Literature DB >> 26094181

Impact of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy learning curve on operative time, perioperative complications and short term results.

David Vandendriessche1, Géraldine Giraudet2, Jean-Philippe Lucot2, Hélène Behal3, Michel Cosson2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) learning is a challenge for unexperienced surgeons, since complications occurrence and anatomical results could depend from surgeon's experience. The aim of this study was to describe LSCP characteristics, perioperative complications and short term anatomical results when LSCP was performed by LSCP-experienced surgeons or trainees. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients who underwent LSCP in our surgical unit in the last ten years were included. Patients were excluded if laparotomy was performed without any laparoscopic time. Interventions were divided into LSCP experienced surgeons (who had performed at least 30 procedures) and trainees (residents, fellows, and surgeons with less than 30 procedures). Main outcomes were operative time, peroperative complications (included conversions to open or vaginal surgery, bladder and vaginal perforation, epigastric vessels injury and hemorrhage) early postoperative complications, mesh complications and anatomical results at three months.
RESULTS: 492 patients were included, 108 in the trainee group and 384 in the LSCP-experienced group. Groups were comparable for demographics, preoperative clinical examination and surgery characteristics. Average operative time was significantly higher in trainees group than in LSCP-experienced group (251 versus 178 min (p<0.0001)). There was no difference in open surgery conversion rate (5.6% versus 3.9%, p=0.42) or peroperative complication occurrence (4.7% versus 4.6%, p=0.98). Bladder perforations were more frequent in trainee group but difference was not statistically significant (3.7% versus 1.3%, p=0.11). 98% patients were assessed at three months. Overall anatomical success rate was 94.9%. There was no difference in anatomical failure rate between trainee group and LSCP experienced surgeons group (respectively 4.7% versus 5.2%, p=0.82), neither in mesh complication rate (3.9% versus 2.8%, p=0.77).
CONCLUSION: LSCP learning in an experimented surgical team induces high operative time, but remains safe for patient.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Laparoscopic sacrocolpofixation; Learning curve

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26094181     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  9 in total

1.  A new affordable and easy-to-make pelvic model for training in complex urogynecological laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Tamara Serdinšek; Branka Žegura Andrić; Igor But
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Trends in apical prolapse surgery between 2010 and 2016 in Denmark.

Authors:  Karen Ruben Husby; Gunnar Lose; Niels Klarskov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications.

Authors:  Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Evidence to justify retention of transvaginal mesh: comparison between laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and transvaginal Elevate™ mesh.

Authors:  Valérie To; Pattaya Hengrasmee; Alan Lam; Georgina Luscombe; Anna Lawless; Justin Lam
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.

Authors:  Eduardo Bataller; Cristina Ros; Sonia Anglès; Miriam Gallego; Montserrat Espuña-Pons; Francisco Carmona
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Nurse-led coordinated surgical care pathways for cost optimization of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: medico-economic analysis of the UroCCR-25 AMBU-REIN study.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Bernhard; Grégoire Robert; Solène Ricard; Julien Rogier; Cécile Degryse; Clément Michiels; Gaëlle Margue; Peggy Blanc; Eric Alezra; Vincent Estrade; Grégoire Capon; Franck Bladou; Jean-Marie Ferriere
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.

Authors:  Vlad I Tica; Andrei A Tica; Rudy L De Wilde
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 8.  Medium-Term Anatomical and Functional Results of Isolated Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse during the Early Learning Curve.

Authors:  Shashank Shekhar; Shuchita Goyal; Manu Goel; Charu Sharma; Manisha Jhirwal
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-10-26

9.  A 15-Minute Incremental Increase in Operative Duration Is Associated With an Additional Risk of Complications Within 30 Days After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Avinesh Agarwalla; Anirudh K Gowd; Kaisen Yao; Daniel D Bohl; Nirav H Amin; Nikhil N Verma; Brian Forsythe; Joseph N Liu
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-07-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.