Literature DB >> 26100116

Using Data Independent Acquisition (DIA) to Model High-responding Peptides for Targeted Proteomics Experiments.

Brian C Searle1, Jarrett D Egertson2, James G Bollinger2, Andrew B Stergachis2, Michael J MacCoss3.   

Abstract

Targeted mass spectrometry is an essential tool for detecting quantitative changes in low abundant proteins throughout the proteome. Although selected reaction monitoring (SRM) is the preferred method for quantifying peptides in complex samples, the process of designing SRM assays is laborious. Peptides have widely varying signal responses dictated by sequence-specific physiochemical properties; one major challenge is in selecting representative peptides to target as a proxy for protein abundance. Here we present PREGO, a software tool that predicts high-responding peptides for SRM experiments. PREGO predicts peptide responses with an artificial neural network trained using 11 minimally redundant, maximally relevant properties. Crucial to its success, PREGO is trained using fragment ion intensities of equimolar synthetic peptides extracted from data independent acquisition experiments. Because of similarities in instrumentation and the nature of data collection, relative peptide responses from data independent acquisition experiments are a suitable substitute for SRM experiments because they both make quantitative measurements from integrated fragment ion chromatograms. Using an SRM experiment containing 12,973 peptides from 724 synthetic proteins, PREGO exhibits a 40-85% improvement over previously published approaches at selecting high-responding peptides. These results also represent a dramatic improvement over the rules-based peptide selection approaches commonly used in the literature.
© 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26100116      PMCID: PMC4563719          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M115.051300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  31 in total

1.  AAindex: amino acid index database.

Authors:  S Kawashima; M Kanehisa
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Protein surface amino acid compositions distinctively differ between thermophilic and mesophilic bacteria.

Authors:  S Fukuchi; K Nishikawa
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  An analysis of protein domain linkers: their classification and role in protein folding.

Authors:  Richard A George; Jaap Heringa
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2002-11

4.  Prediction of low-energy collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides.

Authors:  Zhongqi Zhang
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 5.  Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions.

Authors:  Paola Picotti; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Status of empirical methods for the prediction of protein backbone topography.

Authors:  F R Maxfield; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1976-11-16       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Abundance-based classifier for the prediction of mass spectrometric peptide detectability upon enrichment (PPA).

Authors:  Jan Muntel; Sarah A Boswell; Shaojun Tang; Saima Ahmed; Ilan Wapinski; Greg Foley; Hanno Steen; Michael Springer
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Targeted proteomics.

Authors:  Vivien Marx
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Multiplexed peptide analysis using data-independent acquisition and Skyline.

Authors:  Jarrett D Egertson; Brendan MacLean; Richard Johnson; Yue Xuan; Michael J MacCoss
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 10.  Targeted quantitation of proteins by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Daniel C Liebler; Lisa J Zimmerman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  15 in total

1.  A Skyline Plugin for Pathway-Centric Data Browsing.

Authors:  Michael G Degan; Lillian Ryadinskiy; Grant M Fujimoto; Christopher S Wilkins; Cheryl F Lichti; Samuel H Payne
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Skyline Performs as Well as Vendor Software in the Quantitative Analysis of Serum 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D and Vitamin D Binding Globulin.

Authors:  Clark M Henderson; Nicholas J Shulman; Brendan MacLean; Michael J MacCoss; Andrew N Hoofnagle
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 3.  The Skyline ecosystem: Informatics for quantitative mass spectrometry proteomics.

Authors:  Lindsay K Pino; Brian C Searle; James G Bollinger; Brook Nunn; Brendan MacLean; Michael J MacCoss
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2017-07-09       Impact factor: 10.946

4.  Quantitative Proteomics Based on Optimized Data-Independent Acquisition in Plasma Analysis.

Authors:  Eslam N Nigjeh; Ru Chen; Randall E Brand; Gloria M Petersen; Suresh T Chari; Priska D von Haller; Jimmy K Eng; Ziding Feng; Qingxiang Yan; Teresa A Brentnall; Sheng Pan
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Mass Spectrometry Profiling of HLA-Associated Peptidomes in Mono-allelic Cells Enables More Accurate Epitope Prediction.

Authors:  Jennifer G Abelin; Derin B Keskin; Siranush Sarkizova; Christina R Hartigan; Wandi Zhang; John Sidney; Jonathan Stevens; William Lane; Guang Lan Zhang; Thomas M Eisenhaure; Karl R Clauser; Nir Hacohen; Michael S Rooney; Steven A Carr; Catherine J Wu
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 31.745

6.  Reducing Peptide Sequence Bias in Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Data with Machine Learning.

Authors:  Ayse B Dincer; Yang Lu; Devin K Schweppe; Sewoong Oh; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.370

Review 7.  Application of targeted mass spectrometry in bottom-up proteomics for systems biology research.

Authors:  Nathan P Manes; Aleksandra Nita-Lazar
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  CIDer: A Statistical Framework for Interpreting Differences in CID and HCD Fragmentation.

Authors:  Damien B Wilburn; Alicia L Richards; Danielle L Swaney; Brian C Searle
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  CIRFESS: An Interactive Resource for Querying the Set of Theoretically Detectable Peptides for Cell Surface and Extracellular Enrichment Proteomic Studies.

Authors:  Matthew Waas; Jack Littrell; Rebekah L Gundry
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.262

Review 10.  Parallel Reaction Monitoring: A Targeted Experiment Performed Using High Resolution and High Mass Accuracy Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Navin Rauniyar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.