Judy Kruger1, Amal Jama2, David M Homa3, Stephen D Babb3, Brian A King3. 1. Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, United States. Electronic address: ezk0@cdc.gov. 2. D.B. Consulting Group, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, United States. 3. Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and characteristics of smoke-free home and vehicle rules by tobacco use. METHODS: Data came from the 2012-2013 National Adult Tobacco Survey, a telephone survey of adults aged ≥18. Respondents who reported smoking is 'never allowed' inside their home or any family vehicle were considered to have smoke-free home and vehicle rules, respectively. Prevalence and characteristics of smoke-free rules were assessed overall and by current tobacco use (combustible only, noncombustible only, combustible and noncombustible, no current tobacco use). Assessed characteristics included: sex, age, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, income, region, and sexual orientation. RESULTS: Nationally, 83.7% of adults (n=48,871) had smoke-free home rules and 78.1% (n=46,183) had smoke-free vehicle rules. By tobacco use, prevalence was highest among nonusers of tobacco (homes: 90.8%; vehicles: 88.9%) and lowest among combustible-only users (homes: 53.7%; vehicles: 34.2%). Prevalence of smoke-free home and vehicle rules was higher among males, adults with a graduate degree, and adults living in the West. CONCLUSIONS: Most adults have smoke-free home and vehicle rules, but differences exist by tobacco use. Opportunities exist to educate adults about the dangers of secondhand smoke and the benefits of smoke-free environments, particularly among combustible tobacco users. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and characteristics of smoke-free home and vehicle rules by tobacco use. METHODS: Data came from the 2012-2013 National Adult Tobacco Survey, a telephone survey of adults aged ≥18. Respondents who reported smoking is 'never allowed' inside their home or any family vehicle were considered to have smoke-free home and vehicle rules, respectively. Prevalence and characteristics of smoke-free rules were assessed overall and by current tobacco use (combustible only, noncombustible only, combustible and noncombustible, no current tobacco use). Assessed characteristics included: sex, age, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, income, region, and sexual orientation. RESULTS: Nationally, 83.7% of adults (n=48,871) had smoke-free home rules and 78.1% (n=46,183) had smoke-free vehicle rules. By tobacco use, prevalence was highest among nonusers of tobacco (homes: 90.8%; vehicles: 88.9%) and lowest among combustible-only users (homes: 53.7%; vehicles: 34.2%). Prevalence of smoke-free home and vehicle rules was higher among males, adults with a graduate degree, and adults living in the West. CONCLUSIONS: Most adults have smoke-free home and vehicle rules, but differences exist by tobacco use. Opportunities exist to educate adults about the dangers of secondhand smoke and the benefits of smoke-free environments, particularly among combustible tobacco users. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Nonsmoking homes; Public places; Smoke-free transactions; Vehicles
Authors: Andrew Hyland; Cheryl Higbee; Mark J Travers; Amy Van Deusen; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Brian King; K Michael Cummings Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-04-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Benjamin Healey; Janet Hoek; Nick Wilson; George Thomson; Steve Taylor; Richard Edwards Journal: Tob Control Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Israel T Agaku; Brian A King; Corinne G Husten; Rebecca Bunnell; Bridget K Ambrose; S Sean Hu; Enver Holder-Hayes; Hannah R Day Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Deborah J Ossip; Tye Johnson; Vanessa Assibey-Mensah; Sijiu Wang; Donald McLaren; Karen Calabro; Alexander V Prokhorov; Scott McIntosh Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2017-12-04
Authors: Michelle C Kegler; Katherine Anderson; Lucja T Bundy; Deana Knauf; June Halfacre; Cam Escoffery; Andre Cramblit; Patricia Henderson Journal: J Community Health Date: 2019-08
Authors: Tess Thompson; Ebuwa I Evbuoma-Fike; Rachel Garg; Amy McQueen; Charlene Caburnay; Matthew W Kreuter Journal: J Community Health Date: 2022-08-06
Authors: Karen M Wilson; Angela Moss; Michelle Lowary; Jacqueline Holstein; Jessica Gambino; Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga; Gwendolyn S Kerby; Jonathan D Klein; Melbourne Hovell; Jonathan P Winickoff Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2021-11-21 Impact factor: 2.993
Authors: Judy Kruger; Amal Jama; Michelle Kegler; Carissa Baker Holmes; Sean Hu; Brian King Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 3.390