Xiuhong Pang1, Yongchuan Chai2, Penghui Chen2, Longxia He2, Xiaowen Wang2, Hao Wu3, Tao Yang4. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases, Shanghai, China; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taizhou People's Hospital, Jiangsu Province, China. 2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases, Shanghai, China. 3. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: wuhao622@sina.cn. 4. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: yangtfxl@sina.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Recessive mutations of SLC26A4 are the major cause of hearing impairment associated with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA). In a significant percentage of non-syndromic EVA patients, however, only mono-allelic mutations of SLC26A4 can be identified. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether presence of mono-allelic mutations of SLC26A4 in those patients was coincidental or etiologically associated with the disorder. METHODS: The exons and flanking splicing sites of SLC26A4 were sequenced in 150 Chinese Han deaf probands with non-syndromic EVA. c.919-2A >G and p.H723R, two frequent mutations of SLC26A4 in Chinese Hans, were screened by an allele-specific PCR-based array in 3056 ethnically-matched normal hearing controls. The frequency of mono-allelic c.919-2A >G and p.H723R mutations was determined in each group. The statistical significance of the difference was analyzed by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Bi-allelic, mono-allelic and no mutation of SLC26A4 were detected in 98 (65.3%), 18 (12%) and 34 (22.67%) deaf probands with non-syndromic EVA, respectively. The frequency of mono-allelic c.919-2A >G and p.H723R mutations were significantly higher in the 150 deaf probands with non-syndromic EVA (8.67%) than in the 3056 normal hearing controls (1.4%, P=1.8×10(-6)). CONCLUSION: Presence of mono-allelic mutations of SLC26A4 in non-syndromic EVA patients is etiologically associated with this disorder. Additional genetic or environmental causes may be present in those patients and demand further investigation and consideration during the genetic diagnosis and counseling.
OBJECTIVES: Recessive mutations of SLC26A4 are the major cause of hearing impairment associated with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA). In a significant percentage of non-syndromic EVApatients, however, only mono-allelic mutations of SLC26A4 can be identified. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether presence of mono-allelic mutations of SLC26A4 in those patients was coincidental or etiologically associated with the disorder. METHODS: The exons and flanking splicing sites of SLC26A4 were sequenced in 150 Chinese Han deaf probands with non-syndromic EVA. c.919-2A >G and p.H723R, two frequent mutations of SLC26A4 in Chinese Hans, were screened by an allele-specific PCR-based array in 3056 ethnically-matched normal hearing controls. The frequency of mono-allelic c.919-2A >G and p.H723R mutations was determined in each group. The statistical significance of the difference was analyzed by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Bi-allelic, mono-allelic and no mutation of SLC26A4 were detected in 98 (65.3%), 18 (12%) and 34 (22.67%) deaf probands with non-syndromic EVA, respectively. The frequency of mono-allelic c.919-2A >G and p.H723R mutations were significantly higher in the 150 deaf probands with non-syndromic EVA (8.67%) than in the 3056 normal hearing controls (1.4%, P=1.8×10(-6)). CONCLUSION: Presence of mono-allelic mutations of SLC26A4 in non-syndromic EVApatients is etiologically associated with this disorder. Additional genetic or environmental causes may be present in those patients and demand further investigation and consideration during the genetic diagnosis and counseling.
Authors: Valeriia Yu Danilchenko; Marina V Zytsar; Ekaterina A Maslova; Marita S Bady-Khoo; Nikolay A Barashkov; Igor V Morozov; Alexander A Bondar; Olga L Posukh Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-12-17