Literature DB >> 26092215

Acute cholecystitis: risk factors for conversion to an open procedure.

Megan Sippey1, Marysia Grzybowski1, Mark L Manwaring1, Kevin R Kasten1, William H Chapman1, Walter E Pofahl1, Walter J Pories1, Konstantinos Spaniolas2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common general surgical procedures performed. Conversion to an open procedure (CTO) is associated with increased morbidity and length of stay. Patients presenting with acute cholecystitis are at higher risk for CTO. Studies have attempted to examine risk factors for CTO in patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis but are limited by small sample size. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative variables that predict higher risk for CTO in patients presenting with acute cholecystitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis from 2005-2011 were identified from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File. Patients who underwent successful laparoscopic surgery were compared with those who required CTO. Demographics, comorbidities, and 30-d outcomes were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used for variables with P value <0.1, with CTO used as the dependent variable.
RESULTS: A total of 7242 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. CTO was reported in 436 patients (6.0%). Those who required conversion were older (60.7 ± 16.2 versus 51.6 ± 18.0, P = 0.0001) and mean body mass index was greater (30.8 ± 7.6 versus 30.0 ± 7.3, P = 0.033) compared with those whose procedure was completed laparoscopically. Vascular, cardiac, renal, pulmonary, neurologic, hepatic disease, diabetes, and bleeding disorders were more prevalent in CTO patients. Mortality (2.3% versus 0.7%, P < 0.0001), overall morbidity (21.8% versus 6.0%, P < 0.0001), serious morbidity (14.9% versus 3.8%, P < 0.0001), reoperation (3.4% versus 1.4%, P = 0.001), and surgical site infection (9.2% versus 1.8%, P < 0.0001) rates, as well as length of stay (8.6 ± 13.0 versus 3.4 ± 6.7, P < 0.0001) were greater in those requiring CTO. The following factors were independently associated with CTO: age (odds ratio [OR], 1.01, P = 0.015), male gender (OR, 1.77, P = 0.005), body mass index (OR, 1.04, P < 0.0001), preoperative alkaline phosphatase (OR, 1.01, P = 0.0005), white blood cell count (OR, 1.06, P = 0.0001), and albumin (OR, 0.52, P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: CTO for acute cholecystitis remains low but not clinically negligible. The identified risk factors can potentially guide management and patient selection for delayed intervention for acute cholecystitis.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACS-NSQIP; Acute Cholecystitis; Conversion; Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26092215     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  13 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative predictors of conversion as indicators of local inflammation in acute cholecystitis: strategies for future studies to develop quantitative predictors.

Authors:  Roheena Z Panni; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 7.027

2.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP Analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Sam C Wang; Matthew R Porembka; Adam C Yopp; Michael A Choti; Mathew M Augustine; Patricio M Polanco; John C Mansour; Rebecca M Minter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Delayed Presentation of Acute Cholecystitis: Comparative Outcomes of Same-Admission Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jarrod K H Tan; Joel C I Goh; Janice W L Lim; Iyer G Shridhar; Krishnakumar Madhavan; Alfred W C Kow
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Risk factors and consequences of conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Bin Xu; Yu-Xiang Wang; Yong-Xin Qiu; Hong-Bo Meng; Jian Gong; Wei Sun; Bo Zhou; Jian He; Ti Zhang; Wen-Yan Zheng; Zhen-Shun Song
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Preoperative risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a validated risk score derived from a prospective U.K. database of 8820 patients.

Authors:  Robert P Sutcliffe; Marianne Hollyman; James Hodson; Glenn Bonney; Ravi S Vohra; Ewen A Griffiths
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Routine use of ICG to enhance operative safety in emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wong Hoi She; Tan To Cheung; Miu Yee Chan; Ka Wan Chu; Ka Wing Ma; Simon H Y Tsang; Wing Chiu Dai; Albert C Y Chan; Chung Mau Lo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Safe laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in the face of severe inflammation in the cystohepatic triangle: a retrospective review and proposed management strategy for the difficult gallbladder

Authors:  Roderick H. Purzner; Karen B. Ho; Eisar Al-Sukhni; Shiva Jayaraman
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Predicting Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy: A Single Institution Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Samer Al Masri; Yaser Shaib; Mostapha Edelbi; Hani Tamim; Faek Jamali; Nicholas Batley; Walid Faraj; Ali Hallal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  The critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Strasberg Yes or No? An Italian Multicentre study.

Authors:  Lucia Ilaria Sgaramella; Angela Gurrado; Alessandro Pasculli; Nicola de Angelis; Riccardo Memeo; Francesco Paolo Prete; Stefano Berti; Graziano Ceccarelli; Marco Rigamonti; Francesco Giuseppe Aldo Badessi; Nicola Solari; Marco Milone; Fausto Catena; Stefano Scabini; Francesco Vittore; Gennaro Perrone; Carlo de Werra; Ferdinando Cafiero; Mario Testini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Optimal timing of cholecystectomy after percutaneous gallbladder drainage for severe cholecystitis.

Authors:  Koetsu Inoue; Tatsuya Ueno; Orie Nishina; Daisuke Douchi; Kentaro Shima; Shinji Goto; Michinaga Takahashi; Chikashi Shibata; Hiroo Naito
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.