Literature DB >> 26089528

Kinematics and aerodynamics of avian upstrokes during slow flight.

Kristen E Crandell1, Bret W Tobalske2.   

Abstract

Slow flight is extremely energetically costly per unit time, yet highly important for takeoff and survival. However, at slow speeds it is presently thought that most birds do not produce beneficial aerodynamic forces during the entire wingbeat: instead they fold or flex their wings during upstroke, prompting the long-standing prediction that the upstroke produces trivial forces. There is increasing evidence that the upstroke contributes to force production, but the aerodynamic and kinematic mechanisms remain unknown. Here, we examined the wingbeat cycle of two species: the diamond dove (Geopelia cuneata) and zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), which exhibit different upstroke styles - a wingtip-reversal and flexed-wing upstroke, respectively. We used a combination of particle image velocimetry and near-wake streamline measures alongside detailed 3D kinematics. We show that during the middle of the wingtip-reversal upstroke, the hand-wing has a high angular velocity (15.3±0.8 deg ms(-1)) and translational speed (8.4±0.6 m s(-1)). The flexed-wing upstroke, in contrast, has low wingtip speed during mid-upstroke. Instead, later in the stroke cycle, during the transition from upstroke to downstroke, it exhibits higher angular velocities (45.5±13.8 deg ms(-1)) and translational speeds (11.0±1.9 m s(-1)). Aerodynamically, the wingtip-reversal upstroke imparts momentum to the wake, with entrained air shed backward (visible as circulation of 14.4±0.09 m(2) s(-1)). In contrast, the flexed-wing upstroke imparts minimal momentum. Clap and peel in the dove enhances the time course for circulation production on the wings, and provides new evidence of convergent evolution on time-varying aerodynamic mechanisms during flapping in insects and birds.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clap and peel; Flexed-wing; Lift; Particle image velocimetry; Take-off; Thrust; Wingtip-reversal

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26089528     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.116228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  The influence of aspect ratio and stroke pattern on force generation of a bat-inspired membrane wing.

Authors:  Cosima Schunk; Sharon M Swartz; Kenneth S Breuer
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.

Authors:  Diana D Chin; Laura Y Matloff; Amanda Kay Stowers; Emily R Tucci; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Evolution of avian flight: muscles and constraints on performance.

Authors:  Bret W Tobalske
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Flight feather attachment in rock pigeons (Columba livia): covert feathers and smooth muscle coordinate a morphing wing.

Authors:  Tobin L Hieronymus
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Mechanical power curve measured in the wake of pied flycatchers indicates modulation of parasite power across flight speeds.

Authors:  L Christoffer Johansson; Masateru Maeda; Per Henningsson; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Great tits do not compensate over time for a radio-tag-induced reduction in escape-flight performance.

Authors:  Barbara M Tomotani; Florian T Muijres; Bronwyn Johnston; Henk P van der Jeugd; Marc Naguib
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Three-dimensional simulation for fast forward flight of a calliope hummingbird.

Authors:  Jialei Song; Bret W Tobalske; Donald R Powers; Tyson L Hedrick; Haoxiang Luo
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Quantifying the dynamic wing morphing of hovering hummingbird.

Authors:  Masateru Maeda; Toshiyuki Nakata; Ikuo Kitamura; Hiroto Tanaka; Hao Liu
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.963

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.