Literature DB >> 17525188

Modeling dose-response in amblyopia: toward a child-specific treatment plan.

Catherine E Stewart1, David A Stephens, Alistair R Fielder, Merrick J Moseley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article describes an empirically derived mathematical model of the treatment dose-response of occlusion therapy for amblyopia based on outcome data obtained from the Monitored Occlusion Treatment for Amblyopia Study (MOTAS).
METHODS: The MOTAS protocol comprised three discrete phases: baseline, refractive adaptation, and occlusion. Only data from the occlusion phase were used in this dose-response model. Seventy-two participants, 3 to 8 years of age, mean +/- SD age 5.2 +/- 1.4 years (anisometropia [n = 18]); strabismus [n = 22]); both anisometropia and strabismus [n = 32]) completed the occlusion phase. All participants were prescribed 6-h/d patching, which was objectively monitored by an occlusion dose monitor (ODM).
RESULTS: Simple normal linear regression modeling of the data on an interval-by-interval basis (interval between clinic visits) indicates that increasing cumulative dose within interval (hours) yields an increase in visual acuity (R2 = 0.918; 684 data points). Most of the children achieved their best visual acuity with 150 to 250 hours' cumulative dose. Specific patient characteristics (especially age) modify the steepness of this function. For example, a 0.20-logMAR (2-line logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) gain in visual acuity requires a cumulative dose of 170 hours for children at age 48 months and 236 hours at age 72 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Mathematical modeling of amblyopia therapy is a novel approach that elucidates the kinetics of the therapeutic response in humans. This response is age-influenced so that older children require a greater dose to achieve the same outcome--evidence of altered plasticity of the visual system. Fine-tuning the dose-response in amblyopia therapy will facilitate the development of child-specific, evidence-based treatment plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17525188     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  29 in total

1.  Improvement of visual acuity in children with anisometropic amblyopia treated with rotated prisms combined with near activity.

Authors:  Chao-Chyun Lin; Po-Liang Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Binocular iPad treatment for amblyopia in preschool children.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch; Simone L Li; Reed M Jost; Sarah E Morale; Angie De La Cruz; David Stager; Lori Dao; David R Stager
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.220

Review 3.  Improving the performance of the amblyopic visual system.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Roger W Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  The treatment of amblyopia: current practice and emerging trends.

Authors:  Eleni Papageorgiou; Ioannis Asproudis; Gail Maconachie; Evangelia E Tsironi; Irene Gottlob
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Dichoptic movie viewing treats childhood amblyopia.

Authors:  Simone L Li; Alexandre Reynaud; Robert F Hess; Yi-Zhong Wang; Reed M Jost; Sarah E Morale; Angie De La Cruz; Lori Dao; David Stager; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  A pilot randomized clinical trial of intermittent occlusion therapy liquid crystal glasses versus traditional patching for treatment of moderate unilateral amblyopia.

Authors:  Jingyun Wang; Daniel E Neely; Jay Galli; Joshua Schliesser; April Graves; Tina G Damarjian; Jessica Kovarik; James Bowsher; Heather A Smith; Dana Donaldson; Kathryn M Haider; Gavin J Roberts; Derek T Sprunger; David A Plager
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 1.220

Review 7.  [Treatment monitoring and innovations in amblyopia treatment].

Authors:  Kai Januschowski; Caroline Emmerich; Annegret Abaza; Henrike Julich-Haertel; Annekatrin Rickmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  A dichoptic custom-made action video game as a treatment for adult amblyopia.

Authors:  Indu Vedamurthy; Mor Nahum; Samuel J Huang; Frank Zheng; Jessica Bayliss; Daphne Bavelier; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Rethinking amblyopia 2020.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  Amblyopia and binocular vision.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 21.198

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.