Literature DB >> 26091852

Motion responses in scene-selective regions.

Didem Korkmaz Hacialihafiz1, Andreas Bartels2.   

Abstract

The vast majority of studies on scene processing were conducted using stationary scenes. However, during natural vision, scene views change dynamically due to self-induced eye-, head-, and body-motion, and these dynamic changes are crucial for other higher-level functions such as navigation, self-motion perception, and spatial updating. Yet, we do not know whether or how scene selective regions are modulated by visual motion and to which degree their motion response depends on scene content. In this study, we used fMRI to examine both questions using a 2×2 factorial design with the factors 2D planar motion (motion versus static) and scene content (natural scenes versus their Fourier scrambles). We found that among independently localized scene-responsive regions, parahippocampal place area (PPA) and transverse occipital sulcus (TOS), also referred to as occipital place area (OPA), were significantly motion responsive, whereas retrosplenial cortex (RSC) was not. Additionally, PPA showed an interaction between motion and scene in that it responded more to motion in context of scenes than scramble, with similar trends in TOS and RSC. These results provide a novel functional dissociation between motion-responsive PPA and TOS/OPA versus motion-unresponsive RSC and suggest a strong role for PPA in integrating motion and scene content.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motion; OPA; PPA; Retrosplenial cortex; Scenes; TOS; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26091852     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  6 in total

1.  Egomotion-related visual areas respond to active leg movements.

Authors:  Chiara Serra; Claudio Galletti; Sara Di Marco; Patrizia Fattori; Gaspare Galati; Valentina Sulpizio; Sabrina Pitzalis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The occipital place area represents first-person perspective motion information through scenes.

Authors:  Frederik S Kamps; Vishal Lall; Daniel D Dilks
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Two scene navigation systems dissociated by deliberate versus automatic processing.

Authors:  Shosuke Suzuki; Frederik S Kamps; Daniel D Dilks; Michael T Treadway
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.644

4.  A common neural substrate for processing scenes and egomotion-compatible visual motion.

Authors:  Valentina Sulpizio; Gaspare Galati; Patrizia Fattori; Claudio Galletti; Sabrina Pitzalis
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.270

5.  Evidencing a place for the hippocampus within the core scene processing network.

Authors:  C J Hodgetts; J P Shine; A D Lawrence; P E Downing; K S Graham
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Neural bases of self- and object-motion in a naturalistic vision.

Authors:  Sabrina Pitzalis; Chiara Serra; Valentina Sulpizio; Giorgia Committeri; Francesco de Pasquale; Patrizia Fattori; Claudio Galletti; Rosamaria Sepe; Gaspare Galati
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.038

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.