| Literature DB >> 26097523 |
Nazarii M Kobyliak1, Tetyana M Falalyeyeva2, Olena G Kuryk3, Tetyana V Beregova2, Petro M Bodnar1, Nadiya M Zholobak4, Oleksandr B Shcherbakov4, Rostyslav V Bubnov5, Mykola Ya Spivak6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Male infertility has largely idiopathic, multifactorial origin. Oxidative stress is a major factor that affects spermatogenesis, in particular in aging. Cerium dioxide nanoparticles (CNPs) due to their antioxidative properties are promising to impact on the development of male infertility. The aims of this study were to investigate the effects of CNPs on fertility parameters in 24-month male rats and to overview relevant literature in the field of personalized treatments, predictive diagnosis, and preventive measures for male health and fertility.Entities:
Keywords: Age-related male infertility; Infertility biomarkers; Men health; Nanocrystalline cerium dioxide; Oxidative–antioxidative balance; Predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine; Seminal plasma; Translation; Ultrasound
Year: 2015 PMID: 26097523 PMCID: PMC4475301 DOI: 10.1186/s13167-015-0034-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EPMA J ISSN: 1878-5077 Impact factor: 6.543
Fig. 1Schematic model of catalase-like (A1, A2) and superoxide dismutase-like (B) activities of CNP (left) and corresponding changes in ceria lattice [2] (right)
Fig. 2High-resolution electron micrograph (HRTEM) of ceria nanoparticles (4–5 nm) stabilized by citrate (a). The model of lattice and 3D spatial distribution of the effective potential of the citrate anion adsorbed on the cluster Ce7O12 (b) [1]
Johnsen score for spermatogenesis assessment
| Score | Histological criteria |
|---|---|
| 10 | Full spermatogenesis |
| 9 | Slightly impaired spermatogenesis, many late spermatids, disorganized epithelium |
| 8 | Less than five spermatozoa per tubule, few late spermatids |
| 7 | No spermatozoa, no late spermatids, many early spermatids |
| 6 | No spermatozoa, no late spermatids, few early spermatids |
| 5 | No spermatozoa or spermatids, many spermatocytes |
| 4 | No spermatozoa or spermatids, few spermatocytes |
| 3 | Spermatogonia only |
| 2 | No germinal cells, Sertoli cells only |
| 1 | No seminiferous epithelium |
Total body weight, absolute and relative reproductive organ weights of male rats
| Parameters | Control ( | Citrate ( | CNPs ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute weight | ||||
| Total body weight, g | 396.2 ± 6.48 | 405.6 ± 9.26 | 403.5 ± 7.45 | 0.676 |
| Testis, mg | 2991.3 ± 98.91 | 2997.5 ± 107.72 | 3047.5 ± 70.02 | 0.897 |
| Epididymis, mg | 985.7 ± 28.5 | 970.4 ± 21.78 | 987.0 ± 37.74 | 0.910 |
| Seminal vesicle, mg | 727.1 ± 9.74 | 756.4 ± 10.35 | 754.8 ± 9.85 | 0.084 |
| Ventral prostate, mg | 498.02 ± 8.04 | 497.87 ± 7.75 | 492.61 ± 8.04 | 0.832 |
| Relative weight | ||||
| Testis, mg/100 g | 7.53 ± 0.18 | 7.37 ± 0.16 | 7.56 ± 0.18 | 0.730 |
| Epididymis, mg/100 g | 2.48 ± 0.05 | 2.39 ± 0.04 | 2.44 ± 0.07 | 0.551 |
| Seminal vesicle, mg/100 g | 1.83 ± 0.01 | 1.86 ± 0.03 | 1.86 ± 0.03 | 0.614 |
| Ventral prostate, mg/100 g | 1.25 ± 0.01 | 1.21 ± 0.01 | 1.22 ± 0.02 | 0.252 |
Values expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA test was performed
Fig. 3Testosterone and LH level in rats of different experimental groups. Values expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey test was performed. a, b Mean values with the same letter do not differ statistically; values <0.05 were considered significant
Epididymal sperm parameters in different experimental groups
| Sperm parameters | Control ( | Citrate ( | CNPs ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration (106/mL) | 37.11 ± 1.32а | 37.97 ± 1.04а | 44.05 ± 1.49b |
| Rapid motility, % (grade A) | 29.21 ± 1.3а | 30.67 ± 0.72а | 37.96 ± 1.5b |
| Slow motility, % (grade B) | 25.56 ± 2.03а | 25.57 ± 1.63а | 29.31 ± 1.08а |
| Progressive motility, % (grade A + B) | 54.77 ± 1.81а | 56.24 ± 1.38а | 67.27 ± 1.78b |
| Non-progressive motility, % (grade C) | 25.02 ± 1.49а | 23.87 ± 0.84а | 17.61 ± 1.24b |
| Immotile sperm, % (grade D) | 20.21 ± 1.58а | 19.86 ± 1.11а | 15.11 ± 1.02b |
| Viability, % | 83.36 ± 1.64а | 85.37 ± 1.33аb | 89.3 ± 1.18b |
| Normal morphology, % | 83.25 ± 1.28а | 84.4 ± 1.22аb | 88.85 ± 1.35b |
| Abnormalities of the sperm head, % | 5.95 ± 0.57а | 5.15 ± 0.57аb | 3.4 ± 0.64b |
| Abnormalities of the flagellum, % | 10.8 ± 0.87а | 10.55 ± 0.9аb | 7.75 ± 0.77b |
Values expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey test was performed. Mean values with the same letter do not differ statistically; p values <0.05 were considered significant
Fig. 4Light microscopy of cross sections of H&E stained testis. a, b Control group; c, d citrate-treated group; e, f CNP-treated group. Regular seminiferous tubules (a) with atrophy of spermatogenic epithelium. Irregular seminiferous tubules where spermatogenic layer is represented by focal and low amounts of cells which does not provide normal maturation of sperm; in the lumen, small amount of spermatozoa (b–d). There is a partial recovery of spermatogenic layer in the seminiferous tubules compared with the control group—observed a higher amounts of cells which are placed in several rows; the presence of spermatozoa in the lumen (e, f). Final magnification: ×400
Fig. 5Assessment of spermatogenesis using Johnson score. Values expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey test was performed. a, b Mean values with the same letter do not differ statistically; p values <0.05 were considered significant
Products of lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes activities in different experimental groups
| Parameters | Control ( | Citrate ( | CNPs ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conjugated dienes, nmol × mg protein−1 | 80.79 ± 6.02a | 77.9 ± 4.3a | 37.07 ± 3.27b |
| TBA-reactive substances, nmol × mg protein−1 | 41.22 ± 3.02a | 37.94 ± 3.59a | 27.06 ± 2.55b |
| Schiff bases, units × mg protein−1 | 5.61 ± 0.51a | 5.26 ± 0.4a | 1.82 ± 0.54b |
| SOD, units × min−1 × mg protein−1 | 0.11 ± 0.01a | 0.11 ± 0.01a | 0.16 ± 0.01b |
| Catalase, nmol × min−1 × mg protein−1 | 0.44 ± 0.04a | 0.45 ± 0.04a | 0.63 ± 0.05b |
Values expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by Tukey test was performed. Mean values with the same letter do not differ statistically; p values <0.05 were considered significant
Fig. 6Ultrasound assessment of testes in rats. a View of ultrasound technique to obtain transversal scans of testes in rat. b Transversal US scans of testes (T) and linear measurements
Fig. 7Ultrasound assessment of testes in infertile men—imaging biomarkers. a Testicular microlithiasis (arrow). b Testicular tumor—seminoma (T), tumor is better visualized using sonoelastography (performed on Hitachi US equipment) that depicts stiff lesion in the parenchyma (colored as blue on the left side of the figure). c Testicle perfusion—Doppler. d Doppler spectrum of artery in testis. e Hydrocele—on US scan are visualized testicles (T) and effusion around both testicles