Literature DB >> 26089441

The 2014 Garrod Lecture: EUCAST - are we heading towards international agreement?

Gunnar Kahlmeter1.   

Abstract

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing with phenotypic methods is based on the measurement of the MIC (mg/L) and breakpoints to categorize bacteria and fungi as susceptible, intermediate or resistant. Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing requires an agreement on breakpoints and a rigorous standardization of methods and materials. Requirements for defining breakpoints include a definition of doses and dose intervals, information on MIC distributions for the target organisms, definitions of the highest MIC for organisms devoid of phenotypically expressed resistance (the epidemiological cut-off) and information on resistance mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical outcome in trials. In 2001, the breakpoint committees of France, Germany, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK were tasked with developing European breakpoints under the umbrella of EUCAST, organized by ESCMID and later also by ECDC. Breakpoints for previously established antibacterial and antifungal agents in Europe have now been harmonized. With the EMA, EUCAST has since 2006 determined breakpoints for new agents. All breakpoints are freely available on the EUCAST web site; these are used in semi-automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing devices and have been employed since 2010 in a EUCAST disc diffusion method. They have been or are now being implemented in most countries inside Europe and many countries outside it. Everything needed to perform and interpret antimicrobial susceptibility testing is freely available from the EUCAST web site, as are aggregated MIC distributions based on more than 26 000 distributions.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  CLSI; European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; breakpoints

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26089441     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkv145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  31 in total

1.  On the Consequences of Poorly Defined Breakpoints for Rifampin Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex.

Authors:  Claudio U Köser; Sophia B Georghiou; Thomas Schön; Max Salfinger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Breakpoints against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Wright W Nichols; Gregory G Stone; Paul Newell; Helen Broadhurst; Angela Wardman; Merran MacPherson; Katrina Yates; Todd Riccobene; Ian A Critchley; Shampa Das
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Role of Clinicogenomics in Infectious Disease Diagnostics and Public Health Microbiology.

Authors:  Lars F Westblade; Alex van Belkum; Adam Grundhoff; George M Weinstock; Eric G Pamer; Mark J Pallen; W Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Factors influencing susceptibility testing of antifungal drugs: a critical review of document M27-A4 from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).

Authors:  Edinaira Sulany Oliveira de Sousa; Ana Claúdia Alves Cortez; Marcia de Souza Carvalho Melhem; Hagen Frickmann; João Vicente Braga de Souza
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.476

5.  Standards for MIC testing that apply to the majority of bacterial pathogens should also be enforced for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.

Authors:  T Schön; E Matuschek; S Mohamed; M Utukuri; S Heysell; J-W Alffenaar; S Shin; E Martinez; V Sintchenko; F P Maurer; P M Keller; G Kahlmeter; C U Köser
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 6.  Update from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST).

Authors:  Christian G Giske; John Turnidge; Rafael Cantón; Gunnar Kahlmeter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 11.677

7.  Wild-Type and Non-Wild-Type Mycobacterium tuberculosis MIC Distributions for the Novel Fluoroquinolone Antofloxacin Compared with Those for Ofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin.

Authors:  Xia Yu; Guirong Wang; Suting Chen; Guomei Wei; Yuanyuan Shang; Lingling Dong; Thomas Schön; Danesh Moradigaravand; Julian Parkhill; Sharon J Peacock; Claudio U Köser; Hairong Huang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  What Is Resistance? Impact of Phenotypic versus Molecular Drug Resistance Testing on Therapy for Multi- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Jan Heyckendorf; Sönke Andres; Claudio U Köser; Ioana D Olaru; Thomas Schön; Erik Sturegård; Patrick Beckert; Viola Schleusener; Thomas A Kohl; Doris Hillemann; Danesh Moradigaravand; Julian Parkhill; Sharon J Peacock; Stefan Niemann; Christoph Lange; Matthias Merker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Genomic and functional analyses of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains implicate ald in D-cycloserine resistance.

Authors:  Christopher A Desjardins; Keira A Cohen; Vanisha Munsamy; Thomas Abeel; Kashmeel Maharaj; Bruce J Walker; Terrance P Shea; Deepak V Almeida; Abigail L Manson; Alex Salazar; Nesri Padayatchi; Max R O'Donnell; Koleka P Mlisana; Jennifer Wortman; Bruce W Birren; Jacques Grosset; Ashlee M Earl; Alexander S Pym
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Comparison of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines for the interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility at a University teaching hospital in Nairobi, Kenya: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ali Kassim; Geoffrey Omuse; Zul Premji; Gunturu Revathi
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.