Literature DB >> 24940187

Redetermination of [EuCl2(H2O)6]Cl.

Frank Tambornino1, Philipp Bielec1, Constantin Hoch1.   

Abstract

The crystal structure of the title compound, hexa-aqua-dichlorido-europium(III) chloride, was redetermined with modern crystallographic methods. In comparison with the previous study [Lepert et al. (1983 ▶). Aust. J. Chem. 36, 477-482], it could be shown that the atomic coordinates of some O atoms had been confused and now were corrected. Moreover, it was possible to freely refine the positions of the H atoms and thus to improve the accurracy of the crystal structure. [EuCl2(H2O)6]Cl crystallizes with the GdCl3·6H2O structure-type, exhibiting discrete [EuCl2(H2O)6](+) cations as the main building blocks. The main blocks are linked with isolated chloride anions via O-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds into a three-dimensional framework. The Eu(3+) cation is located on a twofold rotation axis and is coordinated in the form of a Cl2O6 square anti-prism. One chloride anion coordinates directly to Eu(3+), whereas the other chloride anion, situated on a twofold rotation axis, is hydrogen bonded to six octa-hedrally arranged water mol-ecules.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24940187      PMCID: PMC4051107          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814010307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For previous structure determinations of the title compound, see: Lepert et al. (1983 ▶); Bel’skii & Struchkov (1965 ▶). For the GdCl3·6H2O structure type and isotypic compounds, see: Marezio et al. (1961 ▶); Bell & Smith (1990 ▶); Burns & Peterson (1971 ▶); Graeber et al. (1966 ▶); Habenschuss & Spedding (1980 ▶); Hoch & Simon (2008 ▶); Junk et al. (1999 ▶); Reuter et al. (1994 ▶). For related structures, see: Demyanets et al. (1974 ▶); Reuter et al. (1994 ▶). For standardization of crystal data, see: Gelato & Parthé (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[EuCl2(H2O)6]Cl M = 366.41 Monoclinic, a = 9.6438 (12) Å b = 6.5322 (10) Å c = 7.929 (3) Å β = 93.653 (13)° V = 498.4 (2) Å3 Z = 2 Ag Kα radiation λ = 0.56083 Å μ = 3.74 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.23 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

Stoe IPDS I diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (MulScanAbs in PLATON; Spek, 2009 ▶) T min = 0.425, T max = 0.510 13401 measured reflections 1762 independent reflections 1653 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.043

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.015 wR(F 2) = 0.032 S = 1.03 1762 reflections 66 parameters All H-atom parameters refined Δρmax = 0.63 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.77 e Å−3 Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2006 ▶); cell refinement: X-AREA; data reduction: X-AREA; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Crystal Impact, 2007 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814010307/wm5012sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814010307/wm5012Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1001456 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[EuCl2(H2O)6]ClZ = 2
Mr = 366.41F(000) = 348
Monoclinic, P2/nDx = 2.441 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 2yacAg Kα radiation, λ = 0.56083 Å
a = 9.6438 (12) ÅCell parameters from 13548 reflections
b = 6.5322 (10) ŵ = 3.74 mm1
c = 7.929 (3) ÅT = 293 K
β = 93.653 (13)°Stretched cuboid, clear colourless
V = 498.4 (2) Å30.23 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm
Stoe IPDS I diffractometer1762 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1653 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.043
φ scanθmax = 25.5°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (MulScanAbs in PLATON; Spek, 2009)h = −14→14
Tmin = 0.425, Tmax = 0.510k = −10→10
13401 measured reflectionsl = −11→11
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.015Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.032All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.03w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.015P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1762 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
66 parametersΔρmax = 0.63 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.77 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Eu10.75000.150918 (18)0.25000.01345 (3)
Cl10.44156 (5)0.16532 (7)0.76010 (6)0.02588 (9)
Cl20.75000.62387 (11)0.75000.02813 (13)
O10.85427 (18)0.4256 (2)0.0872 (2)0.0275 (3)
O20.78164 (18)0.0484 (2)0.9561 (2)0.0263 (3)
O30.56055 (17)0.3002 (2)0.1060 (2)0.0278 (3)
H10.827 (4)0.454 (6)0.001 (5)0.051 (4)*
H20.846 (3)0.084 (5)0.902 (4)0.035 (3)*
H30.766 (4)−0.063 (7)0.933 (5)0.058 (5)*
H40.551 (4)0.265 (6)0.020 (5)0.052 (5)*
H50.881 (4)0.520 (5)0.129 (5)0.040 (3)*
H60.491 (4)0.319 (6)0.152 (5)0.044 (4)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Eu10.01398 (5)0.01346 (5)0.01244 (6)0.000−0.00293 (3)0.000
Cl10.02417 (18)0.02396 (18)0.0286 (2)−0.00652 (16)−0.00541 (16)0.00198 (17)
Cl20.0297 (3)0.0305 (3)0.0235 (3)0.000−0.0033 (2)0.000
O10.0368 (8)0.0229 (6)0.0214 (8)−0.0100 (6)−0.0085 (6)0.0038 (5)
O20.0336 (7)0.0277 (7)0.0175 (7)−0.0047 (6)−0.0001 (6)−0.0039 (5)
O30.0250 (6)0.0317 (7)0.0250 (8)0.0067 (5)−0.0113 (6)−0.0028 (5)
Eu1—O12.4618 (15)O2—H30.76 (4)
Eu1—O1i2.4618 (16)O2—H20.81 (3)
Eu1—O2ii2.4620 (18)O3—H40.72 (4)
Eu1—O2iii2.4620 (18)O3—H60.79 (4)
Eu1—O32.3078 (16)Cl1—H22.535 (4)
Eu1—O3i2.3078 (15)Cl1—H42.3535 (4)
Eu1—Cl1iv2.7690 (12)Cl1—H5vi2.36 (3)
Eu1—Cl1v2.7690 (12)Cl2—H1i2.36 (4)
O1—H10.74 (4)Cl2—H3vii2.5071 (4)
O1—H50.74 (4)Cl2—H6viii2.53 (4)
Eu1—O1—H1122 (3)O1—Eu1—O2ii67.83 (6)
Eu1—O1—H1122 (3)O1i—Eu1—Cl1iv105.35 (5)
Eu1—O1—H5121 (3)O1—Eu1—Cl1iv145.35 (4)
Eu1—O1—H5121 (3)O2ii—Eu1—O2iii148.45 (8)
Eu1ix—O2—H2124 (3)O2ii—Eu1—Cl1iv83.83 (4)
Eu1ix—O2—H2124 (3)O2iii—Eu1—Cl1iv72.65 (4)
Eu1ix—O2—H3117 (3)O3i—Eu1—O1i76.70 (6)
Eu1ix—O2—H3117 (3)O3—Eu1—O1i67.31 (6)
Eu1—O3—H4112 (3)O3i—Eu1—O2ii116.15 (7)
Eu1—O3—H4112 (3)O3—Eu1—O2ii77.82 (6)
Eu1—O3—H6120 (3)O3i—Eu1—O3130.01 (8)
Eu1—O3—H6120 (3)O3i—Eu1—Cl1iv146.64 (4)
O1i—Eu1—O186.43 (9)O3—Eu1—Cl1iv78.18 (5)
O1i—Eu1—O2ii140.68 (5)Cl1iv—Eu1—Cl1v83.51 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···Cl2ii0.74 (4)2.36 (4)3.081 (2)166.08
O2—H2···Cl1iii0.81 (3)2.54 (3)3.351 (2)174.97
O2—H3···Cl2x0.76 (4)2.51 (4)3.2234 (19)157.37
O3—H4···Cl1ii0.72 (4)2.35 (4)3.036 (2)160.44
O1—H5vi···Cl10.74 (2)2.36 (3)3.095 (2)173.89
O3—H6···Cl2viii0.79 (4)2.53 (4)3.310 (2)170.66
Table 1

Selected bond lengths (Å)

Eu1—O12.4618 (15)
Eu1—O2i 2.4620 (18)
Eu1—O32.3078 (16)
Eu1—Cl1ii 2.7690 (12)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯Cl2i 0.74 (4)2.36 (4)3.081 (2)166.08
O2—H2⋯Cl1iii 0.81 (3)2.54 (3)3.351 (2)174.97
O2—H3⋯Cl2iv 0.76 (4)2.51 (4)3.2234 (19)157.37
O3—H4⋯Cl1i 0.72 (4)2.35 (4)3.036 (2)160.44
O1—H5v⋯Cl10.74 (2)2.36 (3)3.095 (2)173.89
O3—H6⋯Cl2vi 0.79 (4)2.53 (4)3.310 (2)170.66

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Hexaaqua-dibromidoeuropium(III) bromide, [EuBr(2)(H(2)O)(6)]Br.

Authors:  Constantin Hoch; Arndt Simon
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-05-17

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Crystal structure of hexa-aqua-dichlorido-ytterbium(III) chloride.

Authors:  Kevin M Knopf; Guy Crundwell; Barry L Westcott
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-05-07

2.  Faster Synthesis of Beta-Diketonate Ternary Europium Complexes: Elapsed Times & Reaction Yields.

Authors:  Nathalia B D Lima; Anderson I S Silva; P C Gerson; Simone M C Gonçalves; Alfredo M Simas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Spectroscopic Study into Lanthanide Speciation in Deep Eutectic Solvents.

Authors:  James T M Amphlett; Yunu Lee; Wonseok Yang; Dokyu Kang; Nark-Eon Sung; Jaeyeong Park; Euo Chang Jung; Sungyeol Choi
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-12-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.