Literature DB >> 26092017

Major perioperative complications in laparoscopic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: perspectives from a high-volume center.

Jun Lu1, Chang-ming Huang2, Chao-hui Zheng1, Ping Li1, Jian-wei Xie1, Jia-bin Wang1, Jian-xian Lin1, Qi-yue Chen1, Long-long Cao1, Mi Lin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy (LSPTG) for gastric cancer is only performed at a few specialized institutions and carries the risk of major perioperative complications (MPCs) that may require reoperation and impair recovery. However, the predictors of such events remain largely unknown.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 325 consecutive patients undergoing LSPTG at a single institution from June 2011 to February 2014 were analyzed to determine the preoperative factors that correlated with MPCs. The rates of MPCs were assessed, and a score model was developed to identify preoperative variables associated with MPC.
RESULTS: Of the 325 LSPTG cases, the following types of MPCs were observed in 15 (4.6%) patients: intraoperative splenic hilar vascular injury (n = 1); intraoperative splenic parenchymal injury (n = 5); intraoperative splenic infarction (n = 1); intraabdominal abscess that required radiological intervention [not under general anesthesia (n = 2)]; intra-abdominal bleeding that required reoperation under general anesthesia (n = 2); anastomotic hemorrhage that required reoperation under general anesthesia (n = 2); and death (n = 2). Three independent variables were correlated with MPCs in the multivariate analysis: body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m(2) (odds ratio [OR] 3.992, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.210-13.175), tumor located at the greater curvature (OR 3.922, 95% CI 1.194-12.880), and No.10 LN metastases (OR 4.418, 95 % CI 1.250-13.770). A risk score consisting of one point for each preoperative risk factor (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2) or tumor location in the greater curvature), resulting in an overall score of 0-2 points for each patient, predicted an increased risk of MPCs.
CONCLUSIONS: BMI, tumor location, and No.10 LN metastases were significantly associated with increased rates of MPCs. A simple, clinically relevant scoring system based on two preoperative variables was clinically useful in predicting MPC risk in patients undergoing LSPTG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Laparoscopic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy; Major complications; Scoring system

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26092017     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4291-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  39 in total

1.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 2.  Huang's three-step maneuver for laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chang-Ming Huang; Qi-Yue Chen; Jian-Xian Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Laparoscopic gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for upper gastric cancer.

Authors:  S Tanimura; M Higashino; Y Fukunaga; S Kishida; A Ogata; Y Fujiwara; H Osugi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  The epidemiology of gastric cancer.

Authors:  David M Roder
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Laparoscopic pancreas- and spleen-preserving D2 lymph node dissection in advanced (cT2) upper-third gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hoon Hur; Hae Myung Jeon; Wook Kim
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study.

Authors:  Hyung-Ho Kim; Sang-Uk Han; Min-Chan Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Wook Kim; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Seung Wan Ryu; Gyu Seok Cho; Kyo Young Song; Seong Yeob Ryu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Predictive factors for surgical complications of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chikara Kunisaki; Hirochika Makino; Ryo Takagawa; Kei Sato; Mayumi Kawamata; Amane Kanazawa; Naoto Yamamoto; Yasuhiko Nagano; Shoichi Fujii; Hidetaka A Ono; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Splenectomy for treatment of gastric cancer: Japanese experience.

Authors:  K Okajima; H Isozaki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer in left approach: a new operation procedure.

Authors:  Wang Jia-Bin; Huang Chang-Ming; Zheng Chao-Hui; Li Ping; Xie Jian-Wei; Lin Jian-Xian
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Total gastrectomy with simultaneous pancreaticosplenectomy or splenectomy in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  E Otsuji; T Yamaguchi; K Sawai; K Okamoto; T Takahashi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hisahiro Hosogi; Hiroshi Okabe; Hisashi Shinohara; Shigeru Tsunoda; Shigeo Hisamori; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-08

2.  Clinical Relevance of Splenic Hilar Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matching Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Jian-Xian Lin; Zu-Kai Wang; Ying-Qi Huang; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Ju-Li Lin; Hua-Long Zheng; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang; Ping Li
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy shows better short-term advantages: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Zu-Kai Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Fu-Hai Wang; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Ju-Li Lin; Hua-Long Zheng; Ping Li; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Conventional regression analysis and machine learning in prediction of anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications after esophagogastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Robert T van Kooten; Renu R Bahadoer; Bouwdewijn Ter Buurkes de Vries; Michel W J M Wouters; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Henk H Hartgrink; Hein Putter; Johan L Dikken
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.885

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.