Literature DB >> 28495701

Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth.

John P McGann1.   

Abstract

It is commonly believed that humans have a poor sense of smell compared to other mammalian species. However, this idea derives not from empirical studies of human olfaction but from a famous 19th-century anatomist's hypothesis that the evolution of human free will required a reduction in the proportional size of the brain's olfactory bulb. The human olfactory bulb is actually quite large in absolute terms and contains a similar number of neurons to that of other mammals. Moreover, humans have excellent olfactory abilities. We can detect and discriminate an extraordinary range of odors, we are more sensitive than rodents and dogs for some odors, we are capable of tracking odor trails, and our behavioral and affective states are influenced by our sense of smell.
Copyright © 2017, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28495701      PMCID: PMC5512720          DOI: 10.1126/science.aam7263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  76 in total

Review 1.  The value of identity: olfactory notes on orbitofrontal cortex function.

Authors:  Jay A Gottfried; Christina Zelano
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Learning to smell the roses: experience-dependent neural plasticity in human piriform and orbitofrontal cortices.

Authors:  Wen Li; Erin Luxenberg; Todd Parrish; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Parallel processing of social signals by the mammalian main and accessory olfactory systems.

Authors:  M Spehr; J Spehr; K Ukhanov; K R Kelliher; T Leinders-Zufall; F Zufall
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  Always follow your nose: the functional significance of social chemosignals in human reproduction and survival.

Authors:  Katrin T Lübke; Bettina M Pause
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  Olfactory bulb recovery after early sensory deprivation.

Authors:  D M Cummings; H E Henning; P C Brunjes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Comparative study of aging in the mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Jennifer M Mirich; Nathaniel C Williams; Daniel J Berlau; Peter C Brunjes
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2002-12-23       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Olfactory sensitivity and odor structure-activity relationships for aliphatic carboxylic acids in CD-1 mice.

Authors:  Selçuk Can Güven; Matthias Laska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Greater addition of neurons to the olfactory bulb than to the cerebral cortex of eulipotyphlans but not rodents, afrotherians or primates.

Authors:  Pedro F M Ribeiro; Paul R Manger; Kenneth C Catania; Jon H Kaas; Suzana Herculano-Houzel
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.856

9.  Sexual dimorphism in the human olfactory bulb: females have more neurons and glial cells than males.

Authors:  Ana V Oliveira-Pinto; Raquel M Santos; Renan A Coutinho; Lays M Oliveira; Gláucia B Santos; Ana T L Alho; Renata E P Leite; José M Farfel; Claudia K Suemoto; Lea T Grinberg; Carlos A Pasqualucci; Wilson Jacob-Filho; Roberto Lent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Smelly primes - when olfactory primes do or do not work.

Authors:  M A M Smeets; G B Dijksterhuis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-12
View more
  88 in total

1.  Differential coding of perception in the world's languages.

Authors:  Asifa Majid; Seán G Roberts; Ludy Cilissen; Karen Emmorey; Brenda Nicodemus; Lucinda O'Grady; Bencie Woll; Barbara LeLan; Hilário de Sousa; Brian L Cansler; Shakila Shayan; Connie de Vos; Gunter Senft; N J Enfield; Rogayah A Razak; Sebastian Fedden; Sylvia Tufvesson; Mark Dingemanse; Ozge Ozturk; Penelope Brown; Clair Hill; Olivier Le Guen; Vincent Hirtzel; Rik van Gijn; Mark A Sicoli; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Linking smell to metabolism and aging.

Authors:  Jennifer L Garrison; Zachary A Knight
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Assessment of direct knowledge of the human olfactory system.

Authors:  Gregory Lane; Guangyu Zhou; Torben Noto; Christina Zelano
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 4.  Inhibitory circuits of the mammalian main olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Shawn D Burton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Optimal compressed sensing strategies for an array of nonlinear olfactory receptor neurons with and without spontaneous activity.

Authors:  Shanshan Qin; Qianyi Li; Chao Tang; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Human olfactory communication: current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Jan Havlíček; Benoist Schaal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Pleasant olfactory cues can reduce cigarette craving.

Authors:  Michael A Sayette; Mary A Marchetti; Rachel S Herz; Lea M Martin; Molly A Bowdring
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2019-04-15

8.  Olfaction written in bone: cribriform plate size parallels olfactory receptor gene repertoires in Mammalia.

Authors:  Deborah J Bird; William J Murphy; Lester Fox-Rosales; Iman Hamid; Robert A Eagle; Blaire Van Valkenburgh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Group and kin recognition via olfactory cues in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Stefanie Henkel; Joanna M Setchell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Reproducible research into human chemical communication by cues and pheromones: learning from psychology's renaissance.

Authors:  Tristram D Wyatt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.