Literature DB >> 24470012

Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study.

Hyung-Ho Kim1, Sang-Uk Han, Min-Chan Kim, Woo Jin Hyung, Wook Kim, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Seung Wan Ryu, Gyu Seok Cho, Kyo Young Song, Seong Yeob Ryu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer have not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to validate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in terms of long-term survival, morbidity, and mortality retrospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 2,976 patients who were treated with curative intent either by laparoscopic gastrectomy (1,477 patients) or open gastrectomy (1,499 patients) between April 1998 and December 2005. The long-term 5-year actual survival analysis in case-control and case-matched population was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. The morbidity and mortality and learning curves were evaluated.
RESULTS: In the case-control study, the overall survival, disease-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival (median follow-up period, 70.8 months) were not statistically different at each cancer stage with the exception of an increased overall survival rate for patients with stage IA cancer treated via laparoscopy (laparoscopic group; 95.3%, open group: 90.3%; P < .001). After matching using a propensity scoring system, the overall survival, disease-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival rates were not statistically different at each stage. The morbidity of the case-matched group was 15.1% in the open group and 12.5% in the laparoscopic group, which also had no statistical significance (P = .184). The mortality rate was also not statistically significant (0.3% in the open group and 0.5% in the laparoscopic group; P = 1.000). The mean learning curve was 42.
CONCLUSION: The long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer were comparable to those of open gastrectomy in a large-scale, multicenter, retrospective clinical study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24470012     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  138 in total

1.  A phase II study of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Norihiko Sugisawa; Masanori Tokunaga; Rie Makuuchi; Yuichiro Miki; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Eleven-year experience with 3000 cases of laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery in a single institution: analysis of postoperative morbidities and long-term oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Young Suk Park; Sang-Yong Son; Aung Myint Oo; Do Hyun Jung; Dong Joon Shin; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of single-port and reduced-port totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for patients with early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Su Mi Kim; Man Ho Ha; Jeong Eun Seo; Ji Eun Kim; Min Gew Choi; Tae Sung Sohn; Jae Moon Bae; Sung Kim; Jun Ho Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Early experience of duet laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (duet-LDG) using three abdominal ports for gastric carcinoma: surgical technique and comparison with conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Oh Jeong; Young Kyu Park; Seong Yeob Ryu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Predictive value of drain amylase content for peripancreatic inflammatory fluid collections after laparoscopic (assisted) distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Mitsuro Kanda; Michitaka Fujiwara; Chie Tanaka; Daisuke Kobayashi; Naoki Iwata; Akira Mizuno; Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Goro Nakayama; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masahiko Koike; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jiang Yu; Changming Huang; Yihong Sun; Xiangqian Su; Hui Cao; Jiankun Hu; Kuan Wang; Jian Suo; Kaixiong Tao; Xianli He; Hongbo Wei; Mingang Ying; Weiguo Hu; Xiaohui Du; Yanfeng Hu; Hao Liu; Chaohui Zheng; Ping Li; Jianwei Xie; Fenglin Liu; Ziyu Li; Gang Zhao; Kun Yang; Chunxiao Liu; Haojie Li; Pingyan Chen; Jiafu Ji; Guoxin Li
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Comparison of the long-term results of patients who underwent laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jun Ho Lee; Byung-Ho Nam; Keun Won Ryu; Seong Yeop Ryu; Young Woo Kim; Young Kyu Park; Sung Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Early unplanned reoperations after gastrectomy for gastric cancer are different between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery.

Authors:  Ping Li; Jian-Xian Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Jun Lu; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ze-Ning Huang; Ju-Li Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Role of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy compared to laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in suprapancreatic nodal dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Young-Woo Kim; Daniel Reim; Ji Yeon Park; Bang Wool Eom; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Keun Won Ryu; Hong Man Yoon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Application of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ziyu Li; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.