Claudia Kuhli-Hattenbach1, Michael Janusz Koss2, Thomas Kohnen2, Maria Fronius2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. hattenbach@med.uni-frankfurt.de. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To search for morphological abnormalities in compliant unilaterally amblyopic children with poor occlusion treatment outcomes, for the first time with electronically recorded patching dosage. We included school children with remaining interocular logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) difference ≥ 0.3 after patching time of more than 22 months and 1300 h total in a previous prospective study. METHODS: Six patients with a mean age of 11.19 years were included. Four patients had anisometropic amblyopia and two patients had a mixed strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Best-corrected visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, dilated fundus examination, optic disc morphology and macular thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT), retinal visual acuity, color perception, and the presence of a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) were assessed. Paired t tests were performed to compare optic disc values and macular thickness of the amblyopic eyes to those of the fellow eyes. RESULTS: Average (± SD) logMAR VA in the amblyopic eyes was 0.42 (±0.23) with a remaining average interocular difference (IOD) of 0.51 (± 0.23), despite electronically monitored occlusion treatment of more than 1300 h. All patients presented with hyperopia and a significantly different mean spherical equivalent of + 4.73 (± 2.73) D in the amblyopic eye compared with the fellow eye (p = 0.02). A statistically significant difference in macular thickness was found between amblyopic and fellow eyes, with amblyopic eyes having an increased average thickness (p = 0.0062) and total volume (p = 0.0091) of the macula. One patient had familial hereditary primary macrodisc in both eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide evidence that average macular thickness and total macular volume tended to be increased among these compliant amblyopic children with unsatisfactory occlusion treatment outcomes. Further studies are warranted to evaluate whether morphological changes may have an impact on the effectiveness of amblyopia treatment. Moreover, our findings suggest that greater magnitude of hyperopia and anisometropia as well as older age may be risk factors associated with a poor visual acuity outcome among compliant amblyopic children.
PURPOSE: To search for morphological abnormalities in compliant unilaterally amblyopic children with poor occlusion treatment outcomes, for the first time with electronically recorded patching dosage. We included school children with remaining interocular logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) difference ≥ 0.3 after patching time of more than 22 months and 1300 h total in a previous prospective study. METHODS: Six patients with a mean age of 11.19 years were included. Four patients had anisometropic amblyopia and two patients had a mixed strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Best-corrected visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, dilated fundus examination, optic disc morphology and macular thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT), retinal visual acuity, color perception, and the presence of a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) were assessed. Paired t tests were performed to compare optic disc values and macular thickness of the amblyopic eyes to those of the fellow eyes. RESULTS: Average (± SD) logMAR VA in the amblyopic eyes was 0.42 (±0.23) with a remaining average interocular difference (IOD) of 0.51 (± 0.23), despite electronically monitored occlusion treatment of more than 1300 h. All patients presented with hyperopia and a significantly different mean spherical equivalent of + 4.73 (± 2.73) D in the amblyopic eye compared with the fellow eye (p = 0.02). A statistically significant difference in macular thickness was found between amblyopic and fellow eyes, with amblyopic eyes having an increased average thickness (p = 0.0062) and total volume (p = 0.0091) of the macula. One patient had familial hereditary primary macrodisc in both eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide evidence that average macular thickness and total macular volume tended to be increased among these compliant amblyopic children with unsatisfactory occlusion treatment outcomes. Further studies are warranted to evaluate whether morphological changes may have an impact on the effectiveness of amblyopia treatment. Moreover, our findings suggest that greater magnitude of hyperopia and anisometropia as well as older age may be risk factors associated with a poor visual acuity outcome among compliant amblyopic children.
Authors: J Kracht; I Bachert; C M Diehl; S Kämmerling; M Lüchtenberg; A Zubcov; H Simonsz; M Fronius Journal: Klin Monbl Augenheilkd Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 0.700
Authors: Jonathan M Holmes; Raymond T Kraker; Roy W Beck; Eileen E Birch; Susan A Cotter; Donald F Everett; Richard W Hertle; Graham E Quinn; Michael X Repka; Mitchell M Scheiman; David K Wallace Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Catherine E Stewart; David A Stephens; Alistair R Fielder; Merrick J Moseley Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 4.799