Literature DB >> 12759476

Pseudo-cryptic speciation in coccolithophores.

Alberto G Saez1, Ian Probert, Markus Geisen, Patrick Quinn, Jeremy R Young, Linda K Medlin.   

Abstract

Coccolithophores are a group of calcifying unicellular algae that constitute a major fraction of oceanic primary productivity, play an important role in the global carbon cycle, and are key biostratigraphic marker fossils. Their taxonomy is primarily based on the morphology of the minute calcite plates, or coccoliths, covering the cell. These are diverse and include widespread fine scale variation, of which the biological/taxonomic significance is unknown. Do they represent phenotypic plasticity, genetic polymorphisms, or species-specific characters? Our research on five commonly occurring coccolithophores supports the hypothesis that such variation represents pseudocryptic speciation events, occurring between 0.3 and 12.9 million years ago from a molecular clock estimation. This finding suggests strong stabilizing selection acting on coccolithophorid phenotypes. Our results also provide strong support for the use of fine scale morphological characters of coccoliths in the fossil record to improve biostratigraphic resolution and paleoceanographic data retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12759476      PMCID: PMC165847          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1132069100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  10 in total

1.  Molecular evidence for genetic mixing of Arctic and Antarctic subpolar populations of planktonic foraminifers.

Authors:  K F Darling; C M Wade; I A Stewart; D Kroon; R Dingle; A J Brown
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  J P Huelsenbeck; F Ronquist
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Speciation in the fossil record.

Authors:  M J. Benton; P N. Pearson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution.

Authors:  D Posada; K A Crandall
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution.

Authors:  D Posada; K A Crandall
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution.

Authors:  F Rodríguez; J L Oliver; A Marín; J R Medina
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-02-22       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions.

Authors:  L Medlin; H J Elwood; S Stickel; M L Sogin
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1988-11-30       Impact factor: 3.688

8.  Phylogenetic test of the molecular clock and linearized trees.

Authors:  N Takezaki; A Rzhetsky; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Molecular evidence of cryptic speciation in planktonic foraminifers and their relation to oceanic provinces.

Authors:  C de Vargas; R Norris; L Zaninetti; S W Gibb; J Pawlowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Cryptic species of planktonic foraminifera: their effect on palaeoceanographic reconstructions.

Authors:  Michal Kucera; Kate F Darling
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 4.226

  10 in total
  38 in total

1.  Cryptic speciation on the high seas; global phylogenetics of the copepod family Eucalanidae.

Authors:  Erica Goetze
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Limits to gene flow in a cosmopolitan marine planktonic diatom.

Authors:  Griet Casteleyn; Frederik Leliaert; Thierry Backeljau; Ann-Eline Debeer; Yuichi Kotaki; Lesley Rhodes; Nina Lundholm; Koen Sabbe; Wim Vyverman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The extent of protist diversity: insights from molecular ecology of freshwater eukaryotes.

Authors:  Jan Slapeta; David Moreira; Purificación López-García
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Molecular comparisons of freshwater and marine isolates of the same morphospecies of heterotrophic flagellates.

Authors:  Frank Scheckenbach; Claudia Wylezich; Alexander P Mylnikov; Markus Weitere; Hartmut Arndt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Mating trials validate the use of DNA barcoding to reveal cryptic speciation of a marine bryozoan taxon.

Authors:  Africa Gómez; Peter J Wright; David H Lunt; Juan M Cancino; Gary R Carvalho; Roger N Hughes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Global molecular phylogeography reveals persistent Arctic circumpolar isolation in a marine planktonic protist.

Authors:  Kate F Darling; Michal Kucera; Christopher M Wade
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Competition between cryptic species explains variations in rates of lineage evolution.

Authors:  Samuel Alizon; Michal Kucera; Vincent A A Jansen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evidence for abrupt speciation in a classic case of gradual evolution.

Authors:  Pincelli M Hull; Richard D Norris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  How discordant morphological and molecular evolution among microorganisms can revise our notions of biodiversity on Earth.

Authors:  Daniel J G Lahr; Haywood Dail Laughinghouse; Angela M Oliverio; Feng Gao; Laura A Katz
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 4.345

10.  Genome size differentiates co-occurring populations of the planktonic diatom Ditylum brightwellii (Bacillariophyta).

Authors:  Julie A Koester; Jarred E Swalwell; Peter von Dassow; E Virginia Armbrust
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-02       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.