Literature DB >> 26092326

Salzburg Consensus Criteria for Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus--approach to clinical application.

M Leitinger1, S Beniczky2, A Rohracher3, E Gardella4, G Kalss3, E Qerama5, J Höfler3, A Hess Lindberg-Larsen5, G Kuchukhidze3, J Dobesberger3, P B Langthaler3, E Trinka6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Salzburg Consensus Criteria for diagnosis of Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus (SCNC) were proposed at the 4th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on status epilepticus in Salzburg (2013).
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the EEGs of 50 consecutive nonhypoxic patients with diagnoses of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) at discharge and 50 consecutive controls with abnormal EEGs in a large university hospital in Austria. We implemented the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology, 2012 version (ACNS criteria) to increase the test performance of SCNC. In patients without preexisting epileptic encephalopathy, the following criteria were applied: (1) more than 25 epileptiform discharges (ED) per 10-second epoch, i.e., >2.5/s and (2) patients with EDs ≤ 2.5/s or rhythmic delta/theta activity (RDT) exceeding 0.5/s AND at least one of the additional criteria: (2a) clinical and EEG improvements from antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), (2b) subtle clinical phenomena, or (2c) typical spatiotemporal evolution. In case of fluctuation without evolution or EEG improvement without clinical improvement, "possible NCSE" was diagnosed. For identification of RDT, the following criteria were compared: (test condition A) continuous delta-theta activity without further rules, (B) ACNS criterion for rhythmic delta activity (RDA), and (C) ACNS criteria for RDA and fluctuation.
RESULTS: False positive rate in controls dropped from 28% (condition A) to 2% (B) (p = 0.00039) and finally to 0% (C) (p = 0.000042). Application of test condition C in the group with NCSE gives one false negative (2%). Various EEG patterns were found in patients with NCSE: (1) 8.2%, (2a) 2%, (2b) 12.2%, and (2c) 32.7%. Possible NCSE was diagnosed based on fluctuations in 57.1% and EEG improvement without clinical improvement in 14.2%.
CONCLUSION: The modified SCNC with refined definitions including the ACNS terminology leads to clinically relevant and statistically significant reduction of false positive diagnoses of NCSE and to minimal loss in sensitivity. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Status Epilepticus".
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic criteria; EEG; Nonconvulsive status epilepticus; Score; Status epilepticus

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26092326     DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Behav        ISSN: 1525-5050            Impact factor:   2.937


  79 in total

1.  Continuous Electroencephalography After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Hyunjo Lee; Moshe A Mizrahi; Jed A Hartings; Sameer Sharma; Laura Pahren; Laura B Ngwenya; Brian D Moseley; Michael Privitera; Frank C Tortella; Brandon Foreman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Defining and Validating the Salzburg Criteria: It's Complicated.

Authors:  Jong Woo Lee
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 7.500

Review 3.  Electroencephalographic Patterns in Neurocritical Care: Pathologic Contributors or Epiphenomena?

Authors:  Brian Appavu; James J Riviello
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Ketamine for Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anna Rosati; Salvatore De Masi; Renzo Guerrini
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Post-stroke seizures are clinically underestimated.

Authors:  Carla Bentes; Hugo Martins; Ana Rita Peralta; Carlos Casimiro; Carlos Morgado; Ana Catarina Franco; Ana Catarina Fonseca; Ruth Geraldes; Patrícia Canhão; Teresa Pinho E Melo; Teresa Paiva; José M Ferro
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Evaluation of STESS, mRSTESS, and EMSE to Predict High Disability and Mortality at Hospital Discharge in Ecuadorian Patients with Status Epilepticus.

Authors:  Dannys Rivero Rodríguez; Claudio Scherle Matamoros; Kimberly Sam; Daniela DiCapua Sacoto; Nelson Maldonado Samaniego; Yanelis Pernas
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Clinical and radiologic correlates of neurotoxicity after axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Paolo Strati; Loretta J Nastoupil; Jason Westin; Luis E Fayad; Sairah Ahmed; Nathan H Fowler; Fredrick B Hagemeister; Hun J Lee; Swaminathan P Iyer; Ranjit Nair; Simrit Parmar; Maria A Rodriguez; Felipe Samaniego; Raphael E Steiner; Michael Wang; Chelsea C Pinnix; Sherry Adkins; Catherine M Claussen; Charles S Martinez; Misha C Hawkins; Nicole A Johnson; Prachee Singh; Haleigh E Mistry; Sandra Horowitz; Shirley George; Lei Feng; Partow Kebriaei; Elizabeth J Shpall; Sattva S Neelapu; Sudhakar Tummala; T Linda Chi
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-08-25

Review 8.  Prognostic Value of EEG in Patients after Cardiac Arrest-An Updated Review.

Authors:  Wolfgang Muhlhofer; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 9.  Ictal Interictal Continuum Patterns.

Authors:  Gamaleldin M Osman; Davi F Araújo; Carolina B Maciel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 10.  Treatment of Refractory and Super-refractory Status Epilepticus.

Authors:  Samhitha Rai; Frank W Drislane
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.