Literature DB >> 26099569

Shade Trading: An Emerging Riparian Forest-Based Payment for Ecosystem Services Market in Oregon, USA.

Kathleen Guillozet1.   

Abstract

This paper describes the regulatory and compliance context for Oregon's emerging ecosystem services (ES) market in riparian shade to meet water quality obligations. In Oregon's market as with many other ES programs, contracts and other regulatory documents not only delimit the obligations and liabilities of different parties, but also constitute a primary mechanism through which ES service delivery is measured. Through a review of compliance criteria I find that under Oregon's shade trades, permittees are held to a number of input-based criteria, which essentially affirm that parties comply with predetermined practices and procedures, and one 'pseudo output based' criterion, in which ES delivery is estimated through a model. The case presented in the paper critically engages with the challenges of measuring ES and in assessing the outcomes of ES projects. It places these challenges as interrelated and proposes that market designers, policymakers, and other stakeholders should consider explicit efficacy, efficiency, and equity targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26099569     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0563-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  8 in total

Review 1.  The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation.

Authors:  Sven Wunder
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.560

2.  Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration.

Authors:  Robert B Jackson; Esteban G Jobbágy; Roni Avissar; Somnath Baidya Roy; Damian J Barrett; Charles W Cook; Kathleen A Farley; David C le Maitre; Bruce A McCarl; Brian C Murray
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The contradictory logic of global ecosystem services markets.

Authors:  Kathleen McAfee
Journal:  Dev Change       Date:  2012

4.  Effects of urbanization and urban stream restoration on the physical and biological structure of stream ecosystems.

Authors:  Christy R Violin; Peter Cada; Elizabeth B Sudduth; Brooke A Hassett; David L Penrose; Emily S Bernhardt
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Increasing participation in incentive programs for biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Michael G Sorice; Chi-Ok Oh; Todd Gartner; Mary Snieckus; Rhett Johnson; C Josh Donlan
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Effectiveness of biodiversity surrogates for conservation planning: different measures of effectiveness generate a kaleidoscope of variation.

Authors:  Hedley S Grantham; Robert L Pressey; Jessie A Wells; Andrew J Beattie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments.

Authors:  Paul J Ferraro; Subhrendu K Pattanayak
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Measuring effectiveness, efficiency and equity in an experimental Payments for Ecosystem Services trial.

Authors:  Adrian Martin; Nicole Gross-Camp; Bereket Kebede; Shawn McGuire
Journal:  Glob Environ Change       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.523

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.