PURPOSE: To increase the effectiveness of treating open-angle glaucoma (OAG), we tried to find a screening method of differentiating OAG from glaucoma suspect (GS) without a visual field (VF) test. METHODS: Data were collected from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) conducted in 2010. Of 8958 participants, 386 suspected OAG subjects underwent a VF test. For the training dataset, five OAG risk prediction models were created using multivariate logistic regression and an artificial neural network (ANN) with various clinical variables. Informative variables were selected by an algorithm of consistency subset evaluation, and cross validation was used to optimize performance. The test dataset was used subsequently to assess OAG-prediction performance using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic. RESULTS: Among five OAG risk prediction models, an ANN model with nine noncategorized factors had the greatest AUC (0.890). It predicted OAG with an accuracy of 84.0%, sensitivity of 78.3%, and specificity of 85.9%. It included four nonophthalmologic factors (sex, age, menopause, and duration of hypertension) and five ophthalmologic factors (IOP, spherical equivalent refractive errors, vertical cup-to-disc ratio, presence of superotemporal retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL] defect, and presence of inferotemporal RNFL defect). CONCLUSIONS: Though VF tests are considered the most important examination to distinguish OAG from GS, they sometimes are impractical to conduct for small private eye clinics and during large scale medical check-ups. The ANN approach may be a cost-effective screening tool for differentiating OAG patients from GS subjects.
PURPOSE: To increase the effectiveness of treating open-angle glaucoma (OAG), we tried to find a screening method of differentiating OAG from glaucoma suspect (GS) without a visual field (VF) test. METHODS: Data were collected from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) conducted in 2010. Of 8958 participants, 386 suspected OAG subjects underwent a VF test. For the training dataset, five OAG risk prediction models were created using multivariate logistic regression and an artificial neural network (ANN) with various clinical variables. Informative variables were selected by an algorithm of consistency subset evaluation, and cross validation was used to optimize performance. The test dataset was used subsequently to assess OAG-prediction performance using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic. RESULTS: Among five OAG risk prediction models, an ANN model with nine noncategorized factors had the greatest AUC (0.890). It predicted OAG with an accuracy of 84.0%, sensitivity of 78.3%, and specificity of 85.9%. It included four nonophthalmologic factors (sex, age, menopause, and duration of hypertension) and five ophthalmologic factors (IOP, spherical equivalent refractive errors, vertical cup-to-disc ratio, presence of superotemporal retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL] defect, and presence of inferotemporal RNFL defect). CONCLUSIONS: Though VF tests are considered the most important examination to distinguish OAG from GS, they sometimes are impractical to conduct for small private eye clinics and during large scale medical check-ups. The ANN approach may be a cost-effective screening tool for differentiating OAG patients from GS subjects.
Authors: Bo Ram Kim; Tae Keun Yoo; Hong Kyu Kim; Ik Hee Ryu; Jin Kuk Kim; In Sik Lee; Jung Soo Kim; Dong-Hyeok Shin; Young-Sang Kim; Bom Taeck Kim Journal: EPMA J Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 8.836
Authors: Sally L Baxter; Bharanidharan Radha Saseendrakumar; Paulina Paul; Jihoon Kim; Luca Bonomi; Tsung-Ting Kuo; Roxana Loperena; Francis Ratsimbazafy; Eric Boerwinkle; Mine Cicek; Cheryl R Clark; Elizabeth Cohn; Kelly Gebo; Kelsey Mayo; Stephen Mockrin; Sheri D Schully; Andrea Ramirez; Lucila Ohno-Machado Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 5.488
Authors: Margarita Labkovich; Megan Paul; Eliott Kim; Randal A Serafini; Shreyas Lakhtakia; Aly A Valliani; Andrew J Warburton; Aashay Patel; Davis Zhou; Bonnie Sklar; James Chelnis; Ebrahim Elahi Journal: Digit Health Date: 2022-05-06
Authors: Kyung Chul Yoon; Won Choi; Hyo Seok Lee; Sang-Duck Kim; Seung-Hyun Kim; Chan Yun Kim; Ki Ho Park; Young Jeung Park; Seung-Hee Baek; Su Jeong Song; Jae Pil Shin; Suk-Woo Yang; Seung-Young Yu; Jong Soo Lee; Key Hwan Lim; Kyung Won Oh; Se Woong Kang Journal: Korean J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-11-25