Literature DB >> 26093647

Image-based monitoring of targeted biopsy-proven prostate cancer on active surveillance: 11-year experience.

Sunao Shoji1,2, Osamu Ukimura3, Andre Luis de Castro Abreu1, Arnaud Marien1, Toru Matsugasumi1, Duke Bahn1, Inderbir S Gill1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report our 11-year experience of Active Surveillance (AS) program focusing on modern transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-based monitoring of targeted biopsy-proven cancer lesion.
METHODS: Consecutive patients on AS, who had targeted biopsy-proven lesion followed by at least a repeat surveillance biopsy and three times TRUS monitoring of the identical visible lesion, were included. Doppler grade of blood flow signal within the lesion was classified from grade 0 to 3. Biopsy-proven progression was defined as upgrade of Gleason score or 25% or greater increase in cancer core involvement.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were included in this study. Clinical variables (median) included age (61 years), clinical stage (T1c, 42;T2, 8), PSA (4.6 ng/ml), and Gleason score (3 + 3, n = 41;3 + 4, n = 9). Of the 50 patients, 34 demonstrated pathological progression at a median follow-up of 4.4 years. In comparing between without (n = 16) and with (n = 34) pathological progression, there were significant differences in cancer core involvement at entry (p = 0.003), the major axis diameter (p = 0.001) and minor axis diameter (p = 0.001) of the visible lesion at entry, increase in the major axis diameter (p = 0.005) and minor axis diameter (p = 0.013), and upgrade of Doppler grade (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis for predicting pathological progression, the increase (≥25%) in diameter of biopsy-proven lesion (hazard ratio, 15.314; p = 0.023) and upgrade of Doppler grade (hazard ratio, 37.409; p = 0.019) were significant risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal monitoring of the TRUS-visible biopsy-proven cancer provides a new opportunity to perform per-lesion-based AS. The increase in diameter and upgrade of Doppler grade of the lesion were significant risk factors for biopsy-proven progression on AS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Biopsy; Imaging; Prostate cancer; Transrectal ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26093647      PMCID: PMC9084468          DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1619-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   3.661


  28 in total

1.  The value of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound in predicting the nature of prostate diseases and the Gleason score of prostate cancer by a subjective blood flow grading scale.

Authors:  Hong Wei Zhao; Jun Hang Luo; Hui Xiong Xu; Dao Hu Wang; Ying Rong Lai; Mian Ni Chen; Jian Yao Lv; Xiao Yan Xie; Ming De Lu; Wei Chen
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Manually controlled targeted prostate biopsy with real-time fusion imaging of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound: an early experience.

Authors:  Sunao Shoji; Shinichiro Hiraiwa; Jun Endo; Kazunobu Hashida; Tetsuro Tomonaga; Mayura Nakano; Tomoko Sugiyama; Takuma Tajiri; Toshiro Terachi; Toyoaki Uchida
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 3.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: for whom?

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of clinically low risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Oguz Akin; Asim Afaq; Debra Goldman; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Amita Shukla-Dave; James Eastham; Peter Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Richard Whittington; S Bruce Malkowicz; Kerri Cote; Marian Loffredo; Delray Schultz; Ming-Hui Chen; John E Tomaszewski; Andrew A Renshaw; Alan Wein; Jerome P Richie
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Operator is an independent predictor of detecting prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Ants Toi; Gina A Lockwood; Andrew Evans; Antonio Finelli; Martin O'Malley; Myles Margolis; Sangeet Ghai; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Prostate tumor volume measurement with combined T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted MR: correlation with pathologic tumor volume.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Hedvig Hricak; Samson W Fine; Oguz Akin; Amita Shukla-Dave; Nicole M Ishill; Chaya S Moskowitz; Joanna E Grater; Victor E Reuter; Kristen L Zakian; Karim A Touijer; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Active surveillance; a reasonable management alternative for patients with prostate cancer: the Miami experience.

Authors:  Mark S Soloway; Cynthia T Soloway; Steve Williams; Rajinikanth Ayyathurai; Bruce Kava; Murugesan Manoharan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Prostate cancer: is inapparent tumor at endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging a favorable prognostic finding in patients who select active surveillance?

Authors:  Alvin R Cabrera; Fergus V Coakley; Antonio C Westphalen; Ying Lu; Shoujun Zhao; Katsuto Shinohara; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The importance of tumor palpability and transrectal ultrasonographic appearance in the contemporary clinical staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Janet E Cowan; Benjamin J Davies; Peter R Carroll; Katsuto Shinohara
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 3.498

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Internal Fusion: exact correlation of transrectal ultrasound images of the prostate by detailed landmarks over time for targeted biopsies or follow-up.

Authors:  Yanqi Xie; Theodoros Tokas; Björn Grabski; Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Development and future prospective of treatment for localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Sunao Shoji; Norihiro Koizumi; Soichiro Yuzuriha; Tatsuo Kano; Takahiro Ogawa; Mayura Nakano; Masayoshi Kawakami; Masahiro Nitta; Masanori Hasegawa; Akira Miyajima
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 3.  The role of diagnostic ultrasound imaging for patients with known prostate cancer within an active surveillance pathway: A systematic review.

Authors:  Pamela Parker; Maureen Twiddy; Paul Whybrow; Alan Rigby; Matthew Simms
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 4.  Current status and future prospective of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: development of multiparametric MRI, MRI-TRUS fusion image-guided biopsy, and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Sunao Shoji; Shinichiro Hiraiwa; Izumi Hanada; Hakushi Kim; Masahiro Nitta; Masanori Hasegawa; Yoshiaki Kawamura; Kazunobu Hashida; Takuma Tajiri; Akira Miyajima
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Indications for and transitioning to secondary treatment while on active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Allison S Glass; Marc A Dall'Era
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-04

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided prostate biopsy: Current status of the cancer detection and the prospects of tailor-made medicine of the prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sunao Shoji
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-12-27

7.  Serial changes in tumour measurements and apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance with and without histopathological progression.

Authors:  Nikita Sushentsev; Iztok Caglic; Leonardo Rundo; Vasily Kozlov; Evis Sala; Vincent J Gnanapragasam; Tristan Barrett
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 3.039

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.