Madalina Opreanu1, Chingping Wan2, Vini Singh1, Negar Salehi1, Jaffri Ahmad1, Steven J Szymkiewicz2, Ranjan K Thakur3. 1. Sparrow Thoracic and Cardiovascular Institute, Michigan State University, Lansing, Michigan. 2. Zoll Medical Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Sparrow Thoracic and Cardiovascular Institute, Michigan State University, Lansing, Michigan. Electronic address: thakur@msu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are common in patients awaiting heart transplantation (HT), and the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is often used for primary prevention in this setting. Use of ICDs in these patients is not without risks and is sometimes contraindicated. The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) may be a reasonable alternative to bridge the period of risk leading up to HT. METHODS: We obtained a convenience sample of patients prescribed an WCD as a bridge therapy to HT. The available data consisted of demographics, cardiac transplantation status, associated comorbidities, device use, device-stored electrocardiogram (ECG) and reason for discontinuing the WCD. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17 and GraphPad PRISM 5. RESULTS: The registry included 121 patients consisting of 83 (69%) men and 38 (31%) women. The mean age was 44 ± 18 years. Mean ejection fraction was 25 ± 15%. Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (CMP) was the underlying diagnosis in 67 (55%) patients, whereas 21 (17%) patients had ischemic CMP and 33 (27%) had a mixed or uncharacterized CMP. New York Heart Association Class III heart failure was present in 32% and 34% were in Class IV. Eighty-eight patients (73%) were being evaluated for HT or were on an HT waiting list, and 33 patients (27%) had had a prior HT, experienced rejection, and were awaiting re-transplantation. The patients wore the WCD for an average of 127 ± 392 days (median 39 days) with average daily use of 17 ± 7 hours (median 20 hours). Seven patients (6%) received appropriate WCD shocks. Fifty-one patients (42%) ended use after ICD implantation and 13 patients (11%) after HT. There were 11 deaths (9%). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients on the HT waiting list will have VA. WCD use in our study showed high compliance and efficacy and a low complication rate, suggesting that the WCD is a reasonable bridge therapy for preventing SCD in patients awaiting HT.
BACKGROUND: Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are common in patients awaiting heart transplantation (HT), and the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is often used for primary prevention in this setting. Use of ICDs in these patients is not without risks and is sometimes contraindicated. The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) may be a reasonable alternative to bridge the period of risk leading up to HT. METHODS: We obtained a convenience sample of patients prescribed an WCD as a bridge therapy to HT. The available data consisted of demographics, cardiac transplantation status, associated comorbidities, device use, device-stored electrocardiogram (ECG) and reason for discontinuing the WCD. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17 and GraphPad PRISM 5. RESULTS: The registry included 121 patients consisting of 83 (69%) men and 38 (31%) women. The mean age was 44 ± 18 years. Mean ejection fraction was 25 ± 15%. Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (CMP) was the underlying diagnosis in 67 (55%) patients, whereas 21 (17%) patients had ischemic CMP and 33 (27%) had a mixed or uncharacterized CMP. New York Heart Association Class III heart failure was present in 32% and 34% were in Class IV. Eighty-eight patients (73%) were being evaluated for HT or were on an HT waiting list, and 33 patients (27%) had had a prior HT, experienced rejection, and were awaiting re-transplantation. The patients wore the WCD for an average of 127 ± 392 days (median 39 days) with average daily use of 17 ± 7 hours (median 20 hours). Seven patients (6%) received appropriate WCD shocks. Fifty-one patients (42%) ended use after ICD implantation and 13 patients (11%) after HT. There were 11 deaths (9%). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients on the HT waiting list will have VA. WCD use in our study showed high compliance and efficacy and a low complication rate, suggesting that the WCD is a reasonable bridge therapy for preventing SCD in patients awaiting HT.
Authors: Ahmad Masri; Ahmed M Altibi; Sebhat Erqou; Mohammad A Zmaili; Ala Saleh; Raed Al-Adham; Karam Ayoub; Moaaz Baghal; Laith Alkukhun; Amr F Barakat; Sandeep Jain; Samir Saba; Evan Adelstein Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2019-01-30
Authors: Maura M Zylla; Henrike A K Hillmann; Tanja Proctor; Meinhard Kieser; Eberhard Scholz; Edgar Zitron; Hugo A Katus; Dierk Thomas Journal: Heart Vessels Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Antonio Bisignani; Silvana De Bonis; Giovanni San Pasquale; Laura Candreva; Cristina Franchin; Maurizio Malacrida; Giovanni Bisignani Journal: Clin Case Rep Date: 2017-10-07
Authors: Jackson J Liang; Nicole R Bianco; Daniele Muser; Andres Enriquez; Pasquale Santangeli; Benjamin A D'Souza Journal: World J Cardiol Date: 2018-04-26
Authors: Henrike Aenne Katrin Hillmann; Stephan Hohmann; Johanna Mueller-Leisse; Christos Zormpas; Jörg Eiringhaus; Johann Bauersachs; Christian Veltmann; David Duncker Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 3.576