| Literature DB >> 26099528 |
Mei-Chiung Shih1, Mintu Turakhia2, Tze Leung Lai3.
Abstract
One of the provisions of the health care reform legislation in 2010 was for funding pragmatic clinical trials or large observational studies for comparing the effectiveness of different approved medical treatments, involving broadly representative patient populations. After reviewing pragmatic clinical trials and the issues and challenges that have made them just a small fraction of comparative effectiveness research (CER), we focus on a recent development that uses point-of-care (POC) clinical trials to address the issue of "knowledge-action gap" in pragmatic CER trials. We give illustrative examples of POC-CER trials and describe a trial that we are currently planning to compare the effectiveness of newly approved oral anticoagulants. We also develop novel stage-wise designs of information-rich POC-CER trials under competitive budget constraints, by using recent advances in adaptive designs and other statistical methodologies. Published by Elsevier Inc.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptive design; Anticoagulants; Comparative effectiveness; Point-of-care trials; Pragmatic trials; Shared decision making
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26099528 PMCID: PMC4639459 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.06.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contemp Clin Trials ISSN: 1551-7144 Impact factor: 2.226