| Literature DB >> 26081429 |
Mrinal Joel1,2,3,4, Awais A Mughal5, Zanina Grieg6,7, Wayne Murrell8, Sheryl Palmero9, Birthe Mikkelsen10, Hege B Fjerdingstad11,12, Cecilie J Sandberg13, Jinan Behnan14, Joel C Glover15,16,17, Iver A Langmoen18,19,20, Biljana Stangeland21,22.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glioblastomas are invasive therapy resistant brain tumors with extremely poor prognosis. The Glioma initiating cell (GIC) population contributes to therapeutic resistance and tumor recurrence. Targeting GIC-associated gene candidates could significantly impact GBM tumorigenicity. Here, we investigate a protein kinase, PBK/TOPK as a candidate for regulating growth, survival and in vivo tumorigenicity of GICs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26081429 PMCID: PMC4470057 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-015-0398-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cancer ISSN: 1476-4598 Impact factor: 27.401
Fig. 1Expression of PBK in different GIC cultures. a Expression of PBK gene in NFCs and seven different GIC cultures. Box plot shows significantly increased expression levels of PBK in GIC cultures. Relative expression of PBK was calculated using normal NSCs from the adult human brain as a reference (Relative expression of PBK in NSCs = 1, not shown). Relative expression of PBK was not significantly increased in NFCs (p = 0.057). b Expression of PBK gene in GBM tissue samples from TCGA. PBK was significantly up-regulated in proneural and down-regulated in mesenchymal subtypes of GBM. PBK expression in different subtypes was performed using the classical subtype as a reference. Common for A and B: The bottom and top of each box in box and whisker plots indicate the 25th and 75th percentile (the lower and upper quartiles, respectively), and the band near the middle of the box represents the 50th percentile (the median) (c-h) Immunostaining of cryosections of GIC spheres (T65 and T08) shows expression of PBK (red) and its cellular co-localization with Hoechst (blue). Scale bar = 20 μm. i, j Immunolabeling of a GBM tissue with PBK antibody shows its extensive presence in the GBM tissue compared to the normal cortex brain tissue. Scale bar = 20 μm. k Western blot analysis done on seven GIC cultures shows a clear upregulation of PBK as compared to that in the two normal NSC cultures. ACTB was used as a control. l Kaplan-Meier graph showing patient survival in mesenchymal subtype of GBM (TCGA). The survival times of GBM patients with highest (30 %) and lowest (30 %) expression of PBK were compared (p = 0.0046 according to Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test). Increased expression of PBK correlated negatively with patient survival. Asterisks correspond to p values and indicate level of significance: * = (p ≈ 0.01-0.05), ** = (p ≈ 0.001-0.01) and **** = (p < 0.0001)
Fig. 2PBK knockdown with lentiviral shRNAs led to reduction in viability and sphere forming capacity in GICs. a Western blot analyses demonstrated down-regulation of PBK protein level in T65, T08 and T59 shRNAs 1, 2 and 3 cell lines compared to non-silencing cells and the original tumor. ACTB was used as a control. b Immunofluorescence analysis of cryosections of GIC spheres transduced with shRNA 2 and 3 compared to the control, shows the loss of PBK protein in the cells present in the spheres. This loss of PBK directly correlated to the loss of GFP. Scale bar = 20 μm. c Quantitative analyses of PBK knockdown cell lines of different GICs showed a significant decrease (n = 5 in each assessment) in viability of knockdown cells compared to the non-silencing controls. d, e Analysis of sphere formation capacity - Sphere numbers and sphere areas of the PBK knockdown cell lines were also diminished as compared to the non-silencing controls. PBK knockdown led to an efficient decrease in the sphere formation capacity of GICs. Error bars = SD; n = 5. Asterisks correspond to p values and indicate level of significance: * = (p ≈ 0.01-0.05), ** = (p ≈ 0.001-0.01) and **** = (p < 0.0001)
Fig. 3Pharmacological treatment of GICs with HI-TOPK-032 depleted PBK, and reduced their viability and sphere forming capacity. a HI-TOPK-032 treated cells exhibited significant decrease in viability. b, c Sphere formation capacity - Sphere number and sphere area of the PBK treated cells were also evaluated as compared to the untreated cells. PBK inhibition led to an efficient decrease in the sphere formation capacity of GICs. d Induction of cell death in HI-TOPK-032 treated cells as compared to untreated ones was significant in all cases (e) Western blot showing Total and Phospho ERK in two GIC cultures treated with HI-TOPK-032 versus untreated cultures. f Western blot showing phosphorylation status of the p38 MAP kinase (Thr180/Tyr182) in three GIC cultures treated with HI-TOPK-032 versus untreated cultures. The relative expression values were calculated by normalization to ACTB expression and using untreated cultures as references. Error bars = SD; n = 5. Asterisks correspond to p values and indicate level of significance: * = (p ≈ 0.01-0.05), ** = (p ≈ 0.001-0.01) and **** = (p < 0.0001)
Fig. 4Anti-tumor effects in tumor xenografts upon inhibition of PBK through administration of HI-TOPK-032. a T08 tumor cells were subcutaneously transplanted in the right flank of SCID mice. After establishment of tumors, mice were treated three times weekly by intra-tumoral injection of (i) control and (ii) HI-TOPK-032 (5 and 10 mg/kg) suspensions. The tumors were extracted after 4 weeks of treatment and a representative tumor from each group is shown. b Mean tumor volume was calculated. Error bars = SD. Mean tumor volumes of HI-TOPK-032 treated tumors (5 and 10 mg/kg) were significantly different than the control group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.005 respectively). c HI-TOPK-032 had no effect on mouse body weight. Mice in both treated and untreated groups were weighed once a week. Error bars = SD (d, e). Immunofluorescence analysis of HI-TOPK-032 (10 mg/kg) treated and control tumor cryosections stained for Ki-67 and cleaved caspase-3 expression. Scale bar = 20 μm
Fig. 5Effects on patient cells: In vitro simulation of treatment with inhibitor. Net live cells expressed as fold of cell numbers for cultures with vehicle only. HI-TOPK-032 was included in cultures at various concentrations. There was a trend of dose dependent reduction with concentration in all cultures (2-Way Anova: p = 0.0031; A, n = 22; B, n = 18; C, n = 6; D, n = 3; E, n = 3. Bar: + SEM). At an inhibitor concentration of 3.5 μM decreases in cell numbers were significant in GIC cultures (c-d) but not in NSC cultures (a) thus presenting a narrow therapeutic window (indicated with red rectangles). Using individual T-tests to compare dose concentrations, normal NSCs (a), normal differentiated cells (b) and tumor differentiated cells (e) were not significantly reduced at 3.5 μM when compared to 0 μM). At an inhibitor concentration of 3.5 μM both groups of tumor stem cells experienced a significant reduction in net live cells. However, at an inhibitor concentration of 5 μM decreases in cell numbers were significant in differentiated GIC cultures (e) but not in differentiated NSC cultures (b) thus presenting a narrow therapeutic window (indicated with red rectangle)