George I Papakostas1, Maurizio Fava1, Lee Baer1, Michaela B Swee1, Adrienne Jaeger1, William V Bobo1, Richard C Shelton1. 1. From the Massachusetts General Hospital Clinical Trials Network and Institute, the Massachusetts General Hospital Depression Clinical and Research Program, and Harvard Medical School, Boston; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minn.; the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama-Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to test the efficacy of adjunctive ziprasidone in adults with nonpsychotic unipolar major depression experiencing persistent symptoms after 8 weeks of open-label treatment with escitalopram. METHOD: This was an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial conducted at three academic medical centers. Participants were 139 outpatients with persistent symptoms of major depression after an 8-week open-label trial of escitalopram (phase 1), randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive adjunctive ziprasidone (escitalopram plus ziprasidone, N=71) or adjunctive placebo (escitalopram plus placebo, N=68), with 8 weekly follow-up assessments. The primary outcome measure was clinical response, defined as a reduction of at least 50% in score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). The Hamilton Anxiety Rating scale (HAM-A) and Visual Analog Scale for Pain were defined a priori as key secondary outcome measures. RESULTS:Rates of clinical response (35.2% compared with 20.5%) and mean improvement in HAM-D total scores (-6.4 [SD=6.4] compared with -3.3 [SD=6.2]) were significantly greater for the escitalopram plus ziprasidone group. Several secondary measures of antidepressant efficacy also favored adjunctive ziprasidone. The escitalopram plus ziprasidone group also showed significantly greater improvement on HAM-A score but not on Visual Analog Scale for Pain score. Ten (14%) patients in the escitalopram plus ziprasidone group discontinued treatment because of intolerance, compared with none in the escitalopram plus placebo group. CONCLUSIONS:Ziprasidone as an adjunct to escitalopram demonstrated antidepressant efficacy in adult patients with major depressive disorder experiencing persistent symptoms after 8 weeks of open-label treatment with escitalopram.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to test the efficacy of adjunctive ziprasidone in adults with nonpsychotic unipolar major depression experiencing persistent symptoms after 8 weeks of open-label treatment with escitalopram. METHOD: This was an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial conducted at three academic medical centers. Participants were 139 outpatients with persistent symptoms of major depression after an 8-week open-label trial of escitalopram (phase 1), randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive adjunctive ziprasidone (escitalopram plus ziprasidone, N=71) or adjunctive placebo (escitalopram plus placebo, N=68), with 8 weekly follow-up assessments. The primary outcome measure was clinical response, defined as a reduction of at least 50% in score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). The Hamilton Anxiety Rating scale (HAM-A) and Visual Analog Scale for Pain were defined a priori as key secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Rates of clinical response (35.2% compared with 20.5%) and mean improvement in HAM-D total scores (-6.4 [SD=6.4] compared with -3.3 [SD=6.2]) were significantly greater for the escitalopram plus ziprasidone group. Several secondary measures of antidepressant efficacy also favored adjunctive ziprasidone. The escitalopram plus ziprasidone group also showed significantly greater improvement on HAM-A score but not on Visual Analog Scale for Pain score. Ten (14%) patients in the escitalopram plus ziprasidone group discontinued treatment because of intolerance, compared with none in the escitalopram plus placebo group. CONCLUSIONS:Ziprasidone as an adjunct to escitalopram demonstrated antidepressant efficacy in adult patients with major depressive disorder experiencing persistent symptoms after 8 weeks of open-label treatment with escitalopram.
Authors: George I Papakostas; Timothy J Petersen; Andrew A Nierenberg; Jessica L Murakami; Jonathan E Alpert; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Maurizio Fava Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Robert M Berman; Maurizio Fava; Michael E Thase; Madhukar H Trivedi; René Swanink; Robert D McQuade; William H Carson; David Adson; Leslie Taylor; James Hazel; Ronald N Marcus Journal: CNS Spectr Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.790
Authors: Robert M Berman; Ronald N Marcus; René Swanink; Robert D McQuade; William H Carson; Patricia K Corey-Lisle; Arif Khan Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Hitoshi Sakurai; Christina Dording; Albert Yeung; Simmie Foster; Felipe Jain; Trina Chang; Nhi-Ha Trinh; Richard Bernard; Sean Boyden; Syed Z Iqbal; Samuel T Wilkinson; Sanjay J Mathew; David Mischoulon; Maurizio Fava; Cristina Cusin Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Ricardo P Garay; Carlos A Zarate; Thomas Charpeaud; Leslie Citrome; Christoph U Correll; Ahcène Hameg; Pierre-Michel Llorca Journal: Expert Rev Neurother Date: 2017-01-29 Impact factor: 4.618
Authors: Sidney H Kennedy; Raymond W Lam; Roger S McIntyre; S Valérie Tourjman; Venkat Bhat; Pierre Blier; Mehrul Hasnain; Fabrice Jollant; Anthony J Levitt; Glenda M MacQueen; Shane J McInerney; Diane McIntosh; Roumen V Milev; Daniel J Müller; Sagar V Parikh; Norma L Pearson; Arun V Ravindran; Rudolf Uher Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Dawn F Ionescu; Richard C Shelton; Lee Baer; Kathryn H Meade; Michaela B Swee; Maurizio Fava; George I Papakostas Journal: Int Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 1.659