| Literature DB >> 26089589 |
Gerald Auer1, Werner E Piller1, Mathias Harzhauser2.
Abstract
Within a 5.5-m-thick succession of upper Burdigalian (CNP-zone NN4) shallow neritic sediments from the NorthEntities:
Keywords: Calcareous nannoplankton; Early Miocene; High-resolution; North Alpine Foreland Basin; Palaeoecology; Small-scale environmental change
Year: 2014 PMID: 26089589 PMCID: PMC4459667 DOI: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2014.06.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Micropaleontol ISSN: 0377-8398 Impact factor: 2.415
Fig. 1Location map showing the geographical position of the clay pit near Laa an der Thaya in Lower Austria where the studied section is located.
Fig. 2Global and regional Miocene chronostratigraphy and nannoplankton stratigraphy. Global chronostratigraphy follows Gradstein et al. (2012 and references therein). Sequence stratigraphy after Hardenbol et al. (1988). Regional stratigraphy of the Central Paratethys after Harzhauser and Piller (2007) with calibrated ages of the Ottnangian and Karpatian after Grunert et al. (2010b) and Dellmour and Harzhauser (2012).
Fig. 3Lithologs of the 5.5-metre-outcrop and the high-resolution section. Position of the HR-section within the 5.5-metre-section is indicated by the grey rectangle. Gamma-ray emission and magnetic susceptibility logs are shown as black lines. A three point running mean was calculated for both measurements and is shown as mirrored column for both measurements. The gamma-ray log was used to reconstruct changes in relative sea level.
Fig. 4Sedimentological (% of grains > 63 μm) and geochemical data (amount of carbonate, organic carbon and sulphur as well as the C/S-ratio) of the high-resolution section. Coccolith abundances are shown as coccoliths encountered per field of view under the light microscope and the abundance of clearly autochthonous and allochthonous specimens in %. The coloured and labelled columns indicate Intervals A–E.
Fig. 5Relative abundances of autochthonous coccolith taxa > 1% as well as the abundance of autochthonous taxa < 1%, normalized to 100%, within each sample of the high-resolution section. Diversity indices show the amount of autochthonous taxa, the Shannon–Wiener index, species evenness and the dominance index of the studied samples. The coloured and labelled columns indicate Intervals A–E.
Fig. 6(a) R-mode cluster analysis of arcsine-root method transformed abundances of all encountered autochthonous taxa using Ward's method. Clusters, indicated by the coloured areas, represent taxa with similar ecological preferences. (b) Non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis of the autochthonous assemblage. Arrows are used to indicate ecological factors, which may determine the distribution of the taxa within the plot.
Fig. 7Q-mode cluster analysis of arcsine-root method transformed abundances of the five key taxa (Coccolithus pelagicus, Cyclicargolithus floridanus, Reticulofenestra haqii, Reticulofenestra minuta, Reticulofenestra pseudoumbilicus) combined with the abundance of taxa < 1% and the amount of allochthonous taxa. Significant clusters were numbered (1–3) with their sub-assemblages labelled a and b respectively, and assigned colours. The colour-code was applied to each layer according to their cluster-affiliation within the section and plotted in conjunction with sedimentological, geochemical and coccolith abundance data. The thickness of the coloured bars indicates the thickness and positions of each sampled layer within the section.
SIMPER analysis using Bray–Curtis similarity showing the contribution (in percent) of all used groups of calcareous nannofossils to their respective taphogroups (TG) 1a,b; 2a,b; 3a,b.
| Group | Contribution | Cumulative % | TG 1a | TG 1b | TG 2a | TG 2b | TG 3a | TG 3b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allochthonous taxa | 3.267 | 22.89 | 31.90 | 40.00 | 30.80 | 28.80 | 38.00 | 30.00 |
| 3.000 | 43.90 | 22.00 | 12.50 | 15.20 | 10.90 | 5.45 | 12.60 | |
| 2.941 | 64.51 | 30.10 | 29.30 | 30.10 | 37.40 | 36.00 | 37.20 | |
| 1.897 | 77.79 | 5.95 | 6.83 | 11.80 | 10.70 | 8.78 | 7.22 | |
| 1.493 | 88.25 | 2.81 | 4.17 | 7.80 | 7.66 | 5.78 | 5.11 | |
| Autochthonous taxa < 1% | 0.955 | 94.94 | 3.94 | 4.73 | 2.18 | 3.47 | 4.14 | 4.92 |
| 0.722 | 100.00 | 3.22 | 2.55 | 1.99 | 1.05 | 1.79 | 2.90 |
Fig. 8Q-mode non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis of the high-resolution section. Colours indicate the cluster affiliated with each sample. Arrows indicate the possible ecological conditions that determined the distribution of the samples within the plot.
Fig. 9Graphical representation the five described intervals (Interval A–E), as a labelled column. The intervals were additionally plotted in conjunction with key sedimentological, geochemical and coccolith abundance data (see Fig. 6) transformed to reflect the thickness of each layer.