Literature DB >> 18591309

Uterine carcinosarcomas and grade 3 endometrioid cancers: evidence for distinct tumor behavior.

Nisha Bansal1, Thomas J Herzog, Venkatraman E Seshan, Peter B Schiff, William M Burke, Carmel J Cohen, Jason D Wright.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical behavior and outcome of uterine carcinosarcomas and grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas.
METHODS: Data on patients with grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinomas and uterine carcinosarcomas, from 1988 to 2004, was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Mortality was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test.
RESULTS: The cohort included 8,986 women with 5,024 (56%) grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas and 3,962 (44%) uterine carcinosarcomas. Women with uterine carcinosarcomas were older (aged 70 years compared with 66 years; P<.001) and more often nonwhite (23% compared with 15%; P<.001). These women presented with more advanced disease (stage III/IV 41% compared with 31%; P<.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that uterine carcinosarcoma histology, advanced age, nonwhite race, and advanced stage were independent predictors of poor survival. Cancer-specific mortality was 45% lower in women with grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas (hazard ratio 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-0.6). The 5-year cancer-specific survival was lower for women with uterine carcinosarcoma for each disease stage. Survival for stage IC was 38% (95% CI 33-45%) for uterine carcinosarcoma compared with 68% (95% CI 63-73%) for grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma. For stage III, survival was 22% (95% CI 19-26%) for uterine carcinosarcoma compared with 45% (95% CI 41-49%) for grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma.
CONCLUSION: Carcinosarcomas present at more advanced stage and have worse survival than grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas. Carcinosarcomas may represent a distinct biologic entity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18591309     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318176157c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  30 in total

1.  Patterns of care, predictors, and outcomes of chemotherapy in elderly women with early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Gunjal Garg; Cecilia Yee; Kendra Schwartz; David G Mutch; Robert T Morris; Matthew A Powell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Molecular and clinicopathological analyses of esophageal carcinosarcoma with special reference to morphological change.

Authors:  Sho Tsuyama; Tsuyoshi Saito; Yoichi Akazawa; Yuka Yanai; Noboru Yatagai; Keisuke Akaike; Takuo Hayashi; Yoshiyuki Suehara; Fumiyuki Takahashi; Kazuya Takamochi; Takashi Hashimoto; Yoshiaki Kajiyama; Masahiko Tsurumaru; Tetsu Fukunaga; Takashi Yao
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Long-term recurrence-free survival in a patient with stage IVB uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Gun Yoon; Yong-Seok Kim; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Jeong-Won Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 4.  Coexistence of homologous-type cervical carcinosarcoma with endometrioid-type G1 endometrial cancer: a case report with an immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  Andrzej Semczuk; Eva Colas; Beata Walczyna; Maciej Joźwik; Andrzej Pyra; Anna Semczuk-Sikora; Tomasz Rechberger
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-09-15

5.  Prognostic factors for disease-free and overall survival of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Yavuz Emre Şükür; Salih Taşkın; Bulut Varlı; Can Ateş; Mete Güngör; Fırat Ortaç
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Prognostic factors impacting survival in early stage uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Katherine C Kurnit; Rebecca A Previs; Pamela T Soliman; Shannon N Westin; Ann H Klopp; Bryan M Fellman; Karen H Lu; Lois M Ramondetta; Nicole D Fleming
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Comparison of survival outcomes between patients with malignant mixed mullerian tumors and high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, and papillary serous endometrial cancers.

Authors:  Ashley Sinclair Felix; Roslyn A Stone; Robert Bowser; Mamatha Chivukula; Robert P Edwards; Joel L Weissfeld; Faina Linkov
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.437

8.  Establishment and characterization of a novel uterine carcinosarcoma cell line, TU-ECS-1, with mutations of TP53 and KRAS.

Authors:  Yohei Chiba; Seiya Sato; Hiroaki Itamochi; Yasuko Suga; Tomoyuki Fukagawa; Nao Oumi; Tetsuro Oishi; Tasuku Harada; Tamotsu Sugai; Toru Sugiyama
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 4.174

9.  [Uterine sarcoma treatment].

Authors:  G Köhler
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.011

10.  Primary retroperitoneal carcinosarcoma in a child: a case report.

Authors:  Feng Xu; Yangqing Huang; Jiamei Yang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.