Literature DB >> 26093979

Monovalent type-1 oral poliovirus vaccine given at short intervals in Pakistan: a randomised controlled, four-arm, open-label, non-inferiority trial.

Fatima Mir1, Farheen Quadri1, Ondrej Mach2, Imran Ahmed1, Zaid Bhatti1, Asia Khan1, Najeeb Ur Rehman1, Elias Durry3, Maha Salama2, Steven M Oberste4, William C Weldon4, Roland W Sutter2, Anita K M Zaidi5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Supplementary immunisation activities with oral poliovirus vaccines (OPVs) are usually separated by 4 week intervals; however, shorter intervals have been used in security-compromised areas and for rapid outbreak responses. We assessed the immunogenicity of monovalent type-1 oral poliovirus vaccine (mOPV1) given at shorter than usual intervals in Karachi, Pakistan.
METHODS: This was a multicentre, randomised, controlled, four-arm, open-label, non-inferiority trial done at five primary health-care centres in low-income communities in and around Karachi, Pakistan. Eligible participants were healthy newborn babies with a birthweight of at least 2·5 kg, for whom informed consent was provided by their parent or guardian, and lived less than 30 km from the study clinic. After receiving a birth dose of trivalent OPV, we enrolled and randomly assigned newborn babies (1:1:1:1) to receive two doses of mOPV1 with an interval of 1 week (mOPV1-1 week), 2 weeks (mOPV1-2 weeks), or 4 weeks (mOPV1-4 weeks) between doses, or two doses of bivalent OPV (bOPV) with an interval of 4 weeks between doses (bOPV-4 weeks). We gave the first study dose of OPV at age 6 weeks. We did the randomisation with a centrally generated, computerised allocation sequence with blocks of 16; participants' families and study physicians could not feasibly be masked to the allocations. Trial participants were excluded from local supplementary immunisation activities during the study period. The primary outcome was non-inferiority (within a 20% margin) between groups in seroconversion to type-1 poliovirus. The primary and safety analyses were done in the per-protocol population of infants who received all three doses of vaccine. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01586572, and is closed to new participants.
FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2012, and May 31, 2013, we enrolled 1009 newborn babies, and randomly assigned 829 (82%) to treatment. 554 (67%) of the 829 babies were included in the per-protocol analysis. Proportions of seroconversion to type-1 poliovirus were 107/135 (79%, 95% CI 72·4-86·1) with mOPV1-1 week, 108/135 (80%, 73·2-86·8) with mOPV1-2 weeks, 129/148 (87%, 80·9-92·0) with mOPV1-4 weeks, and 107/136 (79%, 71·8-85·6) with bOPV-4 weeks. Non-inferiority was shown between groups and no significant differences were noted. Ten participants died during the trial. Seven of these deaths occurred during the lead-in period before randomisation (two from diarrhoea, five from unknown causes). Three infants died from sepsis after random assignment. No deaths were attributed to the procedures or vaccines. Additionally, we noted no events of vaccine-associated paralysis.
INTERPRETATION: We identified no significant differences in responses to mOPV1 given with shorter intervals between doses than with the standard 4 week intervals. The short-interval strategy could be particularly beneficial when temporary windows of opportunity for safe access can be granted in areas of conflict--eg, during cease-fire periods. In such situations, we recommend shortening the interval between OPV doses to 7 days. FUNDING: World Health Organization.
Copyright © 2015 World Health Organization. Published by Elsevier Ltd/Inc/BV. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26093979      PMCID: PMC4644524          DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00093-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis        ISSN: 1473-3099            Impact factor:   25.071


  34 in total

1.  Heterotypic antibody response after feeding of monovalent attenuated live poliovaccine.

Authors:  A ASHKENAZI; J L MELNICK
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1962-12-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  A liquid hexavalent combined vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, Haemophilus influenzae type B and hepatitis B: review of immunogenicity and safety.

Authors:  Eric Mallet; Bernd H Belohradsky; Rosanna Lagos; Leif Gothefors; Patrice Camier; Jean-Pierre Carrière; Güler Kanra; Agnès Hoffenbach; Jacques Langue; François Undreiner; François Roussel; Philippe Reinert; Carl-Erik Flodmark; Silvia Stojanov; Johannes Liese; Myron M Levine; Alma Muñoz; Florian Schödel; Luc Hessel
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Prevalence of vaccine-derived polioviruses in sewage and river water in South Africa.

Authors:  D N Pavlov; W B Van Zyl; J Van Heerden; W O K Grabow; M M Ehlers
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Monovalent type 1 oral poliovirus vaccine in newborns.

Authors:  Nasr el-Sayed; Yehia el-Gamal; Ahmed-Amr Abbassy; Iman Seoud; Maha Salama; Amr Kandeel; Elham Hossny; Ahmed Shawky; Heba Abou Hussein; Mark A Pallansch; Harrie G A M van der Avoort; Anthony H Burton; Meghana Sreevatsava; Pradeep Malankar; Mohamed H Wahdan; Roland W Sutter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Effect of diarrhea on the humoral response to oral polio vaccination.

Authors:  J A Myaux; L Unicomb; R E Besser; J F Modlin; A Uzma; A M Islam; M Santosham
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Progress toward poliomyelitis eradication - Afghanistan and Pakistan, 2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Immunisation policies and programmes in Europe.

Authors:  D Salisbury
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.856

8.  Factors affecting the immunogenicity of oral poliovirus vaccine: a prospective evaluation in Brazil and the Gambia. World Health Organization Collaborative Study Group on Oral Poliovirus Vaccine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Priming after a fractional dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine.

Authors:  Sonia Resik; Alina Tejeda; Roland W Sutter; Manuel Diaz; Luis Sarmiento; Nilda Alemañi; Gloria Garcia; Magilé Fonseca; Lai Heng Hung; Anna-Lea Kahn; Anthony Burton; J Mauricio Landaverde; R Bruce Aylward
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Serological response and poliovirus excretion following different combined oral and inactivated poliovirus vaccines immunization schedules.

Authors:  Isabelle Parent du Châtelet; Anwar T Merchant; Susan Fisher-Hoch; Stephen P Luby; Stanley A Plotkin; Tariq Moatter; Mubina Agboatwalla; Joseph B McCormick
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  6 in total

1.  Immunogenicity and safety evaluation of bivalent types 1 and 3 oral poliovirus vaccine by comparing different poliomyelitis vaccination schedules in China: A randomized controlled non-inferiority clinical trial.

Authors:  Jingjun Qiu; Yunkai Yang; Lirong Huang; Ling Wang; Zhiwei Jiang; Jian Gong; Wei Wang; Hongyan Wang; Shaohong Guo; Chanjuan Li; Shuyuan Wei; Zhaojun Mo; Jielai Xia
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Immunogenicity of Different Routine Poliovirus Vaccination Schedules: A Randomized, Controlled Trial in Karachi, Pakistan.

Authors:  Ali F Saleem; Ondrej Mach; Mohammad T Yousafzai; Asia Khan; William C Weldon; M Steven Oberste; Syed S Zaidi; Muhammad M Alam; Farheen Quadri; Roland W Sutter; Anita K M Zaidi
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Population sensitivity of acute flaccid paralysis and environmental surveillance for serotype 1 poliovirus in Pakistan: an observational study.

Authors:  Kathleen M O'Reilly; Robert Verity; Elias Durry; Humayun Asghar; Salmaan Sharif; Sohail Z Zaidi; M Zubair M Wadood; Ousmane M Diop; Hiro Okayasu; Rana M Safdar; Nicholas C Grassly
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Risk factors and short-term projections for serotype-1 poliomyelitis incidence in Pakistan: A spatiotemporal analysis.

Authors:  Natalie A Molodecky; Isobel M Blake; Kathleen M O'Reilly; Mufti Zubair Wadood; Rana M Safdar; Amy Wesolowski; Caroline O Buckee; Ananda S Bandyopadhyay; Hiromasa Okayasu; Nicholas C Grassly
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Oral polio vaccine response in the MAL-ED birth cohort study: Considerations for polio eradication strategies.

Authors:  William K Pan; Jessica C Seidman; Asad Ali; Christel Hoest; Carl Mason; Dinesh Mondal; Stacey L Knobler; Pascal Bessong
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Does Simultaneous Administration of Bivalent (Types 1 and 3) Oral Poliovirus Vaccine and Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Induce Mucosal Cross-immunity to Poliovirus Type 2?

Authors:  Sonia Resik; Alina Tejeda; Ondrej Mach; Magile Fonseca; Manuel Diaz; Nilda Alemany; Lai Heng Hung; Yoan Aleman; Ileana Mesa; Gloria Garcia; Roland W Sutter
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 9.079

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.