| Literature DB >> 21966134 |
Mehmood A Wani, Nisar A Chowdri, Sameer H Naqash, Fazl Q Parray, Rauf Ahmad Wani, Nazir A Wani.
Abstract
For the last century T tube drainage of the bile duct has remained standard practice following choledochlithotomy. It vents the biliary tree, provides route for cholangiography and management of residual stones. However, T tubes are associated with significant complications. This retrospective study compared the use of Endonasobiliary drainage tubes and the T tube in 66 patients who underwent open choledocholithotomy for effectiveness and complications. Both groups were statistically comparable. Only 15.15% patients in the Endonasobiliary drainage group, while 45.45% patients in the T tube group developed complications. Severe complications such as biliary peritonitis and intraperitoneal collections were noted only in the T tube group. The Endonasobiliary drainage tube was removed significantly earlier and patients from this group were discharged earlier as compared to those in the T tube. The Endonasobiliary drainage tube is as effective as the T tube in postoperative biliary drainage and allows cholangiograms to be performed. Its use is associated with less complications and it can be removed safely earlier than the T tube. Thus patients have a shorter time with tubes and can be discharged home earlier.Entities:
Keywords: Cholangiogram; Choledochlithotomy; Choledocholithiasis; Endonasobiliary drainage tube; T tube
Year: 2010 PMID: 21966134 PMCID: PMC3077137 DOI: 10.1007/s12262-010-0122-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Surg ISSN: 0973-9793 Impact factor: 0.656