Literature DB >> 26096898

Materials used to simulate physical properties of human skin.

A K Dąbrowska1, G-M Rotaru1, S Derler1, F Spano1, M Camenzind1, S Annaheim1, R Stämpfli1, M Schmid1, R M Rossi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For many applications in research, material development and testing, physical skin models are preferable to the use of human skin, because more reliable and reproducible results can be obtained.
PURPOSE: This article gives an overview of materials applied to model physical properties of human skin to encourage multidisciplinary approaches for more realistic testing and improved understanding of skin-material interactions.
METHODS: The literature databases Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched using the terms 'skin model', 'skin phantom', 'skin equivalent', 'synthetic skin', 'skin substitute', 'artificial skin', 'skin replica', and 'skin model substrate.' Articles addressing material developments or measurements that include the replication of skin properties or behaviour were analysed.
RESULTS: It was found that the most common materials used to simulate skin are liquid suspensions, gelatinous substances, elastomers, epoxy resins, metals and textiles. Nano- and micro-fillers can be incorporated in the skin models to tune their physical properties.
CONCLUSION: While numerous physical skin models have been reported, most developments are research field-specific and based on trial-and-error methods. As the complexity of advanced measurement techniques increases, new interdisciplinary approaches are needed in future to achieve refined models which realistically simulate multiple properties of human skin.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  human skin; physical skin models; properties of skin; simulation of skin

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26096898     DOI: 10.1111/srt.12235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skin Res Technol        ISSN: 0909-752X            Impact factor:   2.365


  21 in total

1.  Multimodal 3D cancer-mimicking optical phantom.

Authors:  Gennifer T Smith; Kristen L Lurie; Dimitar V Zlatev; Joseph C Liao; Audrey K Ellerbee Bowden
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Development of a Smartphone-Based Skin Simulation Model for Medical Education.

Authors:  Roshan Dsouza; Darold R Spillman; Scott Barrows; Thomas Golemon; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.929

3.  A personalized FEM model for reproducible measurement of anti-inflammatory drugs in transdermal administration to knee.

Authors:  Pasquale Arpaia; Federica Crauso; Mirco Frosolone; Massimo Mariconda; Simone Minucci; Nicola Moccaldi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Ciprofloxacin-loaded dissolving polymeric microneedles as a potential therapeutic for the treatment of S. aureus skin infections.

Authors:  Sharif Abdelghany; Walhan Alshaer; Yazan Al Thaher; Maram Al Fawares; Amal G Al-Bakri; Saja Zuriekat; Randa Sh Mansour
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 5.  Microphysiological systems for the modeling of wound healing and evaluation of pro-healing therapies.

Authors:  Halston E Deal; Ashley C Brown; Michael A Daniele
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 6.331

6.  Topical and transdermal delivery with diseased human skin: passive and iontophoretic delivery of hydrocortisone into psoriatic and eczematous skin.

Authors:  Behnam Dasht Bozorg; Sonalika A Bhattaccharjee; Mahadevabharath R Somayaji; Ajay K Banga
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.671

Review 7.  Skin models for the testing of transdermal drugs.

Authors:  Eman Abd; Shereen A Yousef; Michael N Pastore; Krishna Telaprolu; Yousuf H Mohammed; Sarika Namjoshi; Jeffrey E Grice; Michael S Roberts
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-19

8.  Dynamic mechanical interaction between injection liquid and human tissue simulant induced by needle-free injection of a highly focused microjet.

Authors:  Yuta Miyazaki; Masashi Usawa; Shuma Kawai; Jingzu Yee; Masakazu Muto; Yoshiyuki Tagawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Inkjet-Printed Graphene/PEDOT:PSS Temperature Sensors on a Skin-Conformable Polyurethane Substrate.

Authors:  Tiina Vuorinen; Juha Niittynen; Timo Kankkunen; Thomas M Kraft; Matti Mäntysalo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Assessment of Silver Levels in a Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Dressing: In Vitro and In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Prathamesh M Kharkar; Sandra N Osborne; Scout L Stern; Aaron Pleitner; K Mark Wiencek; Kristine M Kieswetter
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.