Literature DB >> 24630326

Perception problems of the verbal scale.

Carrie Mullen1, Danielle Spence2, Linda Moxey2, Allan Jamieson3.   

Abstract

Many forensic scientists use a verbal scale to describe the significance or weight to be attached to their opinion. Although there is a considerable amount of work in the field of psychology regarding people's perception of quantitative descriptors such as those used in the verbal scale, there has been no published work relating to the use of such descriptors in a forensic context. Our aim was to assess the extent to which the verbal expressions used by the expert in court are perceived and the extent to which they are differentiated by potential jurors. Four hundred volunteers were asked to indicate the level of strength they perceived from the use of the verbal scale characters within excerpts from purported expert witness statements. Although preliminary, these results show that there are serious misunderstandings of the verbal scale. It does not achieve the purpose for which it was created. The terms used are unlikely to be understood properly by lay people and it would appear that they are actually misunderstood.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Perception; Verbal scale; Weight of evidence

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24630326     DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2013.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Justice        ISSN: 1355-0306            Impact factor:   2.124


  4 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive neuroscience in forensic science: understanding and utilizing the human element.

Authors:  Itiel E Dror
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Bayes and the Law.

Authors:  Norman Fenton; Martin Neil; Daniel Berger
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 3.  Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis.

Authors:  Heidi Eldridge
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Must the random man be unrelated? A lingering misconception in forensic genetics.

Authors:  Emmanuel Milot; Simon Baechler; Frank Crispino
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.395

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.