca excretion, and no decrease was observed when feeding diet HQ 44 %, an effect on intestinal Ca absorption by varying crude fibre concentrations in the diets can be excluded.

Interestingly, n class="Disease">renal Ca excretion was lower when feeding the diet with the higher amount of greaves meal (LQ 55 %). Up to now, the reason for this effect has remained unclear. Compared with diet LQ 55 %, diet HQ 57 % contained less greaves meal and a mixture of poultry meal and soya protein. This mixture has ensured similar mineral and, with the exception of CP in the HQ groups, similar macronutrient concentrations compared with the other experimental diets. The apparent digestibility of CP tended to be higher in group HQ 57 % compared with group LQ 55 %, which might have influenced the amino acid, mineral and acid base metabolism of the cats. It could be demonstrated that the urinary sulfate concentrations (P ≤ 0·05), and the daily renal sulfate excretion (P > 0·05) were higher when feeding diet HQ 57 % compared with diet LQ 55 %. However, since urinary pH was unaffected by protein quality in the diets, an acid load that enhanced renal Ca excretion when feeding diet HQ 57 % could not be clearly detected. Thus, the potential impact of dietary protein quality on renal Ca excretion in cats cannot be conclusively clarified by the present study and needs further evaluation.

Urinary volume increased with higher protein concentrations in the diets. This finding is in accordance with previous studies in adult n class="Species">cats and kittens(–). A higher dilutionpan> of the urinpan>e can generally be advantageous for the preventionpan> of urinpan>ary crystals and stonpan>es(). However, sinpan>ce the higher dietary proteinpan> conpan>centrationpan>s were also associated with an inpan>creased renal Ca and n class="Chemical">Ox excretion, the higher urinary volume seems to be of minor importance. Dietary protein quality did not affect the urinary volume of the cats. Urinary pH was relatively low among all experimental groups, reaching values between 6·34 and 6·66. Since a urinary pH < 6·29 is considered to be a risk factor for the development of CaOx uroliths in cats(,), the measured values were near to this critical range.

For the interpretation of the present results, limitations of the study design should finally not go unn class="Species">mentionpan>ed. In the present study, a four-period, four-treatn class="Species">ment parallel cross-over design was used, which cannot eliminate carryover effects. However, the adaptation period was relatively long, and the cats were housed in a room with a constant light and temperature regimen; therefore constant conditions can reasonably be assumed for the present study.

In conclusion, the present data indicate that a high-protein diet cannot be considered as beneficial for the prevention of CaOx uroliths inpan> n class="Species">cats, as previously assumed. Although a higher urinary volume was also associated with a higher protein intake, the increased urinary Ca concentrations, renal Ca and Ox excretion and urinary RSS CaOx values are critical and potential risk factors for the formation of CaOx uroliths. In addition, the clinical relevance of the demonstrated negative Ca balance when feeding a high-protein diet should be further evaluated with regard to bone turnover. The impact of dietary protein quality on urine composition was generally low, with no effect on urinary Ca and Ox concentrations, RSS CaOx or renal Ox excretion. However, the observed lower renal Ca excretion in cats that received a diet with a higher amount of collagen-rich greaves meal needs further investigation.