Literature DB >> 26100447

Editor's choice - thirty day outcomes and costs of fenestrated and branched stent grafts versus open repair for complex aortic aneurysms.

M Michel1, J-P Becquemin2, M-C Clément3, J Marzelle2, C Quelen3, I Durand-Zaleski4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare 30 day outcomes and costs of fenestrated and branched stent grafts (f/b EVAR) and open surgery (OSR) for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA).
METHODS: The multicenter prospective registry WINDOW was set up to evaluate f/b EVAR in high risk patients with para/juxtarenal AAA, and infradiaphragmatic and supradiaphragmatic TAAA. A control group of patients treated by OSR was extracted from the national hospital discharge database. The primary endpoint was 30 day mortality. Secondary endpoints included severe complications, length of stay, and costs. Mortality was assessed by survival analysis and uni/multivariate Cox regression analyses using pre- and post-operative characteristics. Bootstrap methods were used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of f/b EVAR versus OSR.
RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty eight cases and 1,678 controls were included. There was no difference in 30 day mortality (6.7% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.40), but costs were higher with f/b EVAR (€38,212 vs. €16,497, p < .001). After group stratification, mortality was similar with both treatments for para/juxtarenal AAA (4.3% vs. 5.8%, p = .26) and supradiaphragmatic TAAA (11.9% vs. 19.7%, p = .70), and higher with f/b EVAR for infradiaphragmatic TAAA (11.9% vs. 4.0%, p = .010). Costs were higher with f/b EVAR for para/juxtarenal AAA (€34,425 vs. €14,907, p < .0001) and infradiaphragmatic TAAA (€37,927 vs. €17,530, p < .0001), but not different for supradiaphragmatic TAAA (€54,710 vs. €44,163, p = .18).
CONCLUSION: f/b EVAR does not appear justified for patients with para/juxtarenal AAA and infradiaphragmatic TAAA fit for OSR but may be an attractive option for patients with para/juxtarenal AAA not eligible for surgery and patients with supradiaphragmatic TAAA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01168037; identifier: NCT01168037 (WINDOW registry).
Copyright © 2015 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Endovascular procedures; Open surgery; Thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26100447     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  13 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Versus Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Evidence to Guide the Optimal Approach for the Individual Patient.

Authors:  Theodore Hart; Ross Milner
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Patient selection and perioperative outcomes are similar between targeted and nontargeted hospitals (in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Peter A Soden; Sara L Zettervall; Klaas H J Ultee; Jeremy D Darling; John C McCallum; Allen D Hamdan; Mark C Wyers; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Endovascular Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: the Year in Review.

Authors:  John E O'Mara; Robert M Bersin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-08

Review 4.  Fenestrated and Branched Aortic Grafts.

Authors:  Bartosz Rylski; Martin Czerny; Michael Südkamp; Maximilian Russe; Matthiase Siep; Friedhelm Beyersdorf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  Endovascular Treatment of Various Aortic Pathologies: Review of the Latest Data and Technologies.

Authors:  Koji Maeda; Takao Ohki; Yuji Kanaoka
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-05-07

6.  Episode-based cost reduction for endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Nathan K Itoga; Ning Tang; Diana Patterson; Rika Ohkuma; Raymond Lew; Matthew W Mell; Ronald L Dalman
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Gimme' the Loop: Modifications to the Squid-Capture Technique for Laser-Fenestrated Thoracic Endografting.

Authors:  Joscha Mulorz; Artis Knapsis; Neslihan Ertas; Hubert Schelzig; Markus Udo Wagenhäuser
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Meta-analysis of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms over the last 10 years.

Authors:  A D Jones; M A Waduud; P Walker; D Stocken; M A Bailey; D J A Scott
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-05-17

9.  In Situ Laser Fenestration Is a Feasible Method for Revascularization of Aortic Arch During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Authors:  Jinbao Qin; Zhen Zhao; Ruihua Wang; Kaichuang Ye; Weimin Li; Xiaobing Liu; Guang Liu; Chaoyi Cui; Huihua Shi; Zhiyou Peng; Fukang Yuan; Xinrui Yang; Min Lu; Xintian Huang; Mier Jiang; Xin Wang; Minyi Yin; Xinwu Lu
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Association of Pediatric Inpatient Socioeconomic Status With Hospital Efficiency and Financial Balance.

Authors:  Morgane Michel; Corinne Alberti; Jean-Claude Carel; Karine Chevreul
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.