Literature DB >> 26082028

Validating administrative records in post-traumatic stress disorder.

Thad E Abrams1,2, Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin1,2, Terence M Keane3,4, Kelly Richardson1.   

Abstract

There is insufficient data on the accuracy of administrative coding data (ACD) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Medical records were reviewed for (1) a diagnosis of PTSD; (2) treatment for PTSD. The records were compared against the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) data in order to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of three commonly used approaches. The PPV and NPV varied according to the ACD approach. Relative to a medical records review, the ACD approach of one or two PTSD coded outpatient encounters had a PPV of 78% and an NPV of 91%; whereas the PPV was 97% and the NPV was 98% for three or more PTSD codes. For pharmacotherapy, the ACD approach with one or two codes for PTSD had a PPV of 33% (NPV = 93%), whereas three or more PTSD coded encounters improved the PPV to 85% (NPV = 100%). When using VHA data, we recommend tailoring the identification strategy according to the research aims. An ACD approach identifying one or more PTSD outpatient encounters should be considered sufficient for a diagnosis of PTSD. Assessments for PTSD associated pharmacotherapy require using an ACD approach that identifies veterans with the presence ≥ 3 outpatient PTSD encounters. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PTSD; methodology; trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26082028      PMCID: PMC6877113          DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.035


  17 in total

1.  Validation of comorbid conditions on the end-stage renal disease medical evidence report: the CHOICE study. Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for ESRD.

Authors:  J Craig Longenecker; Josef Coresh; Michael J Klag; Andrew S Levey; Alice A Martin; Nancy E Fink; Neil R Powe
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Recent trends In VA treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental disorders.

Authors:  Robert A Rosenheck; Alan F Fontana
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Validity of PTSD diagnoses in VA administrative data: comparison of VA administrative PTSD diagnoses to self-reported PTSD Checklist scores.

Authors:  Amy A Gravely; Andrea Cutting; Sean Nugent; Joseph Grill; Kathleen Carlson; Michele Spoont
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2011

4.  VA mental health services utilization in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans in the first year of receiving new mental health diagnoses.

Authors:  Karen H Seal; Shira Maguen; Beth Cohen; Kristian S Gima; Thomas J Metzler; Li Ren; Daniel Bertenthal; Charles R Marmar
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2010-02

5.  Validating administrative records in post-traumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Thad E Abrams; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; Terence M Keane; Kelly Richardson
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.035

6.  Prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder in Veterans Affairs primary care clinics.

Authors:  Kathryn M Magruder; B Christopher Frueh; Rebecca G Knapp; Lori Davis; Mark B Hamner; Renée Hebert Martin; Paul B Gold; George W Arana
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.238

7.  Pharmacotherapy of PTSD in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs: diagnostic- and symptom-guided drug selection.

Authors:  Somaia Mohamed; Robert A Rosenheck
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  Performance characteristics of the posttraumatic stress disorder checklist and SPAN in Veterans Affairs primary care settings.

Authors:  Derik E Yeager; Kathryn M Magruder; Rebecca G Knapp; Joyce S Nicholas; B Christopher Frueh
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.238

9.  Validation of a case definition to define hypertension using administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Nadia Khan; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Karen Tu; Guanmin Chen; Norm Campbell; Michael D Hill; William A Ghali; Finlay A McAlister
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey.

Authors:  R C Kessler; A Sonnega; E Bromet; M Hughes; C B Nelson
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1995-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Validating administrative records in post-traumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Thad E Abrams; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; Terence M Keane; Kelly Richardson
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Impact of psychiatric illness on decreased survival in elderly patients with bladder cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Usama Jazzar; Shan Yong; Zachary Klaassen; Jinhai Huo; Byron D Hughes; Edgar Esparza; Hemalkumar B Mehta; Simon P Kim; Douglas S Tyler; Stephen J Freedland; Ashish M Kamat; Dwight V Wolf; Stephen B Williams
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Validation of an Electronic Medical Record-Based Algorithm for Identifying Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in U.S. Veterans.

Authors:  Kelly M Harrington; Rachel Quaden; Murray B Stein; Jacqueline P Honerlaw; Shadha Cissell; Robert H Pietrzak; Hongyu Zhao; Krishnan Radhakrishnan; Mihaela Aslan; John Michael Gaziano; John Concato; David R Gagnon; Joel Gelernter; Kelly Cho
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2019-04

4.  Medical and Social Factors Associated With Referral for Elder Abuse Services in a National Health Care System.

Authors:  Lena K Makaroun; Carolyn T Thorpe; Maria K Mor; Hongwei Zhang; Elijah Lovelace; Tony Rosen; Melissa E Dichter; Ann-Marie Rosland
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 6.591

5.  Positive Predictive Value of COVID-19 ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes Across Calendar Time and Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Kristine E Lynch; Benjamin Viernes; Elise Gatsby; Scott L DuVall; Barbara E Jones; Tamára L Box; Craig Kreisler; Makoto Jones
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.790

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.