Literature DB >> 2609838

Choledochotomy: primary closure versus T-tube. A prospective trial.

D De Roover1, M Vanderveken, Y Gerard.   

Abstract

From January 1986 until December 1988 twenty two patients entered a prospective trial comparing primary closure versus T-tube drainage after exploratory choledochotomy for lithiasis, giving 11 primary closures (P) and 11 on T-tube (T). Both groups were well matched for age and risk factors. Preoperative values of alkaline phosphatase on day 2 and 7 were significantly lower in case of primary closure (p less than .025). In case of primary closure there was 1 bile leakage without peritonitis. In 9 T-tube biles additional micro-organisms appeared without clinical importance. In each group 1 infectious complication occurred. Post-operative hospital stay was 12 days (P) versus 14 (T) (p less than .05). There was 1 residual lithiasis (P), without detrimental effect on the healing of the primary closure. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction was performed. Within the given exclusion criteria closing a choledochotomy primarily is a safe and attractive procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2609838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Belg        ISSN: 0001-5458            Impact factor:   1.090


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of laparoscopic choledochotomy closure techniques.

Authors:  J S Wu; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Closure of the Common Duct -Endonasobiliary Drainage Tubes vs. T Tube: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Mehmood A Wani; Nisar A Chowdri; Sameer H Naqash; Fazl Q Parray; Rauf Ahmad Wani; Nazir A Wani
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 3.  Primary closure versus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Xiangsong Wu; Yong Yang; Ping Dong; Jun Gu; Jianhua Lu; Maolan Li; Jiasheng Mu; Wenguang Wu; Jiahua Yang; Lin Zhang; Qichen Ding; Yingbin Liu
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Is the use of T-tube necessary after laparoscopic choledochotomy?

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel-Raouf El-Geidie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Qian D Zhu; Chong L Tao; Meng T Zhou; Zheng P Yu; Hong Q Shi; Qi Y Zhang
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Hepatectomy with primary closure of common bile duct for hepatolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Chang-Ku Jia; Jie Weng; You-Ke Chen; Qing-Zhuang Yang; Yu Fu; Qi-Fan Qin; Wei-Ming Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy.

Authors:  Zhang Leida; Bie Ping; Wang Shuguang; He Yu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Primary closure of the common duct over endonasobiliary drainage tubes.

Authors:  Mehmood A Wani; Nisar A Chowdri; Sameer H Naqash; Nazir A Wani
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Single-session minimally invasive management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Ahmed AbdelRaouf ElGeidie
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Is a T-tube necessary after common bile duct exploration?

Authors:  Irfan Ahmed; Charita Pradhan; Ian J Beckingham; Adam J Brooks; Brian J Rowlands; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.