Literature DB >> 26096061

A nationwide assessment of outcomes after bile duct reconstruction.

Mariam F Eskander1, Lindsay A Bliss1, Osman K Yousafzai1, Susanna W L de Geus1, Sing Chau Ng1, Mark P Callery1, Tara S Kent1, A James Moser1, Khalid Khwaja1, Jennifer F Tseng1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bile duct reconstruction (BDR) is used to manage benign and malignant neoplasms, congenital anomalies, bile duct injuries and other non-malignant diseases. BDR outcomes overall, by year, and by indication were compared.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of Nationwide Inpatient Sample discharges (2004-2011) including ICD-9 codes for BDR. All statistical testing was performed using survey weighting. Univariate analysis of admission characteristics by chi square testing. Multivariate modelling for inpatient complications and inpatient death by logistic regression.
RESULTS: Identified 67 160 weighted patient admissions: 2.5% congenital anomaly, 37.4% malignant neoplasm, 2.3% benign neoplasm, 9.9% biliary injury, 47.9% other non-malignant disease. Most BDRs were performed in teaching hospitals (69.6%) but only 25% at centres with a BDR volume more than 35/year. 32.3% involved ≥ 1 complication, and 84.7% were discharges home. There was a 4.2% inpatient death rate. The complication rate increased but the inpatient death rate decreased over time. The rates of acute renal failure increased. Significant multivariate predictors of inpatient death include indication of biliary injury or malignancy, and predictors of any complication include public insurance and non-elective admission.
CONCLUSION: This is the first national description of BDRs using a large database. In this diverse sampling, both procedure indication and patient characteristics influence morbidity and mortality.
© 2015 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26096061      PMCID: PMC4557648          DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  24 in total

1.  Results of a new strategy for reconstruction of biliary injuries having an isolated right-sided component.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; D D Picus; J A Drebin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Choledochoduodenostomy: reappraisal in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  Kamran Khalid; Mohammad Shafi; Haroon M Dar; Khalid M Durrani
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Use the duodenum, it’s right there: a retrospective cohort study comparing biliary reconstruction using either the jejunum or the duodenum.

Authors:  J Bart Rose; Phillip Bilderback; Tal Raphaeli; William Traverso; Scott Helton; John A Ryan; Thomas Biehl
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; G B Melton; J L Cameron; H A Pitt; K A Campbell; M A Talamini; P A Sauter; J Coleman; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  In-hospital mortality after resection of biliary tract cancer in the United States.

Authors:  James E Carroll; Zachary M Hurwitz; Jessica P Simons; James T McPhee; Sing Chau Ng; Shimul A Shah; Waddah B Al-Refaie; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Is there a role for endoscopic therapy as a definitive treatment for post-laparoscopic bile duct injuries?

Authors:  Javairiah Fatima; Joshua G Barton; Travis E Grotz; Zhimin Geng; William S Harmsen; Marianne Huebner; Todd H Baron; Michael L Kendrick; John H Donohue; Florencia G Que; David M Nagorney; Michael B Farnell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Primary sclerosing cholangitis: role of extrahepatic biliary resection.

Authors:  Timothy M Pawlik; Vanessa A Olbrecht; Henry A Pitt; Ana L Gleisner; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; John L Cameron
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Long-term outcome of endoscopic therapy in patients with bile duct injury after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Andreas Weber; Hubertus Feussner; Franziska Winkelmann; Jörg Rüdiger Siewert; Roland M Schmid; Christian Prinz
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 4.029

9.  Patient readmission and mortality after surgery for hepato-pancreato-biliary malignancies.

Authors:  Eric B Schneider; Omar Hyder; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenzo Hirose; Michael A Choti; Martin A Makary; Joseph M Herman; John L Cameron; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Early complications after biliary enteric anastomosis for benign diseases: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Syed Nabeel Zafar; Muhammad Rizwan Khan; Rushna Raza; Muhammad N Khan; Mahwash Kasi; Ammar Rafiq; Omer H Jamy
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  1 in total

1.  Risk factors for increased resource utilization and critical care complications in patients undergoing hepaticojejunostomy for biliary injuries.

Authors:  Nicholas Jackson; Adam Dugan; Daniel Davenport; Michael Daily; Malay Shah; Jonathan Berger; Roberto Gedaly
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.647

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.