Meredith Wallace1. 1. School of Nursing, Fairfield University, Connecticut, USA. amwallace1@netzero.net
Abstract
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To explore uncertainty, anxiety, and the personal manner in which uncertainty is understood, and explain the health-related and affective quality of life (QOL) of men who undergo watchful waiting for prostate cancer. DESIGN: Descriptive, quantitative, survey approach. SETTING: United States. SAMPLE: A national sample of 21 men diagnosed with prostate cancer (mean age = 76 years) who had elected to receive no treatment for their disease. METHODS: 19 subjects who met the criteria contacted the researcher and completed the mailed questionnaire. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Uncertainty and QOL. FINDINGS: Moderate yet significant relationships were found between each of the independent variables. Significant relationships were found among uncertainty, anxiety, and the perception of danger (a dimension of QOL). Using hierarchical multiple regression, a model was built to explain 60% of the variance in this QOL dimension. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports that men who undergo watchful waiting are uncertain and that this uncertainty results in their perception of danger and influences their affective health-functioning QOL. This study lends further support for the Uncertainty in Illness Model in the watchful waiting population. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The findings of this study imply that increased teaching and patient care management regarding watchful waiting are needed both before and after the treatment decision has been made. This study provides the framework for further study on interventions to improve the QOL of this population.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To explore uncertainty, anxiety, and the personal manner in which uncertainty is understood, and explain the health-related and affective quality of life (QOL) of men who undergo watchful waiting for prostate cancer. DESIGN: Descriptive, quantitative, survey approach. SETTING: United States. SAMPLE: A national sample of 21 men diagnosed with prostate cancer (mean age = 76 years) who had elected to receive no treatment for their disease. METHODS: 19 subjects who met the criteria contacted the researcher and completed the mailed questionnaire. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Uncertainty and QOL. FINDINGS: Moderate yet significant relationships were found between each of the independent variables. Significant relationships were found among uncertainty, anxiety, and the perception of danger (a dimension of QOL). Using hierarchical multiple regression, a model was built to explain 60% of the variance in this QOL dimension. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports that men who undergo watchful waiting are uncertain and that this uncertainty results in their perception of danger and influences their affective health-functioning QOL. This study lends further support for the Uncertainty in Illness Model in the watchful waiting population. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The findings of this study imply that increased teaching and patient care management regarding watchful waiting are needed both before and after the treatment decision has been made. This study provides the framework for further study on interventions to improve the QOL of this population.
Authors: Lixin Song; Laurel L Northouse; Thomas M Braun; Lingling Zhang; Bernadine Cimprich; David L Ronis; Darlene W Mood Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Donald E Bailey; Meredith Wallace; David M Latini; Josephine Hegarty; Peter R Carroll; Eric A Klein; Peter C Albertsen Journal: Appl Nurs Res Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 2.257
Authors: Thomas A D'Agostino; Elyse Shuk; Erin K Maloney; Rebecca Zeuren; R Michael Tuttle; Carma L Bylund Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Maya Shaha; Vinciya Pandian; Michael A Choti; Eden Stotsky; Joseph M Herman; Yasmin Khan; Carol Libonati; Timothy M Pawlik; Richard D Schulick; Anne E Belcher Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-02-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Donald E Bailey; Julie Barroso; Andrew J Muir; Richard Sloane; Jacqui Richmond; John McHutchison; Keyur Patel; Lawrence Landerman; Merle H Mishel Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Meredith Wallace Kazer; Donald E Bailey; Jonathan Chipman; Sarah P Psutka; Jill Hardy; Larry Hembroff; Meredith Regan; Rodney L Dunn; Catrina Crociani; Martin G Sanda Journal: BJU Int Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 5.588