Jeffrey D Lebensburger1, Lee M Hilliard2, Lauren E Pair2, Robert Oster3, Thomas H Howard2, Gary R Cutter4. 1. Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA jlebensburger@peds.uab.edu. 2. Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 3. Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 4. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The registry ClinicalTrials.gov was created to provide investigators and patients an accessible database of relevant clinical trials. METHODS: To understand the state of sickle cell disease clinical trials, a comprehensive review of all 174 "closed," "interventional" sickle cell trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov was completed in January 2015. RESULTS: The majority of registered sickle cell disease clinical trials listed an academic center as the primary sponsor and were an early phase trial. The primary outcome for sickle cell disease trials focused on pain (23%), bone marrow transplant (BMT) (13%), hydroxyurea (8%), iron overload (8%), and pulmonary hypertension (8%). A total of 52 trials were listed as terminated or withdrawn, including 25 (14% of all trials) terminated for failure to enroll participants. At the time of this review, only 19 trials uploaded results and 29 trials uploaded a manuscript in the ClinicalTrials.gov database. A systematic review of pubmed.gov revealed that only 35% of sickle cell studies completed prior to 2014 resulted in an identified manuscript. In comparison, of 80 thalassemia trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, four acknowledged failure to enroll participants as a reason for trial termination or withdrawal, and 48 trials (60%) completed prior to 2014 resulted in a currently identified manuscript. CONCLUSION: ClinicalTrials.gov can be an important database for investigators and patients with sickle cell disease to understand the current available research trials. To enhance the validity of the website, investigators must update their trial results and upload trial manuscripts into the database. This study, for the first time, quantifies outcomes of sickle cell disease trials and provides support to the belief that barriers exist to successful completion, publication, and dissemination of sickle cell trial results.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The registry ClinicalTrials.gov was created to provide investigators and patients an accessible database of relevant clinical trials. METHODS: To understand the state of sickle cell disease clinical trials, a comprehensive review of all 174 "closed," "interventional" sickle cell trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov was completed in January 2015. RESULTS: The majority of registered sickle cell disease clinical trials listed an academic center as the primary sponsor and were an early phase trial. The primary outcome for sickle cell disease trials focused on pain (23%), bone marrow transplant (BMT) (13%), hydroxyurea (8%), iron overload (8%), and pulmonary hypertension (8%). A total of 52 trials were listed as terminated or withdrawn, including 25 (14% of all trials) terminated for failure to enroll participants. At the time of this review, only 19 trials uploaded results and 29 trials uploaded a manuscript in the ClinicalTrials.gov database. A systematic review of pubmed.gov revealed that only 35% of sickle cell studies completed prior to 2014 resulted in an identified manuscript. In comparison, of 80 thalassemia trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, four acknowledged failure to enroll participants as a reason for trial termination or withdrawal, and 48 trials (60%) completed prior to 2014 resulted in a currently identified manuscript. CONCLUSION: ClinicalTrials.gov can be an important database for investigators and patients with sickle cell disease to understand the current available research trials. To enhance the validity of the website, investigators must update their trial results and upload trial manuscripts into the database. This study, for the first time, quantifies outcomes of sickle cell disease trials and provides support to the belief that barriers exist to successful completion, publication, and dissemination of sickle cell trial results.
Authors: Robyn J Barst; Kamal K Mubarak; Roberto F Machado; Kenneth I Ataga; Raymond L Benza; Oswaldo Castro; Robert Naeije; Namita Sood; Paul S Swerdlow; Mariana Hildesheim; Mark T Gladwin Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2010-02-17 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Winfred C Wang; Russell E Ware; Scott T Miller; Rathi V Iyer; James F Casella; Caterina P Minniti; Sohail Rana; Courtney D Thornburg; Zora R Rogers; Ram V Kalpatthi; Julio C Barredo; R Clark Brown; Sharada A Sarnaik; Thomas H Howard; Lynn W Wynn; Abdullah Kutlar; F Daniel Armstrong; Beatrice A Files; Jonathan C Goldsmith; Myron A Waclawiw; Xiangke Huang; Bruce W Thompson Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-05-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert I Liem; Allison H Cole; Stephanie A Pelligra; Maryann Mason; Alexis A Thompson Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Charles T Quinn; Marie J Stuart; Karen Kesler; Kenneth I Ataga; Winfred C Wang; Lori Styles; Kim Smith-Whitley; Ted Wun; Ashok Raj; Lewis L Hsu; Suba Krishnan; Frans A Kuypers; Yamaja Setty; Seungshin Rhee; Nigel S Key; George R Buchanan Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2011-08-16 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Martin H Steinberg; William F McCarthy; Oswaldo Castro; Samir K Ballas; F Danny Armstrong; Wally Smith; Kenneth Ataga; Paul Swerdlow; Abdullah Kutlar; Laura DeCastro; Myron A Waclawiw Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Crystal A Gadegbeku; Phyllis Kreger Stillman; Mark D Huffman; James S Jackson; John W Kusek; Kenneth A Jamerson Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2008-06-27 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Evelyn M Stevens; Chavis A Patterson; Yimei B Li; Kim Smith-Whitley; Lamia P Barakat Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jeffrey D Lebensburger; Rakeshkumar J Patel; Prasannalaxmi Palabindela; Christina J Bemrich-Stolz; Thomas H Howard; Lee M Hilliard Journal: J Blood Med Date: 2015-12-15
Authors: Marian Mitroiu; Katrien Oude Rengerink; Caridad Pontes; Aranzazu Sancho; Roser Vives; Stella Pesiou; Juan Manuel Fontanet; Ferran Torres; Stavros Nikolakopoulos; Konstantinos Pateras; Gerd Rosenkranz; Martin Posch; Susanne Urach; Robin Ristl; Armin Koch; Spineli Loukia; Johanna H van der Lee; Kit C B Roes Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 4.123