| Literature DB >> 26090105 |
Byeng Ryel Min1, Sandra Solaiman1, Thomas Terrill2, Aina Ramsay3, Irene Mueller-Harvey3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pine bark is a rich source of phytochemical compounds including tannins, phenolic acids, anthocyanins, and fatty acids. These phytochemicals have potential to significantly impact on animal health and animal production. The goal of this work is to measure the effects of tannins in ground pine bark as a partial feed replacement on feed intake, dietary apparent digestibility, nitrogen balance, and mineral retention in meat goats.Entities:
Keywords: Digestibility; Goats; Phytochemicals; Tannins
Year: 2015 PMID: 26090105 PMCID: PMC4472257 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-015-0020-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Ingredients and chemical composition of experimental diets and diet ingredients, i.e. pine bark (PB), wheat straw (WS), and bermudagrass hay (BGH)
| Grain Mix (% PB), % | Ingredient, % | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | 0 | 15 | 30 | SEM | PB | WS | BGH |
| Ingredient of the grain/pine bark mix, % as is | |||||||
| Ground pine bark | 0 | 15 | 30 | - | - | - | - |
| Ground wheat straw | 30 | 15 | 0 | - | - | - | - |
| Corn | 20 | 20 | 20 | - | - | - | - |
| Soybean meal, 48 % CP | 18.5 | 20 | 21 | - | - | - | - |
| Soy hulls | 4.5 | 5 | 4 | - | - | - | - |
| Alfalfa meal | 5 | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | - |
| Molasses | 6 | 6 | 6 | - | - | - | - |
| Vitamins and mineral mixa | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | - |
| Salt | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | - |
| NH4Cl | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | - |
| BGH | 15 | 15 | 15 | - | - | - | - |
| Chemical composition, % DM ( | |||||||
| DM | 89.7 | 87.8 | 87.3 | 0.77 | 83.6 | 83.5 | 91.4 |
| CP | 15.7 | 16.8 | 16.1 | 0.41 | 1.2 | 4.1 | 7.3 |
| ADF | 23.7 | 23.2 | 23.6 | 1.42 | 72.1 | 49.2 | 37.3 |
| NDF | 35.0 | 31.8 | 27.5 | 1.77 | 78.6 | 79.0 | 69.2 |
| NFCb | 42.1 | 42.5 | 47.1 | 1.91 | 17.1 | 16.7 | 19.1 |
| Ash | 6.4 | 6.2 | 5.9 | 0.31 | 2.25 | 2.0 | 4.84 |
| Lignin | 5.9 | 9.9 | 12.4 | 0.85 | 21.3 | 8.01 | 6.29 |
| Ether Extract | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 0.25 | 1.65 | 0.42 | 1.51 |
| TDN | 66.6 | 64.1 | 64.4 | 1.75 | 36.7 | 52.0 | 56.3 |
| NEm (Mcal/kg) | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.54 |
| NEg (Mcal/kg) | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.28 |
| Ca | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.04 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.39 |
| P | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.19 |
| Mg | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.24 |
| K | 1.19 | 1.12 | 1.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.31 | 0.99 |
| S | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.20 |
| Na | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Cu, ppm | 34.7 | 25.3 | 19.7 | 8.01 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Mn, ppm | 118.3 | 108.3 | 94.3 | 12.0 | 30.0 | 63.0 | 43.0 |
| Zn, ppm | 133.0 | 142.3 | 152.0 | 14.6 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 20.0 |
| Fe, ppm | 192.7 | 203.6 | 196.6 | 19.09 | 384 | 111 | 211.3 |
| CT, % DMc | 0.19 | 1.63 | 3.20 | 0.19 | 10.3 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
a Guaranteed analysis: calcium, 9.0 %; phosphorus, 8.0 %; salt, 41 %; potassium, 0.10 %; copper, 1750 ppm; selenium, 25 ppm; zinc, 7500 ppm; vitamin A, 308,000 IU/kg; vitamin D, 24,200 IU/kg; vitamin E, 1650 IU/kg
b NFC non-fiber carbohydrate. NFC was calculated by difference [100 – (%NDF + %CP + %Fat + Ash)]
c Condensed tannins (CT) are relative to a purified Quebracho condensed tannins standard (on DM basis). TDN total digestible nutrient, DM dry matter, CP crude protein, NDF neutral detergent fiber, ADF acid detergent fiber, CT condensed tannins
Condensed tannin and flavonol compositions of pine bark after thiolysis with benzyl mercaptan
| Item | Pine bark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total CT | Extractable CT | Unextractable CT | SD | |
| Condensed tannins (CT) | ||||
| CT (Bu-HCL) | 10.3 | 8.7 | 1.7 | 0.15 |
| CT (Thiolysis) | ||||
| mDP | 10.5 | 2.6 | 11.1 | 0.15 |
| %PC in CT | 87.6 | 54.8 | 94.5 | 0.73 |
| %PD in CT | 12.4 | 45.2 | 5.5 | 0.36 |
| % cis-flavan-3-ols in CT | 76.9 | 48.72 | 80.2 | 0.46 |
| % trans-flavan-3ols in CT | 23.1 | 51.28 | 19.8 | 0.57 |
| Flavan-3-ol composition of CT (%) | ||||
| a GC | 2.0 | 30.4 | 0.0 | 0.15 |
| a EGC | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| a C | 7.1 | 7.6 | 8.4 | 0.26 |
| a EC | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.02 |
| GC-BM | 1.5 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 0.12 |
| EGC-BM | 8.9 | 10.5 | 5.5 | 0.57 |
| C-BM | 12.7 | 9.0 | 11.4 | 0.55 |
| EC-BM | 67.4 | 38.2 | 74.0 | 0.74 |
CT condensed tannins, PC procyanidins, PD prodelphinidins, GC gallocatechin, EGC epigallocatechin, C catechin, EC epicatechin, mDP mean degree of polymerization; flavan-3-ols composition is expressed in terms of relative molar percentages; a: flavan-3-ols in terminal position of the tannins; BM benzylmercaptan adduct, for flavan-3-ols in extender position
Nitrogen utilization by goats fed various levels of pine bark (PB) supplementation
| Treatment (% PB) |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | 0 | 15 | 30 | SEM | Linear | Quadratic |
| No. of animals | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||
| N intake, g/d | 24.3 | 26.1 | 26.5 | 2.14 | 0.48 | 0.80 |
| Fecal N, g/d | 6.2 | 6.6 | 7.4 | 0.67 | 0.21 | 0.84 |
| Urinary N, g/d | 6.6 | 6.4 | 9.1 | 0.87 | 0.06 | 0.18 |
| N-balance, g/d | 11.5 | 13.1 | 10.0 | 1.01 | 0.33 | 0.01 |
| N-balance, % N intake | 47.0 | 50.0 | 37.0 | 3.92 | 0.28 | 0.05 |
* Based on orthogonal contrast for equally spaced treatments
There were no treatment × period interactions (P > 0.10) hence only the main effects are reported
Apparent nutrient intake, digestibility and major mineral utilization of diets by goats consuming various levels of pine bark (PB) supplementation
| Treatment (% PB) |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | 0 | 15 | 30 | SEM | Linear | Quadratic |
| No. of animals | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||
| Average BW | 33.2 | 31.1 | 31.8 | 1.49 | 0.52 | 0.47 |
| DMI, kg/d | 1.02 | 1.01 | 1.10 | 0.80 | 0.49 | 0.68 |
| Digestible DMI, kg/d | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.05 |
| Digestible CP intake, | 119.4 | 121.4 | 106.8 | 7.50 | 0.43 | 0.28 |
| kg/d | ||||||
| Intake, g/kg BW | ||||||
| DM | 31.3 | 28.8 | 34.3 | 1.36 | 0.12 | 0.03 |
| CP | 4.7 | 4.5 | 5.2 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.17 |
| NDF | 11.9 | 10.4 | 11.1 | 0.40 | 0.16 | 0.02 |
| ADF | 7.8 | 7.1 | 8.6 | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| Lignin | 1.94 | 3.2 | 4.0 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| NFC | 12.1 | 11.1 | 14.3 | 0.66 | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| Ash | 1.96 | 1.75 | 1.97 | 0.08 | 0.94 | 0.04 |
| CT (butanol-HCl) | 0.06 | 0.44 | 1.11 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 0.01 |
| TDN, % | 66.6 | 64.1 | 64.5 | 0.78 | 0.06 | 0.16 |
| Fecal DM output, g/d | 347.8 | 334.0 | 373.9 | 32.56 | 0.58 | 0.51 |
| Fecal DM output, g/BW | 10.6 | 10.5 | 12.0 | 0.56 | 0.09 | 0.28 |
| Digestibility, % | ||||||
| DM | 66.3 | 63.3 | 65.0 | 1.67 | 0.59 | 0.26 |
| CP | 73.5 | 71.1 | 69.6 | 1.64 | 0.09 | 0.84 |
| NDF | 48.8 | 39.4 | 36.5 | 2.84 | 0.01 | 0.36 |
| ADF | 47.4 | 34.2 | 29.7 | 3.45 | 0.001 | 0.30 |
| NFCa | 63.1 | 58.2 | 60.1 | 2.12 | 0.33 | 0.19 |
| Lignin | 41.1 | 27.7 | 18.2 | 4.50 | 0.001 | 0.73 |
| Ash | 65.5 | 62.3 | 64.3 | 1.74 | 0.61 | 0.23 |
| Digested mineralb, g/d | ||||||
| Ca | 37.8 | 41.5 | 45.6 | 3.21 | 0.09 | 0.95 |
| P | 2.9 | 9.4 | 20.7 | 5.44 | 0.03 | 0.72 |
| Mg | 46.5 | 42.8 | 57.4 | 2.98 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| K | 79.8 | 71.9 | 61.2 | 3.47 | 0.001 | 0.75 |
| S | 61.9 | 59.4 | 56.9 | 2.19 | 0.11 | 0.99 |
| Na | 27.0 | 41.8 | 33.5 | 5.03 | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Cu, mg/d | 62.8 | 63.2 | 47.1 | 6.02 | 0.07 | 0.27 |
| Mn, mg/d | 20.3 | 33.9 | 36.8 | 4.35 | 0.01 | 0.33 |
| Zn, mg/d | 28.7 | 30.9 | 46.6 | 4.37 | 0.01 | 0.22 |
| Fe, mg/d | 12.6 | 20.2 | 21.8 | 3.68 | 0.09 | 0.51 |
* Based on orthogonal contrast for equally spaced treatments
a NFC non-fiber carbohydrate, DMI dry matter (DM) intake, CP crude protein, NDF neutral detergent fiber, ADF acid detergent fiber
b Digested mineral = Intake of minerals (g/DM)–fecal mineral contents (g/DM) during 24 h sample collection