Literature DB >> 26085644

Exchange of Cone for Rod Phosphodiesterase 6 Catalytic Subunits in Rod Photoreceptors Mimics in Part Features of Light Adaptation.

Anurima Majumder1, Johan Pahlberg2, Hakim Muradov1, Kimberly K Boyd1, Alapakkam P Sampath3, Nikolai O Artemyev4.   

Abstract

Despite the expression of homologous phototransduction components, the molecular basis for differences in light-evoked responses between rod and cone photoreceptors remains unclear. We examined the role of cGMP phosphodiesterase (PDE6) in this difference by expressing cone PDE6 (PDE6C) in rd1/rd1 rods lacking rod PDE6 (PDE6AB) using transgenic mice. The expression of PDE6C rescues retinal degeneration observed in rd1/rd1 rods. Double-transgenic rods (PDE6C++) were compared with rd1/+ rods based on similar PDE6 expression. PDE6C increased the basal PDE activity and speeded the rate-limiting step for phototransduction deactivation, causing rod photoresponses to appear light adapted, with reduced dark current and sensitivity and faster response kinetics. When PDE6C++ and rd1/+ rods were exposed to similar background light, rd1/+ rods displayed greater desensitization. These results indicate an increased spontaneous activity and faster deactivation of PDE6C compared with PDE6AB in darkness, but that background light increases steady PDE6C activity to a lesser extent. In addition to accelerating the recovery of the photoresponse, faster PDE6C deactivation may blunt the rise in background-induced steady PDE6C activity. Therefore, higher basal PDE6C activity and faster deactivation together partially account for faster and less sensitive cone photoresponses in darkness, whereas a reduced rise of steady PDE6C activity in background light may allow cones to avoid saturation. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Cones are the primary photoreceptors responsible for most of our visual experience. Cone light responses are less sensitive and display speeded responses compared with rods. Despite the fact that rods and cones use a G-protein signaling cascade with similar organization, the mechanistic basis for these differences remains unclear. Here, we examined the role of distinct isoforms of PDE6, the effector enzyme in phototransduction, in these differences. We developed a transgenic mouse model that expresses cone PDE6 in rods and show that the cone PDE6 isoform is partially responsible for the difference in sensitivity and response kinetics between rods and cones.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/359225-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PDE6; cones; phototransduction; retina; rods

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26085644      PMCID: PMC4469743          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3563-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  50 in total

1.  Effects of low AIPL1 expression on phototransduction in rods.

Authors:  Clint L Makino; Xiao-Hong Wen; Norman Michaud; Igor V Peshenko; Basil Pawlyk; Richard S Brush; Maria Soloviev; Xiaoqing Liu; Michael L Woodruff; Peter D Calvert; Andrey B Savchenko; Robert E Anderson; Gordon L Fain; Tiansen Li; Michael A Sandberg; Alexander M Dizhoor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Phototransduction in mouse rods and cones.

Authors:  Yingbin Fu; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 3.657

3.  Molecular origin of continuous dark noise in rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  F Rieke; D A Baylor
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Physiological features of the S- and M-cone photoreceptors of wild-type mice from single-cell recordings.

Authors:  Sergei S Nikonov; Roman Kholodenko; Janis Lem; Edward N Pugh
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  RGS expression rate-limits recovery of rod photoresponses.

Authors:  Claudia M Krispel; Desheng Chen; Nathan Melling; Yu-Jiun Chen; Kirill A Martemyanov; Nidia Quillinan; Vadim Y Arshavsky; Theodore G Wensel; Ching-Kang Chen; Marie E Burns
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Controlling the gain of rod-mediated signals in the Mammalian retina.

Authors:  Felice A Dunn; Thuy Doan; Alapakkam P Sampath; Fred Rieke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Quantal noise from human red cone pigment.

Authors:  Yingbin Fu; Vladimir Kefalov; Dong-Gen Luo; Tian Xue; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Physiological properties of rod photoreceptor cells in green-sensitive cone pigment knock-in mice.

Authors:  Keisuke Sakurai; Akishi Onishi; Hiroo Imai; Osamu Chisaka; Yoshiki Ueda; Jiro Usukura; Kei Nakatani; Yoshinori Shichida
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Signaling properties of a short-wave cone visual pigment and its role in phototransduction.

Authors:  Guang Shi; King-Wai Yau; Jeannie Chen; Vladimir J Kefalov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Role for the target enzyme in deactivation of photoreceptor G protein in vivo.

Authors:  S H Tsang; M E Burns; P D Calvert; P Gouras; D A Baylor; S P Goff; V Y Arshavsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  19 in total

1.  A kinetic analysis of mouse rod and cone photoreceptor responses.

Authors:  Jürgen Reingruber; Norianne T Ingram; Khris G Griffis; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Regulation of calcium homeostasis in the outer segments of rod and cone photoreceptors.

Authors:  Frans Vinberg; Jeannie Chen; Vladimir J Kefalov
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 3.  The evolution of rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  Ala Morshedian; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Voltage-sensitive conductances increase the sensitivity of rod photoresponses following pigment bleaching.

Authors:  Johan Pahlberg; Rikard Frederiksen; Gabriel E Pollock; Kiyoharu J Miyagishima; Alapakkam P Sampath; M Carter Cornwall
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Why are rods more sensitive than cones?

Authors:  Norianne T Ingram; Alapakkam P Sampath; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  How rods respond to single photons: Key adaptations of a G-protein cascade that enable vision at the physical limit of perception.

Authors:  Jürgen Reingruber; David Holcman; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  Mechanisms of mutant PDE6 proteins underlying retinal diseases.

Authors:  Kota N Gopalakrishna; Kimberly Boyd; Nikolai O Artemyev
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.315

8.  Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-interacting Protein-like 1 Is an Obligate Chaperone of Phosphodiesterase 6 and Is Assisted by the γ-Subunit of Its Client.

Authors:  Kota N Gopalakrishna; Kimberly Boyd; Ravi P Yadav; Nikolai O Artemyev
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Calcium flares and compartmentalization in rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  Yunzhen Li; Fabio Falleroni; Simone Mortal; Ulisse Bocchero; Dan Cojoc; Vincent Torre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Photoreceptor phosphodiesterase (PDE6): activation and inactivation mechanisms during visual transduction in rods and cones.

Authors:  Rick H Cote
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.