Literature DB >> 21832814

The value of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound in predicting the nature of prostate diseases and the Gleason score of prostate cancer by a subjective blood flow grading scale.

Hong Wei Zhao1, Jun Hang Luo, Hui Xiong Xu, Dao Hu Wang, Ying Rong Lai, Mian Ni Chen, Jian Yao Lv, Xiao Yan Xie, Ming De Lu, Wei Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the value of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (CETRUS) in predicting the nature of prostate diseases and prostate cancer Gleason score.
METHODS: 106 patients suspected of prostate cancer were evaluated with CETRUS followed by systematic biopsy. Prostate blood flow of CETRUS was graded using a subjective 5-point scale. The relationships between ultrasound findings and biopsy outcomes, as well as prostate cancer Gleason score were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CETRUS.
RESULTS: Biopsy revealed prostate cancer in 43 of 106 patients. The proportions of malignant histology in the groups with CETRUS scores of 1-5 were 0% (0/10), 8.3% (2/24), 31.7% (13/41), 88.9% (16/18) and 92.3% (12/13), respectively. The rate of prostate cancer with a Gleason score ≥7 in the groups with a CETRUS score of 2-5 were 0% (0/2), 15.4% (2/13), 37.5% (6/16) and 91.7% (11/12), respectively. The blood flow grading scale correlated with pathological outcomes and Gleason score significantly (r = 0.66, p < 0.001; and r = 0.61, p < 0.001, respectively). ROC analysis showed the area under the ROC curve to be 0.87.
CONCLUSIONS: CETRUS-based blood flow grading scale is a reliable tool for predicting the pathological outcome of prostate diseases and prostate cancer Gleason score noninvasively.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21832814     DOI: 10.1159/000327988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  6 in total

1.  Non-invasive quantification of tumor blood flow in prostate cancer using 15O-H2O PET/CT.

Authors:  Lars P Tolbod; Maria M Nielsen; Bodil G Pedersen; Søren Høyer; Hendrik J Harms; Michael Borre; Per Borghammer; Kirsten Bouchelouche; Jørgen Frøkiær; Jens Sørensen
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-20

Review 2.  Image guidance in the focal treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anthony N Hoang; Dmitry Volkin; Nitin K Yerram; Srinivas Vourganti; Jeffrey Nix; W Marston Linehan; Bradford Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound aids in the detection of prostate rhabdomyosarcoma: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  LE-Hang Guo; Hui-Xiong Xu; Hui-Jun Fu; Li-Ping Sun; Bo-Ji Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  Application of Multiple Ultrasonic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yushan Liu; Shi Zeng; Ran Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Image-based monitoring of targeted biopsy-proven prostate cancer on active surveillance: 11-year experience.

Authors:  Sunao Shoji; Osamu Ukimura; Andre Luis de Castro Abreu; Arnaud Marien; Toru Matsugasumi; Duke Bahn; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation of pancreatic cancer xenografts in nude mice after irradiation with sub-threshold focused ultrasound for tumor ablation.

Authors:  Yi Hui Gao; Lei Wu; Rui Wang; Qian Guo; Yi Ni Chen; Bing Hu; Li Xin Jiang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.