| Literature DB >> 26082180 |
Alba Cortés1, Carla Muñoz-Antoli2, Carla Martín-Grau3, J Guillermo Esteban4, Richard K Grencis5, Rafael Toledo6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The intestinal epithelium plays a multifactorial role in mucosal defense. In this sense, augmented epithelial cell turnover appears as a potential effector mechanism for the rejection of intestinal-dwelling helminths.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26082180 PMCID: PMC4482164 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-015-0948-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Echinostoma caproni worm recovery from infected mice and rats intraperitoneally injected with BrdU at different weeks post infection (wpi)
| Host | wpi | Worm recovery (mean ± sd) | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mouse | 2 | 37.6 ± 4.2 | 31–46 |
| 4 | 37.2 ± 10.5 | 28–50 | |
| 6 | 36,4 ± 9,6 | 21–50 | |
| Rat | 2 | 27.4 ± 10.8 | 16–44 |
| 4 | 11.7 ± 4.5 | 7–16 |
sd standard deviation
Fig. 1a Immunohistochemistry anti-BrdU on small intestine tissue sections from control and infected mice and rats 1 h after BrdU intraperitoneal administration (wpi: week post infection). Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue) and BrdU-positive nuclei are pink. Scale bar: 10 μm. b Number of cells per crypt of Lieberkühn and c percentage of BrdU-labeled cells per crypt 1 h after BrdU administration in mice (white bars) and rats (black bars) at different wpi. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks indicate significant differences with respect to uninfected controls (0 wpi) for each host species (*p < 0.001). Horizontal bars indicate differences between infected animals at different wpi (a: p < 0.05)
Fig. 2Positional distribution of BrdU-labeled cells in mice (a) and rats (b) at different weeks post Echinostoma caproni infection (wpi). Sections from animals killed 1 h after intraperitoneal injection were scored (50 crypts per animal, 5 animals per group) to determine the percentage of labeled cells at each position (mean ± standard deviation). Asterisks indicate significant differences with respect to uninfected controls (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 3Cell position occupied by the foremost migrating BrdU-labeled cell in the crypt-villus axis in mice (a) and rats (b) after 1 h (grey bars) and 24 h (white/black bars in A and B, respectively) since the BrdU injection. Asterisks indicate significant differences with respect to uninfected controls (*p < 0.0001) for each time after BrdU administration. Horizontal bars indicate differences between infected animals at different wpi (a: p < 0.05). c The intestinal epithelial cell migration rate was assessed with a position-based analysis and expressed as the number of cell positions moved per 23 h. Mice, white bars; rats, black bars
Fig. 4Crypt depth, villi length and villus/crypt ratio in the site of infectionwith Echinostoma caproni in mice (a) and rats (b) at different weeks post infection (wpi). c Number of BrdU-labeled cells accumulated per villus/crypt unit (VCU) 24 h after BrdU administration in the intestine of mice (white bars) and rats (black bars) at different wpi. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks indicate significant differences with respect to uninfected controls (0 wpi) for each host species (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.0001). Horizontal bars indicate differences between infected animals at different wpi (a: p < 0.05; b: p < 0.05)