Literature DB >> 26090164

Crystal structure of hexa-aqua-dichlorido-ytterbium(III) chloride.

Kevin M Knopf1, Guy Crundwell1, Barry L Westcott1.   

Abstract

The crystal structure of the title compound, [YbCl2(H2O)6]Cl, was determined at 110 K. Samples were obtained from evaporated aceto-nitrile solutions containing the title compound, which consists of a [YbCl2(H2O)6](+) cation and a Cl(-) anion. The cations in the title compound sit on a twofold axis and form O-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds with the nearby Cl(-) anion. The coordination geometry around the metal centre forms a distorted square anti-prism. The ytterbium complex is isotypic with the europium complex [Tambrornino et al. (2014 ▶). Acta Cryst. E70, i27].

Entities:  

Keywords:  chloride; crystal structure; hydrogen bonding; ytterbium(III)

Year:  2015        PMID: 26090164      PMCID: PMC4459311          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015008488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Related literature

The ytterbium complex is isotypic with the europium complex, the redetermined structure of which was published recently (Tambrornino et al. 2014 ▸) which was in turn similar to studies of other lanthanoid chloride hydrates (Marezio et al., 1961 ▸).

Experimental

Crystal data

[YbCl2(H2O)6]Cl M = 387.49 Monoclinic, a = 7.8158 (11) Å b = 6.4651 (3) Å c = 12.7250 (18) Å β = 131.45 (2)° V = 481.92 (16) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 10.52 mm−1 T = 110 K 0.24 × 0.18 × 0.17 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Sapphire3 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▸) T min = 0.187, T max = 0.268 12358 measured reflections 1806 independent reflections 1762 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.042

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.018 wR(F 2) = 0.041 S = 1.12 1806 reflections 51 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.91 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.96 e Å−3

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▸); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▸); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS2014 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸) and ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▸); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL2014. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015008488/br2249sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015008488/br2249Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015008488/br2249fig1.tif A view of the title compound (Farrugia, 2012). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms have been omitted for clarity. CCDC reference: 1062504 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[YbCl2(H2O)6]ClDx = 2.671 Mg m3
Mr = 387.49Melting point: 350 K
Monoclinic, P2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.8158 (11) ÅCell parameters from 7486 reflections
b = 6.4651 (3) Åθ = 4.9–33.8°
c = 12.7250 (18) ŵ = 10.52 mm1
β = 131.45 (2)°T = 110 K
V = 481.92 (16) Å3Block, light pink
Z = 20.24 × 0.18 × 0.17 mm
F(000) = 362
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Sapphire3 diffractometer1806 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1762 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.042
Detector resolution: 16.1790 pixels mm-1θmax = 33.7°, θmin = 4.3°
ω scansh = −11→12
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)k = −9→9
Tmin = 0.187, Tmax = 0.268l = −19→19
12358 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.018w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0207P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.041(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.12Δρmax = 0.91 e Å3
1806 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.96 e Å3
51 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.0602 (13)
Experimental. Sample was covered in mineral oil prior to mounting in cryo stream.Hydrogen atoms were included and were allowed to refine to ideal O—H distances based upon geometric considerations. Thermal parameters for all H atoms were included in the refinement in riding motion approximation with Uiso = 1.5Ueq of the carrier atom.CrysAlisPro, Oxford Diffraction Ltd., Version 1.171.33.52 (release 06-11-2009 CrysAlis171 .NET) Empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics, implemented in SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm (Oxford Diffraction (2009).
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Yb10.50000.65776 (2)0.75000.01599 (6)
Cl10.32165 (12)0.34336 (8)0.56141 (7)0.02594 (12)
Cl20.0000−0.12652 (14)0.25000.02883 (16)
O10.1817 (3)0.5542 (3)0.71889 (19)0.0266 (3)
H1A0.16260.42790.74160.040*
H1B0.05690.63360.68230.040*
O20.7626 (3)0.9242 (3)0.85341 (19)0.0276 (3)
H2A0.77911.01810.90870.041*
H2B0.86110.94670.84340.041*
O30.5420 (3)0.8002 (3)0.93497 (19)0.0273 (3)
H3A0.67090.84551.01450.041*
H3B0.43150.81700.93610.041*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Yb10.01594 (8)0.01718 (8)0.01703 (8)0.0000.01184 (6)0.000
Cl10.0283 (3)0.0258 (3)0.0251 (3)−0.00427 (18)0.0183 (2)−0.00488 (18)
Cl20.0271 (4)0.0336 (4)0.0299 (4)0.0000.0206 (4)0.000
O10.0229 (8)0.0278 (8)0.0343 (9)−0.0001 (6)0.0212 (8)0.0043 (7)
O20.0293 (9)0.0262 (8)0.0359 (9)−0.0096 (7)0.0253 (8)−0.0098 (7)
O30.0310 (9)0.0331 (8)0.0246 (8)−0.0050 (7)0.0213 (8)−0.0061 (7)
Yb1—O2i2.3101 (17)Yb1—O1i2.3433 (16)
Yb1—O22.3101 (17)Yb1—O12.3434 (17)
Yb1—O3i2.3392 (17)Yb1—Cl1i2.7211 (7)
Yb1—O32.3392 (17)Yb1—Cl12.7212 (7)
O2i—Yb1—O283.56 (10)O1i—Yb1—Cl1i76.75 (5)
O2i—Yb1—O3i69.72 (6)O1—Yb1—Cl1i78.60 (5)
O2—Yb1—O3i76.09 (7)O2i—Yb1—Cl1108.14 (6)
O2i—Yb1—O376.09 (7)O2—Yb1—Cl1143.38 (5)
O2—Yb1—O369.72 (6)O3i—Yb1—Cl175.99 (5)
O3i—Yb1—O3133.64 (9)O3—Yb1—Cl1146.11 (5)
O2i—Yb1—O1i138.85 (6)O1i—Yb1—Cl178.60 (5)
O2—Yb1—O1i70.92 (6)O1—Yb1—Cl176.75 (5)
O3i—Yb1—O1i73.06 (7)Cl1i—Yb1—Cl183.34 (3)
O3—Yb1—O1i121.09 (7)Yb1—O1—H1A125.5
O2i—Yb1—O170.92 (6)Yb1—O1—H1B125.7
O2—Yb1—O1138.85 (6)H1A—O1—H1B108.8
O3i—Yb1—O1121.09 (7)Yb1—O2—H2A125.4
O3—Yb1—O173.06 (7)Yb1—O2—H2B125.4
O1i—Yb1—O1146.79 (9)H2A—O2—H2B109.2
O2i—Yb1—Cl1i143.38 (5)Yb1—O3—H3A125.4
O2—Yb1—Cl1i108.15 (6)Yb1—O3—H3B125.4
O3i—Yb1—Cl1i146.11 (5)H3A—O3—H3B109.2
O3—Yb1—Cl1i75.99 (5)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1A···Cl2ii0.912.373.2499 (19)163
O1—H1B···Cl1iii0.912.503.171 (2)131
O2—H2A···Cl1iv0.872.363.1460 (18)150
O2—H2B···Cl2v0.872.383.1806 (18)154
O3—H3A···Cl2vi0.882.333.179 (2)163
O3—H3B···Cl1vii0.882.483.1758 (19)136
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

DHA DHHA D A DHA
O1H1ACl2i 0.912.373.2499(19)163
O1H1BCl1ii 0.912.503.171(2)131
O2H2ACl1iii 0.872.363.1460(18)150
O2H2BCl2iv 0.872.383.1806(18)154
O3H3ACl2v 0.882.333.179(2)163
O3H3BCl1vi 0.882.483.1758(19)136

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) .

  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20

4.  Redetermination of [EuCl2(H2O)6]Cl.

Authors:  Frank Tambornino; Philipp Bielec; Constantin Hoch
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-05-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.