| Literature DB >> 26090419 |
Edyta Maslak1, Elzbieta Buczek2, Antoni Szumny3, Wojciech Szczepnski4, Magdalena Franczyk-Zarow5, Aneta Kopec5, Stefan Chlopicki6, Teresa Leszczynska5, Renata B Kostogrys5.
Abstract
This study assessed the effects of individual conjugated linoleic acid isomers, c9t11-CLA and t10c12-CLA, on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and systemic endothelial dysfunction in rats fed for four weeks with control or high-fructose diet. The high-fructose diet hampered body weight gain (without influencing food intake), increased liver weight and glycogen storage in hepatocytes, upregulated expression of fatty acid synthase (FAS) and stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 (SCD-1), and increased saturated fatty acid (SFA) content in the liver. Both CLA isomers prevented excessive accumulation of glycogen in the liver. Specifically, t10c12-CLA decreased concentration of serum triacylglycerols and LDL + VLDL cholesterol, increased HDL cholesterol, and affected liver lipid content and fatty acid composition by downregulation of liver SCD-1 and FAS expression. In turn, the c9t11-CLA decreased LDL+VLDL cholesterol in the control group and downregulated liver expression of FAS without significant effects on liver weight, lipid content, and fatty acid composition. In summary, feeding rats with a high-fructose diet resulted in increased liver glycogen storage, indicating the induction of gluconeogenesis despite simultaneous upregulation of genes involved in de novo lipogenesis. Although both CLA isomers (c9t11 and t10c12) display hepatoprotective activity, the hypolipemic action of the t10c12-CLA isomer proved to be more pronounced than that of c9t11-CLA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26090419 PMCID: PMC4450214 DOI: 10.1155/2015/535982
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Composition of the experimental diets.
| Ingredients* [g/kg] | C | C + c9t11 | C + t10c12 | F | F + c9t11 | F + t10c12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fructose | — | — | — |
|
|
|
| Corn starch | 532.486 | 532.486 | 532.486 | — | — | — |
| Casein | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Sucrose | 100 | 100 | 100 | — | — | — |
| Soybean oil | 70 |
|
| 70 |
|
|
| Cellulose | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Mineral mix | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 |
| Vitamin mix | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Choline bitartrate | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| t-Butylhydroquinone | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 |
|
|
|
| — | — |
| — |
|
|
| — |
| — | — |
|
*The experimental diets ingredients were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, with the exception of the following: fructose obtained from Biofan, Poland; corn starch obtained from Agrotrade, Poland; and Casein obtained from Kazeina Polska Sp. z o.o., Poland.
Figure 1Body weight gain (a) and food intake (b) of rats fed with experimental diets. Values are means ± SEM (n = 6). Values with different superscript letters were significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).
Lipid profile, UA, glucose concentration, and enzyme activities (AST, ALT) in rats fed with experimental diets*.
| C | C + c9t11 | C + t10c12 | F | F + c9t11 | F + t10c12 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TG [mmol/L] | 2.98 ± 0.42abc | 2.28 ± 0.06a | 2.08 ± 0.23a | 3.86 ± 0.43bc | 4.29 ± 0.64c | 2.75 ± 0.35ab |
| TCH [mmol/L] | 2.09 ± 0.24ns | 1.78 ± 0.29ns | 1.98 ± 0.15ns | 1.84 ± 0.06ns | 1.85 ± 0.21ns | 1.98 ± 0.06ns |
| LDL + VLDL [mmol/L] | 0.95 ± 0.16c | 0.49 ± 0.12ab | 0.49 ± 0.09ab | 0.86 ± 0.08bc | 0.64 ± 0.22abc | 0.36 ± 0.14a |
| HDL [mmol/L] | 1.14 ± 0.19ab | 1.29 ± 0.26ab | 1.48 ± 0.11ab | 0.98 ± 0.09a | 1.21 ± 0.16abc | 1.62 ± 0.14b |
| UA [mg/dL] | 3.41 ± 0.82ns | 3.56 ± 0.99ns | 3.48 ± 1.01ns | 3.33 ± 0.35ns | 3.46 ± 0.92ns | 3.57 ± 0.75ns |
| Glucose [mg/dL] | 103.00 ± 2.4ns | 106.25 ± 4.2ns | 104.33 ± 3.2ns | 103.00 ± 5.2ns | 110.25 ± 3.6ns | 100.80 ± 2.3ns |
| ALT [U/I] | 23.22 ± 4.73ab | 29.40 ± 8.74b | 24.86 ± 2.28ab | 13.93 ± 0.75a | 12.16 ± 3.14a | 25.51 ± 2.71ab |
| AST [U/I] | 49.76 ± 2.62ab | 44.81 ± 5.26ab | 61.71 ± 8.95b | 33.44 ± 4.88a | 32.45 ± 7.63a | 44.05 ± 4.45ab |
*Values are means ± SEM (n = 6). Values in the same row with different superscript letters were significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2Liver weight (a) and total liver lipids content (b) in rats fed with experimental diets. Values are means ± SEM (n = 6). Values with different superscript letters were significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).
Liver fatty acid composition of Wistar rats after four weeks of experimental diets.
| Fatty acid [%] | C | C + c9t11 | C + t10c12 | F | F + c9t11 | F + t10c12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C14:0 | 0.68 ± 0.13a | 1.35 ± 0.26ab | 1.44 ± 0.23b | 1.29 ± 0.14ab | 1.14 ± 0.31ab | 0.88 ± 0.17ab |
| C16:0 | 16.85 ± 0.67a | 24.95 ± 1.14b | 28.12 ± 2.12b | 23.16 ± 1.32b | 25.52 ± 2.92b | 26.03 ± 0.43b |
| C16:1 | 2.70 ± 0.54a | 5.13 ± 0.47ab | 2.77 ± 0.46a | 6.61 ± 0.72b | 5.91 ± 1.72b | 2.84 ± 0.11a |
| C18:0 | 7.69 ± 0.65ab | 6.30 ± 0.81a | 14.89 ± 1.00d | 8.79 ± 1.13ab | 10.41 ± 0.70bc | 13.34 ± 1.72cd |
| C18:1 | 21.41 ± 0.53a | 19.06 ± 1.19a | 9.15 ± 2.92b | 25.22 ± 1.82a | 19.87 ± 3.88a | 17.37 ± 1.88a |
| C18:2 | 34.57 ± 2.08d | 26.90 ± 2.11c | 25.24 ± 1.19bc | 18.76 ± 0.30a | 20.83 ± 1.48ab | 20.77 ± 1.21ab |
| C18:3 | 5.72 ± 1.15a | 2.21 ± 0.29b | 1.70 ± 0.16b | 0.99 ± 0.11b | 1.24 ± 0.10b | 1.12 ± 0.07b |
| c9t11-CLA | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 2.46 ± 0.44c | 0.57 ± 0.22a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 1.42 ± 0.36b | 0.23 ± 0.06a |
| t10c12-CLA | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 1.38 ± 0.71b | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.08 ± 0.03a | 1.07 ± 0.40ab |
| C20:4 | 7.22 ± 1.53a | 9.25 ± 0.80ab | 11.50 ± 1.10bc | 9.07 ± 0.86ab | 10.49 ± 0.82abc | 13.16 ± 1.48c |
| C22:4 | 0.99 ± 0.66a | 0.17 ± 0.03a | 0.42 ± 0.06a | 1.13 ± 0.58a | 0.47 ± 0.11a | 0.30 ± 0.01a |
| C22:6 | 2.18 ± 0.43a | 2.15 ± 0.12a | 2.82 ± 0.47a | 4.99 ± 2.80a | 2.61 ± 0.24a | 2.89 ± 0.47a |
|
| ||||||
| 16:1/16:0 | 0.16 ± 0.03ab | 0.20 ± 0.01b | 0.10 ± 0.01a | 0.28 ± 0.02c | 0.22 ± 0.04bc | 0.11 ± 0.00a |
| 18:1/18:0 | 2.85 ± 0.26a | 3.28 ± 0.66a | 0.60 ± 0.18b | 3.03 ± 0.46a | 1.97 ± 0.45ac | 1.38 ± 0.27bc |
|
| ||||||
| SFA [%] | 25.22 ± 1.19d | 32.61 ± 0.85a | 44.46 ± 1.79c | 33.24 ± 2.17a | 37.07 ± 3.55ab | 40.25 ± 2.13bc |
| MUFA [%] | 24.11 ± 0.82a | 24.19 ± 1.58a | 11.92 ± 2.48c | 31.82 ± 2.32b | 25.79 ± 2.28ab | 20.21 ± 1.84a |
| PUFA [%] | 50.68 ± 1.93c | 43.16 ± 1.89a | 43.63 ± 0.88a | 34.94 ± 3.13b | 37.14 ± 1.34ab | 39.54 ± 1.87ab |
*Values are means ± SEM (n = 6). Values in the same row with different superscript letters were significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3Histopathological images of rat liver samples after four weeks of experimental diets. (a) HE staining. (b) PAS staining. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 4mRNA gene expression of FAS (a) and SCD-1 (b) in rats liver after four weeks of experimental diets. Values are means ± SEM (n = 6). Values with different superscript letters were significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).
Figure 5NO-dependent vasodilatation in aortas induced by acetylcholine in rats after four weeks of experimental diets. Values are means (n = 6). Values with different superscript letters were significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).