Literature DB >> 26098462

Artificial Neural Network Approach for Differentiating Open-Angle Glaucoma From Glaucoma Suspect Without a Visual Field Test.

Ein Oh, Tae Keun Yoo, Samin Hong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To increase the effectiveness of treating open-angle glaucoma (OAG), we tried to find a screening method of differentiating OAG from glaucoma suspect (GS) without a visual field (VF) test.
METHODS: Data were collected from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) conducted in 2010. Of 8958 participants, 386 suspected OAG subjects underwent a VF test. For the training dataset, five OAG risk prediction models were created using multivariate logistic regression and an artificial neural network (ANN) with various clinical variables. Informative variables were selected by an algorithm of consistency subset evaluation, and cross validation was used to optimize performance. The test dataset was used subsequently to assess OAG-prediction performance using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic.
RESULTS: Among five OAG risk prediction models, an ANN model with nine noncategorized factors had the greatest AUC (0.890). It predicted OAG with an accuracy of 84.0%, sensitivity of 78.3%, and specificity of 85.9%. It included four nonophthalmologic factors (sex, age, menopause, and duration of hypertension) and five ophthalmologic factors (IOP, spherical equivalent refractive errors, vertical cup-to-disc ratio, presence of superotemporal retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL] defect, and presence of inferotemporal RNFL defect).
CONCLUSIONS: Though VF tests are considered the most important examination to distinguish OAG from GS, they sometimes are impractical to conduct for small private eye clinics and during large scale medical check-ups. The ANN approach may be a cost-effective screening tool for differentiating OAG patients from GS subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26098462     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-16805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  11 in total

1.  Oculomics for sarcopenia prediction: a machine learning approach toward predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.

Authors:  Bo Ram Kim; Tae Keun Yoo; Hong Kyu Kim; Ik Hee Ryu; Jin Kuk Kim; In Sik Lee; Jung Soo Kim; Dong-Hyeok Shin; Young-Sang Kim; Bom Taeck Kim
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 8.836

2.  Systematic Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Research Hotspots and Trends on the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmic Disease Diagnosis.

Authors:  Junqiang Zhao; Yi Lu; Shaojun Zhu; Keran Li; Qin Jiang; Weihua Yang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.988

3.  Automated detection of mild and multi-class diabetic eye diseases using deep learning.

Authors:  Rubina Sarki; Khandakar Ahmed; Hua Wang; Yanchun Zhang
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2020-10-08

4.  Predictive Analytics for Glaucoma Using Data From the All of Us Research Program.

Authors:  Sally L Baxter; Bharanidharan Radha Saseendrakumar; Paulina Paul; Jihoon Kim; Luca Bonomi; Tsung-Ting Kuo; Roxana Loperena; Francis Ratsimbazafy; Eric Boerwinkle; Mine Cicek; Cheryl R Clark; Elizabeth Cohn; Kelly Gebo; Kelsey Mayo; Stephen Mockrin; Sheri D Schully; Andrea Ramirez; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 5.488

5.  Multi-categorical deep learning neural network to classify retinal images: A pilot study employing small database.

Authors:  Joon Yul Choi; Tae Keun Yoo; Jeong Gi Seo; Jiyong Kwak; Terry Taewoong Um; Tyler Hyungtaek Rim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Artificial Intelligence and Ophthalmology

Authors:  Kadircan Keskinbora; Fatih Güven
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-05

Review 7.  Current status and future trends of clinical diagnoses via image-based deep learning.

Authors:  Jie Xu; Kanmin Xue; Kang Zhang
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 8.  Portable hardware & software technologies for addressing ophthalmic health disparities: A systematic review.

Authors:  Margarita Labkovich; Megan Paul; Eliott Kim; Randal A Serafini; Shreyas Lakhtakia; Aly A Valliani; Andrew J Warburton; Aashay Patel; Davis Zhou; Bonnie Sklar; James Chelnis; Ebrahim Elahi
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-05-06

Review 9.  An Overview of Ophthalmologic Survey Methodology in the 2008-2015 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys.

Authors:  Kyung Chul Yoon; Won Choi; Hyo Seok Lee; Sang-Duck Kim; Seung-Hyun Kim; Chan Yun Kim; Ki Ho Park; Young Jeung Park; Seung-Hee Baek; Su Jeong Song; Jae Pil Shin; Suk-Woo Yang; Seung-Young Yu; Jong Soo Lee; Key Hwan Lim; Kyung Won Oh; Se Woong Kang
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-25

Review 10.  Artificial Intelligence Evidence-Based Current Status and Potential for Lower Limb Vascular Management.

Authors:  Xenia Butova; Sergey Shayakhmetov; Maxim Fedin; Igor Zolotukhin; Sergio Gianesini
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.