Literature DB >> 20035977

Economic costs of overactive bladder in the United States.

Michael L Ganz1, Amy M Smalarz, Tracey L Krupski, Jennifer T Anger, Jim C Hu, Kim U Wittrup-Jensen, Chris L Pashos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To calculate, from a societal perspective, current direct (medical and nonmedical) and indirect costs of overactive bladder (OAB) in the United States and project them to future years. Existing cost assessments of OAB in the United States are incomplete and outdated.
METHODS: A prevalence-based model was developed incorporating age- and sex-specific OAB prevalence rates, usage data, and productivity data. On the basis of the information gathered from the recent 5 years of the medical literature, practice guidelines, Medicare and managed care fee schedules, and expert panel input, the annual per capita and total US costs were calculated for 2007. US census population forecasts were used to project the costs of OAB to 2015 and 2020.
RESULTS: In 2007, average annual per capita costs of OAB were $1925 ($1433 in direct medical, $66 in direct nonmedical, and $426 in indirect costs). Applying these costs to the 34 million people in the United States with OAB results in total national costs of $65.9 billion (billion = 1000 million), ($49.1 billion direct medical, $2.3 billion direct nonmedical, and $14.6 billion indirect). Average annual per capita costs in 2015 and 2020 would be $1944 and $1969 and total national costs would be $76.2 billion and $82.6 billion, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the economic burden of OAB is about 5-fold higher than older, noncomprehensive estimates. These costs are higher than previously published data for the United States and Europe because this analysis relies on more current data, real world age- and sex-specific treatment patterns and costs, and includes a more complete set of cost components. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20035977     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  71 in total

1.  Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and overactive bladder.

Authors:  Kamran P Sajadi; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Time-to-effect with darifenacin in overactive bladder: a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Vik Khullar; Jenelle Foote; Yodit Seifu; Mathias Egermark
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Association between Sarcopenia and Overactive Bladder in Elderly Diabetic Patients.

Authors:  S Ida; R Kaneko; H Nagata; Y Noguchi; Y Araki; M Nakai; S Ito; K Imataka; K Murata
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  Control of urinary bladder smooth muscle excitability by the TRPM4 channel modulator 9-phenanthrol.

Authors:  Shankar P Parajuli; Kiril L Hristov; Michelle N Sullivan; Wenkuan Xin; Amy C Smith; Scott Earley; John Malysz; Georgi V Petkov
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 5.  Management of Overactive Bladder in the Face of High Grade Prolapse.

Authors:  Juan Guzman-Negron; Sandip Vasavada
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Review of Economic Value Drivers of the Treatment of Overactive Bladder.

Authors:  Sonya J Snedecor
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Global perspective of treatment failures.

Authors:  Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  The effect of pelvic organ prolapse severity on improvement in overactive bladder symptoms after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Jeannine M Miranne; Vrishali Lopes; Cassandra L Carberry; Vivian W Sung
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Effectiveness of an intervention to optimise the use of mirabegron for overactive bladder: a quasi-experimental study in primary care.

Authors:  Eladio Fernández-Liz; Pere Vivó Tristante; Antonio Aranzana Martínez; Maria Estrella Barceló Colomer; Josep Ossó Rebull; Maria Josep López Dolcet
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 10.  Pelvic floor disorders following vaginal or cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Hafsa Memon; Victoria L Handa
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.