Literature DB >> 26084780

Prognostic factors in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study from the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Kenichi Harano1, Akihiro Hirakawa2, Mayu Yunokawa3, Toshiaki Nakamura4, Toyomi Satoh5, Tadaaki Nishikawa6, Daisuke Aoki7, Kimihiko Ito8, Kiyoshi Ito9, Toru Nakanishi10, Nobuyuki Susumu7, Kazuhiro Takehara11, Yoh Watanabe12, Hidemichi Watari13, Toshiaki Saito14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uterine carcinosarcomas (UCSs) are rare and aggressive tumors. The prognostic factors are not sufficiently known.
METHODS: We performed a multi-institutional, retrospective study of women with stage I-IV UCS, diagnosed between 2007 and 2012. Data obtained from medical records included demographic, clinicopathological, treatment, and outcome information.
RESULTS: A total of 486 patients (median age 65 years) were identified-224 (46 %) were stage I, 32 (7 %) were stage II, 139 (28 %) were stage III, and 91 (19 %) were stage IV. Among them, 277 (57 %) had disease recurrence. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 16.4 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 15.7-27.2], and median overall survival (OS) was 72.0 months (95 % CI 43.0-not reached). In total, 454 (94 %) patients received adjuvant treatment, and 440 (91 %) received adjuvant chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, stage III-IV disease, CA-125 level, and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) were significantly associated with shorter median DFS. Stage III-IV disease, performance status 2-4, ≥50 % myometrial invasion depth, and postsurgical residual tumor size >1 cm were significantly associated with shorter median OS. Conversely, pelvic lymph node lymphadenectomy was associated with improved DFS and OS.
CONCLUSIONS: Stage, performance status, CA-125 level, LVSI, and myometrial invasion were associated with poor prognoses. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was associated with improved survival, and may be necessary for the surgical management of UCS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lymphadenectomy; Pelvic lymph node; Prognostic factor; Uterine carcinosarcoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26084780     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-015-0859-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  16 in total

1.  The role of cytoreductive surgery for newly diagnosed advanced-stage uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Edward J Tanner; Mario M Leitao; Karuna Garg; Dennis S Chi; Yukio Sonoda; Ginger J Gardner; Richard R Barakat; Elizabeth L Jewell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Serum CA125 predicts extrauterine disease and survival in uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Gloria S Huang; Lydia G Chiu; Juliana S Gebb; Marc J Gunter; Paniti Sukumvanich; Gary L Goldberg; Mark H Einstein
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Mixed müllerian tumours of the uterus--prognostic factors: a clinical and histopathologic study of 147 cases.

Authors:  B Larson; C Silfverswärd; B Nilsson; F Pettersson
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Clinical features and outcomes of uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Amy L Jonson; Robin L Bliss; Alexander Truskinovsky; Patricia Judson; Peter Argenta; Linda Carson; Kathryn Dusenbery; Levi S Downs
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  A gynecologic oncology group randomized phase III trial of whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. cisplatin-ifosfamide and mesna (CIM) as post-surgical therapy in stage I-IV carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus.

Authors:  Aaron H Wolfson; Mark F Brady; Thomas Rocereto; Robert S Mannel; Yi-Chun Lee; Robert J Futoran; David E Cohn; Olga B Ioffe
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  The role of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in surgical management of apparently early carcinosarcoma of uterus.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Uterine carcinosarcomas and grade 3 endometrioid cancers: evidence for distinct tumor behavior.

Authors:  Nisha Bansal; Thomas J Herzog; Venkatraman E Seshan; Peter B Schiff; William M Burke; Carmel J Cohen; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Prognostic factors in early-stage uterine sarcoma. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  F J Major; J A Blessing; S G Silverberg; C P Morrow; W T Creasman; J L Currie; E Yordan; M F Brady
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Malignant mixed Müllerian tumors of the uterus: analysis of patterns of failure, prognostic factors, and treatment outcome.

Authors:  Michael Callister; Lois M Ramondetta; Anuja Jhingran; Thomas W Burke; Patricia J Eifel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Uterine and ovary carcinosarcomas: outcome, prognosis factors, and adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Cécile Pacaut; Aurélie Bourmaud; Romain Rivoirard; Guillaume Moriceau; Jean-Baptiste Guy; Olivier Collard; Claire Bosacki; Jean-Philippe Jacquin; Antonin Levy; Céline Chauleur; Nicolas Magné; Yacine Merrouche
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.339

View more
  11 in total

1.  Lymphadenectomy and Adjuvant Therapy Improve Survival with Uterine Carcinosarcoma: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marco A C Versluis; Cindy Pielsticker; Maaike A van der Aa; Marco de Bruyn; Harry Hollema; Hans W Nijman
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.935

2.  Prognostic factors for disease-free and overall survival of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Yavuz Emre Şükür; Salih Taşkın; Bulut Varlı; Can Ateş; Mete Güngör; Fırat Ortaç
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Review of Recommended Treatment of Uterine Carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Joseph Menczer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-11

Review 4.  Circulating Transcripts and Biomarkers in Uterine Tumors: Is There a Predictive Role?

Authors:  Christine De Bruyn; Thaïs Baert; Thierry Van den Bosch; An Coosemans
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Prognostic value of metabolic parameters determined by preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Hyun Ju Lee; Jong Jin Lee; Jeong Yeol Park; Jong Hyeok Kim; Yong Man Kim; Young Tak Kim; Joo Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Clinicopathologic and Molecular Characteristics of Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma Arising From the Uterine Body.

Authors:  Kiyong Na; Hyun-Soo Kim
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Outcome and Predictive Factors in Uterine Carcinosarcoma Using Postoperative Radiotherapy: A Rare Cancer Network Study.

Authors:  Daniel R Zwahlen; Ulrike Schick; Yasemin Bolukbasi; Juliette Thariat; Roxolyana Abdah-Bortnyak; Abraham Kuten; Sefik Igdem; Hale Caglar; Zeynep Ozsaran; Kristina Loessl; Kaouthar Khanfir Belkaaloul; Sylviane Villette; Hansjörg Vees
Journal:  Rare Tumors       Date:  2016-06-29

8.  Pazopanib as a second line treatment for uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma: a single institutional study.

Authors:  Tadaaki Nishikawa; Kosei Hasegawa; Akira Yabuno; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Masanori Yasuda; Eito Kozawa; Keiichi Fujiwara
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Clinical utility of CA-125 in the management of uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Malcolm S Ross; Mayu Yunokawa; Marian S Johnson; Hiroko Machida; Kohei Omatsu; Merieme M Klobocista; Dwight D Im; Shinya Satoh; Tsukasa Baba; Yuji Ikeda; Stephen H Bush; Kosei Hasegawa; Erin A Blake; Munetaka Takekuma; Masako Shida; Masato Nishimura; Sosuke Adachi; Tanja Pejovic; Satoshi Takeuchi; Takuhei Yokoyama; Yutaka Ueda; Keita Iwasaki; Takahito M Miyake; Shiori Yanai; Tadayoshi Nagano; Tadao Takano; Mian Mk Shahzad; Frederick R Ueland; Joseph L Kelley; Lynda D Roman
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  OSucs: An Online Prognostic Biomarker Analysis Tool for Uterine Carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Yang An; Qiang Wang; Fengjie Sun; Guosen Zhang; Fengling Wang; Lu Zhang; Yanan Li; Weinan Ren; Wan Zhu; Yongqiang Li; Shaoping Ji; Xiangqian Guo
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.