Literature DB >> 26089728

Doctor, what are my options? A prospective cohort study of an individualized care plan for patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

A E Hird1, M Lemke1, M Turovsky1, V Malecki1, K Kumar1, C DeAngelis2, E Chow3, Y J Ko1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For cancer patients, information about their disease and its treatment is often delivered within a short time period, potentially leading to patient misunderstanding, which can impede optimal patient care. In this 3-part clinical study, we investigated the utility of an individualized care plan for patients with gastrointestinal (gi) cancer starting a new treatment.
METHODS: In part 1, a comprehensive literature search identified items for potential inclusion in the care plan. Those items were formatted into a questionnaire. The questionnaire was then administered to patients as a structured interview. In part 2, health care professionals involved in the care of patients with gi cancer evaluated the resulting care plan for content and relevancy. In part 3, a 20-week prospective cohort study (10 weeks using standard of care, 10 weeks using individualized care plans) was conducted. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 2-4 weeks after administration of the care plan.
RESULTS: In part 1, a 73-item questionnaire was developed and completed by 20 patients in semi-structured interviews. In part 2, long and short versions of the care plan were created. Most health care professionals preferred the long version. Based on their comments, a final version of the care plan was created. The part 3 study enrolled 104 patients. Overall satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the intervention group at baseline (p = 0.010) and follow-up (p = 0.005). Compared with control patients, the intervention cohort also reported significantly higher overall quality of life (p = 0.044) and fewer symptoms of anxiety (p = 0.048) at follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Provision of an individualized care plan resulted in improvements in outcome measures at both baseline and follow-up. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastrointestinal cancer; care plans; communication; patient satisfaction; quality of life

Year:  2015        PMID: 26089728      PMCID: PMC4462539          DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  29 in total

1.  Perceived social support, uncertainty, and quality of life of younger breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  A Sammarco
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  Oncology providers' evaluation of the use of an automatically generated cancer survivorship care plan: longitudinal results from the ROGY Care trial.

Authors:  Kim A H Nicolaije; Nicole P M Ezendam; M Caroline Vos; Johanna M A Pijnenborg; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Roy F P M Kruitwagen
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  M M Oken; R H Creech; D C Tormey; J Horton; T E Davis; E T McFadden; P P Carbone
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.339

4.  Implementing the commission on cancer standards for survivorship care plans.

Authors:  Carrie Tompkins Stricker; Michele O'Brien
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.027

5.  Associations of race, education, and patterns of preventive service use with stage of cancer at time of diagnosis.

Authors:  Marian E Gornick; Paul W Eggers; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  'Admission into a helping plan': a watershed between positive and negative experiences in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sara Lilliehorn; Katarina Hamberg; Anneli Kero; Pär Salander
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure.

Authors:  D F Cella; D S Tulsky; G Gray; B Sarafian; E Linn; A Bonomi; M Silberman; S B Yellen; P Winicour; J Brannon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Uncertainty and quality of life of older men who undergo watchful waiting for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Meredith Wallace
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Evaluating a nurse-led survivorship care package (SurvivorCare) for bowel cancer survivors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael Jefford; Sanchia Aranda; Karla Gough; Kerryann Lotfi-Jam; Phyllis Butow; Mei Krishnasamy; Jane Young; Jo Phipps-Nelson; Lahiru Russell; Dorothy King; Penelope Schofield
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale.

Authors:  R Philip Snaith
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantifying the relationship between patient characteristics and involvement in developing and implementing a treatment plan.

Authors:  Natalie T Roy; Erin E Ulrich
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2017-01-16

Review 2.  Personalized Care Management for Persons with Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Angelika D van Halteren; Marten Munneke; Eva Smit; Sue Thomas; Bastiaan R Bloem; Sirwan K L Darweesh
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 5.568

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.