Literature DB >> 26093360

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Coiling Versus Microsurgical Clipping for Unruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Timothy R Smith1, David J Cote2, Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock2, Youssef J Hamade3, Samer G Zammar3, Najib E El Tecle3, H Hunt Batjer4, Bernard R Bendok3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Middle cerebral artery aneurysms (MCAAs) are regularly treated by both microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling. We performed a systematic meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of these 2 methods.
METHODS: Literature was reviewed for all studies reporting angiographic occlusion and/or functional outcomes in adults with unruptured MCAA treated by endovascular coiling or microsurgical clipping. All studies in English that reported results for adults (≥18 years) with unruptured MCAAs, from 1990 to 2011 were considered for inclusion.
RESULTS: Twenty-six studies involving 2295 aneurysms treated with clipping or coiling for unruptured MCAAs were included for analysis. There were 1530 aneurysms that were treated with clipping and 765 aneurysms treated with coiling. Pooled analysis revealed failure of aneurysmal occlusion in 3.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2%-7.4%) of clipped cases. Pooled analysis of 15 studies (606 aneurysms) involving coiling and occlusion revealed lack of occlusion rates of 47.7% (95% CI 43.6%-51.8%) with the fixed-effects model and 48.2% (95% CI 39.0%-57.4%) with the random-effects model. Thirteen studies examined neurological outcomes after clipping and were pooled for analysis. Both fixed-effect and random-effect models revealed unfavorable outcomes in 2.1% (95% CI 1.3%-3.3%) of patients. There were 17 studies evaluating potential unfavorable neurological outcomes after coiling that were pooled for analysis. Fixed-effect and random-effect models revealed unfavorable outcomes in 6.5% (95% CI 4.5%-9.3%) and 4.9% (95% CI 3.0%-8.1%) of patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis of unruptured MCAAs, after careful consideration of patient, aneurysmal, and treatment center factors, we recommend surgical clipping for unruptured MCAA.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysm; Clipping; Coiling; Endovascular; MCA aneurysm; Meta-analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26093360     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.05.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  25 in total

1.  Clinical and morphological risk factors for the recurrence of anterior communicating artery aneurysms after clipping or coiling.

Authors:  Jai Ho Choi; Yong Sam Shin; Hee Jong Ki; Kwan Sung Lee; Bum Soo Kim
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: A single center experience with a focus on thromboembolic complications.

Authors:  Thomas W Link; Srikanth R Boddu; Hoda T Hammad; Jared Knopman; Ning Lin; Pierre Gobin; Athos Patsalides
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Current Strategies in the Treatment of Intracranial Large and Giant Aneurysms.

Authors:  Matthias Gmeiner; Andreas Gruber
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2021

4.  Endovascular treatment of complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms using TuBridge flow diverters.

Authors:  Feng Liang; Yibing Yang; Lijuan Luo; Bingye Liao; Guofeng Zhang; Siqi Ou; Weiping Xiao; Ning Guo; Tiewei Qi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Intracranial aneurysms at higher clinical risk for rupture demonstrate increased wall enhancement and thinning on multicontrast 3D vessel wall MRI.

Authors:  Jason Brett Hartman; Hiroko Watase; Jie Sun; Daniel S Hippe; Louis Kim; Michael Levitt; Laligam Sekhar; Niranjan Balu; Thomas Hatsukami; Chun Yuan; Mahmud Mossa-Basha
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Clinical features of ischemic complications after unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm clipping: patients and radiologically related factors.

Authors:  Heui Seung Lee; Moinay Kim; Jung Cheol Park; Jae Sung Ahn; Seungjoo Lee; Wonhyoung Park
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Microsurgical clipping and endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms in an interdisciplinary treatment concept: Comparison of long-term results.

Authors:  Christoph Schwartz; Hans-Christoph Aster; Rahman Al-Schameri; Erasmia Müller-Thies-Broussalis; Christoph J Griessenauer; Monika Killer-Oberpfalzer
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 1.610

8.  The application of the unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: a retrospective, single-center study.

Authors:  Silvia Hernández-Durán; Dorothee Mielke; Veit Rohde; Vesna Malinova
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Felipe Gomes de Barros Pontes; Edina Mk da Silva; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Vladimir Vasconcelos
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-10

10.  Procedural complications in patients undergoing microsurgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience with 1923 aneurysms.

Authors:  Eric S Nussbaum; Jillienne C Touchette; Michael T Madison; James K Goddard; Jeffrey P Lassig; Mark E Meyers; Collin M Torok; Jason J Carroll; Jodi Lowary; Tariq Janjua; Leslie A Nussbaum
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.