Literature DB >> 26081045

Somatic alteration and depleted nuclear expression of BAP1 in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Takahiro Mori1, Makiko Sumii1, Fumiyoshi Fujishima2, Kazuko Ueno3, Mitsuru Emi4, Masao Nagasaki3, Chikashi Ishioka5, Natsuko Chiba6.   

Abstract

BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) is a deubiquitinating enzyme that is involved in the regulation of cell growth. Recently, many somatic and germline mutations of BAP1 have been reported in a broad spectrum of tumors. In this study, we identified a novel somatic non-synonymous BAP1 mutation, a phenylalanine-to-isoleucine substitution at codon 170 (F170I), in 1 of 49 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) of BAP1 gene in this ESCC tumor disclosed monoallelic deletion (LOH), suggesting BAP1 alterations on both alleles in this tumor. The deubiquitinase activity and the auto-deubiquitinase activity of F170I-mutant BAP1 were markedly suppressed compared with wild-type BAP1. In addition, wild-type BAP1 mostly localizes to the nucleus, whereas the F170I mutant preferentially localized in the cytoplasm. Microarray analysis revealed that expression of the F170I mutant drastically altered gene expression profiles compared with expressed wild-type BAP1. Gene-ontology analyses indicated that the F170I mutation altered the expression of genes involved in oncogenic pathways. We found that one candidate, TCEAL7, previously reported as a putative tumor suppressor gene, was significantly induced by wild-type BAP1 as compared to F170I mutant BAP1. Furthermore, we found that the level of BAP1 expression in the nucleus was reduced in 44% of ESCC examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Because the nuclear localization of BAP1 is important for its tumor suppressor function, BAP1 may be functionally inactivated in a substantial portion of ESCC. Taken together, BAP1 is likely to function as a tumor suppressor in at least a part of ESCC.
© 2015 The Authors. Cancer Science published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BAP1; deubiquitinase; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; gene expression profiling; somatic mutation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26081045      PMCID: PMC4582980          DOI: 10.1111/cas.12722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Sci        ISSN: 1347-9032            Impact factor:   6.716


BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) was identified as a protein that binds to the amino-terminal RING domain of BRCA1.1 It is a nuclear deuibiquinating enzyme with ubiquitin carboxyl hydrolase (UCH) activity that regulates cell growth in a UCH-dependent but BRCA1-independent manner.2 BAP1 contains two nuclear localization signals; nuclear localization is required for its tumor suppressor function.3–5 BAP1 is frequently mutated in metastasizing uveal melanomas as well as in malignant pleural mesothelioma, renal cell carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.6–11 Furthermore, a number of germline BAP1 mutations have been reported to predispose to susceptibility to several tumors: the so-called BAP1 cancer syndrome.12–18 This suggests that BAP1 mutation can occur in various types of cancers, including as yet unreported malignant diseases. We previously reported that chromosome 3p21, where BAP1 is located, is frequently deleted in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), although BAP1 mutation had not been reported in this type of cancer.19,20 In addition, we applied MLPA analysis to explore copy number alteration at the BAP1 locus. Here, we sought to clarify whether genetic alterations in BAP1 are found in ESCC and play an important role in esophageal carcinogenesis.

Materials and Methods

Patients

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine (numbers: 2013-1-70, 2013-1-116) and all patients enrolled in this study gave written informed consent for genome analysis, except those who had undergone esophagectomy before 2001, when the Japanese Government officially announced guidelines for human genome analysis. Genomic study was approved for the above cases only under the condition of unlinked anonymity. Forty-nine patients were enrolled in this genome-analysis study. Genomic DNA was extracted from frozen tissues in 48 patients and from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) normal and cancerous tissues in 1 patient; all of 49 tumors were pathologically diagnosed as ESCC (Table1). Genomic DNA extracted from frozen normal epithelia and tumor tissues from 27 patients and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from 52 patients were used for copy number variation (CNV) analysis and IHC analysis, respectively.
Table 1

Clinical and pathological data of patients of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in this study

Case numberSexAge at treatmentMaterialStage (TNM)Prognosis (Ms, months)CNV at BAP1 in tumorBAP1 somatic mutationNuclear BAP1 (IHC)
TUH-20M59FFPET3N1M02Ms, died from cancerNENENegative*
TUH-22F72FFPET2N0M071.3Ms, survivesNENENegative
TUH-25M59FFPET3N1M08.5Ms, died from cancerNENEPositive
TUH-30M37FFPET3N1M021.2Ms, died from cancerNENENegative*
TUH-31M69FFPET2N1M067.3Ms, survivesNENENegative*
TUH-34F61FFPET1N1M09.1Ms, died from cancerNENENegative
CI-103M59Frozen tissuesNANANENoNE
CI-107M33Frozen tissuesNANAex11–17 lossNoNE
CI-108M70Frozen tissuesNANANENoNE
CI-109F64Frozen tissuesNANANENoNE
CI-110F61Frozen tissuesNANANENoNE
CI-111M60Frozen tissuesNANAex1–6, ex12–17 lossNoNE
CI-112M57Frozen tissuesNANAex1, 4, 5, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17 lossNoNE
CI-113M67Frozen tissuesNANANo CNVNoNE
CI-114M57Frozen tissuesNANAex1, 5, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17 lossNoNE
CI-116M55Frozen tissuesNANANENoNE
CI-117M66Frozen tissuesNANANENoNE
CI-118M54Frozen tissuesNANANENoNE
CI-119M55Frozen tissuesNANANENoNE
CI-120M61Frozen tissuesNANAex1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17 lossNoNE
CI-122M45Frozen tissuesNANANENoNE
CI-123M70Frozen tissuesNANAex1-17 lossNoNE
CI-124M76Frozen tissuesNANANo CNVNoNE
CI-125M63Frozen tissuesNANAex1–17 lossF170INE
CI-126NANAFrozen tissuesNANANo CNVNoNE
CI-128M67Frozen tissuesNANANo CNVNoNE
TU-204M66Frozen tissuesT4N1M116.4Ms, died from cancerNENoNE
TU-205M60Frozen tissuesT3N1M016.1Ms, died from cancerNENoNE
TU-206M75Frozen tissuesT4N1M018.4Ms, died from cancerNENoPositive
TU-207M69Frozen tissuesT3N1M05.3Ms, died from cancerNENoNE
TU-209M74Frozen tissuesT2N1M090.7Ms, died from pneumoniaNENoNE
TU-210M67Frozen tissuesT1N1M18.3Ms, died from cancerex1–17 lossNoNegative
TU-211M59Frozen tissuesT4N0M057.7Ms, died from cancerNo CNVNoPositive
TU-212M62Frozen tissuesT4N1M03.2Ms, died from cancerNENoNE
TU-214M66Frozen tissuesT3N1M16.6Ms, died from cancerex1 lossNoPositive
TU-215M75Frozen tissuesT3N0M08.8Ms, died from cancerNENoNegative*
TU-217M65Frozen tissuesT3N1M0144.7Ms, survivesNENoNegative
TU-218M58Frozen tissuesT4N1M09.5Ms, died from cancerNo CNVNoPositive
TU-219M54Frozen tissuesNANANENoNE
TU-220M64Frozen tissuesT3N1M0108.6Ms, died from other cancerex1–17 lossNoPositive
TU-221F56Frozen tissuesT3N1M015.9Ms, died from AMINo CNVNoPositive
TU-222M67Frozen tissuesT4N1M0153.2Ms, survivesNo CNVNoPositive
TU-223M89Frozen tissuesT3N1M021.2Ms, died from pneumoniaNENoNegative
TU-224M66Frozen tissuesT2N0M0139.4Ms, survivesex1 lossNoNegative
TU-225M77Frozen tissuesT2N1M03.4Ms, died from MOFNENoNegative
TU-227M74Frozen tissuesT2N1M037.1Ms, died from cancerNo CNVNoNegative
TU-228M75Frozen tissuesT3N1M116.0Ms, died from cancerNo CNVNoNegative
TU-229M46Frozen tissuesT4N1M011.1Ms, died from cancerNo CNVNoPositive
TU-230M76Frozen tissuesT1N0M0138.7Ms, survivesex1–17 lossNoNegative
TU-231M67Frozen tissuesT2N1M15.4Ms, died from cancerex4–17 lossNoNegative
TU-232F74Frozen tissuesT3N0M07.5Ms, died from cancerNo CNVNoPositive
TU-233NANAFrozen tissuesNANAex1–16 lossNoNE
TU-234M76Frozen tissuesT4N1M0127.2Ms, died from other cancerNo CNVNoPositive
TU-235M71Frozen tissuesT1N0M062.8Ms, died from pneumoniaNENoNE
ST-010M77WhiteBlood cells and FFPET1N0M0127.5Ms, survivesNENEPositive
ST-033M53White Blood cells and FFPET3N1M082.8Ms, died from MLNENEPositive
ST-041M67WhiteBlood cells and FFPET2N1M098.4Ms, survivesNENENegative
ST-049M74White Blood cells and FFPET1N0M075.2Ms, died from cancerNENEPositive
ST-050M54WhiteBlood cells and FFPET2N0M058.7Ms, survivesNENEPositive
ST-051M63White Blood cells and FFPET1N0M0107.2Ms, survivesNENoNegative*
ST-075M59White blood cells and FFPET3N1M010.5Ms, died from cancerNENENegative
ST-094M67White blood cells and FFPET3N1M1b8.1Ms, died from cancerNENEPositive
ST-116M69White blood cells and FFPET3N1M034.3Ms, died from cancerNENENegative*
ST-123M71White blood cells and FFPET3N1M034.8Ms, survivesNENEPositive
ST-145M65White blood cells and FFPET1N1M0102.3Ms, survivesNENEPositive
ST-156M65White blood cells and FFPET3N1M035.3Ms, survivesNENEPositive
ST-163M56White blood cells and FFPET3N1M021.3Ms, died from cancerNENENegative
ST-166M59White blood cells and FFPET3N0M014Ms, survivesNENEPositive
ST-169M62White blood cells and FFPET2N1M01.6Ms, died from AMINENEPositive
ST-176M58White blood cells and FFPET3N1M0103.8Ms, survivesNENENegative*
ST-180M67White blood cells and FFPET3N1M041.7Ms, survivesNENEPositive
ST-196F63White blood cells and FFPET3N0M059.0Ms, survivesNENEPositive
ST-213M65White blood cells and FFPET3N1M096.0Ms, survivesNENENegative
ST-219M60White blood cells and FFPET3N0M049.1Ms, died from cancerNENEPositive
TM109M60FFPET3N1M08.8Ms, died from cancerNENEPositive
TM113M55FFPET3N1M0Survives with recurrenceNENEPositive
TM115F48FFPET2N1M04.9Ms, died from cancerNENEPositive
TM130F44FFPET4N1M013.0Ms, died from cancerNENEPositive
TM131M59FFPET4N1M0SurvivesNENENegative*
TM133M68FFPET3N1M06.2Ms, died from cancerNENEPositive

CNV, copy number variation; NA, not available; NE, not examined. The asterisks after IHC-negative indicate cases with cytosolic strong positiveness.

Clinical and pathological data of patients of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in this study CNV, copy number variation; NA, not available; NE, not examined. The asterisks after IHC-negative indicate cases with cytosolic strong positiveness.

DNA sequencing

We sequenced all exons as well as flanking 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions of BAP1 in genomic DNA from 48 surgically resected ESCC and corresponding normal tissues, which were extracted from frozen tissues, by Sanger sequencing. Later, an additional case, diagnosed as BAP1 negative by IHC, was sequenced using DNA extracted from FFPE tissues as described above. Clinical and pathological data of all samples used in this study are summarized in Table1. PCR primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Cell line and transfection

HEK-293T cells and U2OS cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. Cells were transfected with plasmids using Lipofectamine LTX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

MLPA analysis

MLPA analysis of genomic DNA for each exon of BAP1 gene was carried out using SALSA MLPA BAP1 kit P417-B1-1011 BAP1-v03; probe data are described in SALSA MLPA probemix P417-B1 BAP1 (MRC Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Data analysis was performed following the manufacturer's instruction. The peak areas achieved using BAP1 specific probes in each sample were first normalized by the average of peak areas achieved by control probes specific for locations from other chromosomes. A corresponding calculation was performed for genomic DNA isolated from peripheral blood of normal individuals. We regarded the average value from the normal control DNA as diploid. A final ratio was then calculated by dividing the value from the patient samples by the average value from the control DNA. If this ratio was below 0.7 (log2 ratio below −0.52), the sample was scored to have loss of one copy number (monoallelic loss); if this ratio was below 0.25 (log2 ratio below −2), the sample was scored to have loss of two-copy numbers (biallelic loss). In addition, a negative sample (water) was included in each run.

Plasmid construction

For pCY4B-FLAG-BAP1, the BAP1 sequence was amplified from the cDNA of HEK-293Tcells generated using a Transcriptor High-Fidelity cDNA Synthesis kit (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany). The amplified PCR products were subcloned into pCY4B-FLAG.21 pCY4B-FLAG-BAP1-F170I was generated by site-directed mutagenesis to create the amino acid substitution phenylalanine to isoleucine at codon 170. For pCY4B-HA-HCF1-1-380, the HCF1 sequence was amplified from the cDNA of HEK-293T cells as described above, and was subcloned into pCY4B-HA. pCMV-Myc-ubiquitin has been described previously.22 All constructs were verified by Sanger sequencing. PCR primers as listed below were used for plasmid constructions: BAP1-Xho-F; 5′- GACTCGAGATGAATAAGGGCTGGCTGGAGCTGGAG-3′ BAP1-Not-R; 5′- TCATGCGGCCGCACTGGCGCTTGGCCTTGTAGGGGCGA-3′ HCF1-Xho-F; 5′- TACTCGAGATGGCTTCGGCCGTGTCGCCCGCCAACTT-3′ HCF1-Not-R; 5′- TCATGCGGCCGCACAGGGAGTTGGTGTTGGCGCGTACCAG-3′.

In vivo ubiquitination assays

An in vivo ubiquitination assay was performed as described previously.23 HEK-293T cells were transfected with the vectors described above, and 2 days after transfection, cells were lysed in boiling buffer (1% SDS in PBS). After heating the lysate for 5 min at 100°C and sonicating to shear the DNA, immunoprecipitations (IP) were performed in 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% SDS, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 0.5% BSA, 1 mM EDTA in PBS containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) using anti-HA (HA.11 Monoclonal Antibody #MMS-101R; Covance, Princeton, NJ, USA) or anti-BAP1 antibody (sc-28383, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA) and Protein G Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). Reaction mixtures were incubated at 4°C for 16 h and protein beads were washed twice with the same buffer and twice with 10-fold diluted PBS. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted using anti-Myc (9E10 sc-40, Santa Cruz), anti-FLAG (monoclonal anti-FLAG M2 antibody, Sigma), anti-HA (anti-HA high affinity#1867423, Roche Applied Science) and anti-BAP1 antibodies. Experiments were independently repeated in triplicate and ubiqitination level was quantified by Image Quant TL (GE Healthcare).

Immunocytochemistry

U2OS cells were transfected with pCY4B-FLAG-BAP1-Wt or -F170I, and fixed for 10 min in PBS-buffered 3% paraformaldehyde and 2% sucrose solution, followed by a 5-min permeabilization on ice in Triton buffer (0.5% Triton X-100 in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 50 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl and 300 mM sucrose). After blocking by PBS containing 3% skimmed milk, cells were incubated with anti-FLAG antibody in PBS 1% BSA for 4 h. After washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T), cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) in PBS 1% BSA for 30 min. Cells were washed with PBS-T and mounted in mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA).

Microarray analysis and gene ontology analysis

HEK-293T cells were transiently transfected either with pCY4B-FLAG-BAP1-Wt or -F170I. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were collected and total RNA were extracted using ISOGEN (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan). A Whole Human Genome Microarray Kit, 4 × 44K (#G4112F, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was hybridized with total cDNA generated from total RNA using a Low Input Quick-Amp Labeling Kit (Agilent) and the signals were analyzed. Each experiment with wild-type BAP1 or F170I mutant was conducted twice. The microarray data were extracted using the GeneSpring version 12.5 (Agilent). The raw data were normalized using quantile normalization and used for heat-map analysis and principal component analysis. Genes were selected by the values of the first component of the vector in principal component analysis, more than 1.428 or less than −1.907, because APOL6 (1.428) and HSPA6 (–1.907) were 1.5-fold differentially expressed between wild-type BAP1 and the F170I mutant, according to the ratio of averaged expression values in heat-map analysis of two independent F170I mutant and wild-type BAP1 transfections. Then, genes without genome annotation were excluded from the study. The 5840 genes ultimately selected were used for gene ontology analyses by Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) (http://www.ingenuity.com; Tomy Digital Biology, Tokyo, Japan), DAVID KEGG, DAVID Biocarts and DAVID Reactome (DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.7; http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov).

Immunohistochemical staining and pathological evaluation

Surgical specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and representative sections were embedded in paraffin wax. Serial 4-μm-thick sections from the most representative area of each specimen were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and then immersed in 3.0% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 10 min at room temperature (RT) to block endogenous peroxidase activity. For antigen retrieval, the slides were heated for 5 min in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0) using an autoclave at 121°C. The slides were incubated in 1% normal rabbit serum for 30 min at RT to reduce non-specific antibody binding. Subsequently, the slides were incubated at 41°C overnight with anti-BAP1 antibody (sc-28383, Santa Cruz, diluted 1/100). The next day, the sections were incubated with biotinylated anti-mouse secondary antibody (Nichirei Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan), then incubated with peroxidase-labeled streptavidin (Nichirei Biosciences) for 30 min at RT. The antigen–antibody complexes were visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine, and the slides were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and cleared in xylene. The staining and pathological findings were evaluated independently by two of the authors (T.M. and F.F.) who were blinded to the patients' clinical data. Tumors were scored as positive or negative depending on whether or not their nuclei stained with BAP1.14,24

Real-time reverse transcription PCR of TCEAL7

To determine the RNA expression level of TCEAL7 gene, we performed a real time RT-PCR assay; in brief, cDNA created with an iScript Advanced cDNA Synthesis Kit for RT-qPCR (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) using total RNA extracted from HEK-293T cells transfected with wild-type BAP1 or F170I-mutant were used as a template, then mixed with Supermixes for PCR and Real-Time PCR (BioRad) and TCEAL7-specific primers as well as GAPDH primers, and analyzed using the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). Real-time PCR was performed in triplicate for independent duplicated transfections with either wild-type (Wt) or F170I-mutant BAP1 and the results were analyzed using statistical procedures (SPSS ver.22.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Primers were used as previously reported.25

Results

Somatic point mutation coupled with monoallelic deletion of BAP1 gene in an esophageal squamous cell carcinoma among those that display frequent LOH at BAP1 locus

Among 49 patients with ESCC examined by direct sequencing, we identified a somatic non-synonymous mutation of BAP1 in an ESCC tumor. This mutation caused an amino acid substitution from phenylalanine to isoleucine at codon 170 (Fig.1a). MLPA analysis shows that this tumor lost the remaining allele of BAP1 as displayed in Figure1(b). These results revealed BAP1 alterations on both alleles of this tumor, which accounts for the biallelic inactivation of BAP1 gene. A faint peak observed in sequence data of this tumor likely represents contaminated residual non-cancerous DNA.
Figure 1

(a) BAP1 mutation in a patient with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. In tumor tissue, TTT, encoding phenylalanine, is altered to ATT, encoding isoleucine (arrowhead). A faint peak observed in sequence data of this tumor likely represents contaminated residual non-cancerous DNA, as indicated by MLPA analysis (b). (b) MLPA data for all 17 exons of BAP1 gene on 3p21.1 are displayed on the x-axis. The table in the (b) also displays peaks of eight control probes, and RASSF1 MYND10 HEX1 ROBO1 FHIT MITF RBM5 and MLH1 in the BAP1-neighboring region on chromosome 3p. Probe position and peak height in the (b) are described in SALSA MLPA probemix P417-B1 BAP1 (MRC Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Log2 ratio of MLPA data for each probe is indicated on the y-axis. (c) Schematic of BAP1 with the F170I mutation. UCH, HCF1, ULD and NLS stand for ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase domain, HCF1-binding domain, UCH37-like domain and nuclear localization signal, respectively. The F170I substitution is indicated by X. (d) Conservation of BAP1 in the region containing the F170I mutation. Alignment of amino acid sequences from codons 159–182 in human BAP1 and its counterparts in other species as identified by BLAST (http://www.genome.jp/tools/blast/). Codon 170 is boxed.

(a) BAP1 mutation in a patient with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. In tumor tissue, TTT, encoding phenylalanine, is altered to ATT, encoding isoleucine (arrowhead). A faint peak observed in sequence data of this tumor likely represents contaminated residual non-cancerous DNA, as indicated by MLPA analysis (b). (b) MLPA data for all 17 exons of BAP1 gene on 3p21.1 are displayed on the x-axis. The table in the (b) also displays peaks of eight control probes, and RASSF1 MYND10 HEX1 ROBO1 FHIT MITF RBM5 and MLH1 in the BAP1-neighboring region on chromosome 3p. Probe position and peak height in the (b) are described in SALSA MLPA probemix P417-B1 BAP1 (MRC Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Log2 ratio of MLPA data for each probe is indicated on the y-axis. (c) Schematic of BAP1 with the F170I mutation. UCH, HCF1, ULD and NLS stand for ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase domain, HCF1-binding domain, UCH37-like domain and nuclear localization signal, respectively. The F170I substitution is indicated by X. (d) Conservation of BAP1 in the region containing the F170I mutation. Alignment of amino acid sequences from codons 159–182 in human BAP1 and its counterparts in other species as identified by BLAST (http://www.genome.jp/tools/blast/). Codon 170 is boxed. Twenty-seven ESCC cases were examined by MLPA analysis and the results indicated that BAP1 locus was deleted as frequently as 52% (14 cases), as shown in Table1.

Non-synonymous genetic alteration found in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma induces depleted deubiquitinase activity and cytosolic localization of BAP1

As this codon is located in the UCH domain, and phenylalanine at codon 170 is highly conserved across species (Fig.1c,d), we evaluated its effect on the deubiquitinase activity of BAP1. We constructed FLAG-tagged wild-type BAP1 (FLAG-BAP1-Wt) and BAP1-F170I (FLAG-BAP1-F170I). Using an in vivo ubiquitination assay to measure the level of ubiquitinated host cell factor C1 (HCF1), quantified by densitometer as described above in independent triplicated experiments, we showed that deubiquitinase activity was significantly depleted in the F170I mutant compared with wild-type BAP1 (P < 0.05). The expression level of FLAG-BAP1-F170I was confirmed to be similar to that of FLAG-BAP1-Wt (Fig.2a,b).
Figure 2

(a) Deubiquitination of HCF1 by BAP1. Plasmids as described were transfected into HEK-293T cells. Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody, followed by western blot analysis with either anti-Myc or with anti-HA antibody. The expression level of HCF1 or BAP1 (wild-type or F170I mutant) was confirmed by western blot analyses with anti-HA or anti-FLAG antibody. (b) Statistical analysis in triplicate, ubiquitination of HCF1. Statistical significance is indicated by the asterisk (P < 0.05, Student's t-test). (c) Deubiquitination of BAP1. Plasmids were transfected into HEK-293T cells. Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-BAP1 antibody, followed by western blot analysis with either anti-Myc or anti-BAP1. (d) Statistical analysis in triplicate, ubiquitination of BAP1. Statistical significance is indicated by the double asterisk (P < 0.01, Student's t-test).

(a) Deubiquitination of HCF1 by BAP1. Plasmids as described were transfected into HEK-293T cells. Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody, followed by western blot analysis with either anti-Myc or with anti-HA antibody. The expression level of HCF1 or BAP1 (wild-type or F170I mutant) was confirmed by western blot analyses with anti-HA or anti-FLAG antibody. (b) Statistical analysis in triplicate, ubiquitination of HCF1. Statistical significance is indicated by the asterisk (P < 0.05, Student's t-test). (c) Deubiquitination of BAP1. Plasmids were transfected into HEK-293T cells. Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-BAP1 antibody, followed by western blot analysis with either anti-Myc or anti-BAP1. (d) Statistical analysis in triplicate, ubiquitination of BAP1. Statistical significance is indicated by the double asterisk (P < 0.01, Student's t-test). The reduced deubiquitination of HCF1 suggested that auto-deubiquitinated BAP1 might be decreased. Then ubiquitinated BAP1 was also evaluated by anti-BAP1 IP followed by anti-Myc western analysis (Fig.2c,d). Results obtained from triplicated experiments show that the level of ubiquitinated BAP1 significantly increased by F170I mutation (P < 0.01). Auto-deubiquitinated BAP1 likely localizes within the nucleus because of the deubiquitinated nuclear localization signals within this protein.5 Hence, we investigated the subcellular localization of wild-type BAP1 and the F170I mutant. We transfected U2OS cells with FLAG-BAP1-Wt or FLAG-BAP1-F170I and stained them with anti-FLAG antibody. We showed that F170I mutant preferentially localized within the cytoplasm, whereas wild-type BAP1 mostly localized within the nucleus (Fig.3).
Figure 3

Subcellular localization of wild-type BAP1 or F170I mutant. Exogenous BAP1, wild-type (Wt) or F170I mutant (F170I), was visualized by anti-FLAG antibody treatment, followed by incubation with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated antibody. A representative result is shown in (a). Exogenous BAP1 was more highly expressed in the nucleus (N > C), expressed equally between the nucleus and the cytoplasm (C = N), or expressed more highly in the cytoplasm (C > N). In each sample at least 200 cells were counted (b).

Subcellular localization of wild-type BAP1 or F170I mutant. Exogenous BAP1, wild-type (Wt) or F170I mutant (F170I), was visualized by anti-FLAG antibody treatment, followed by incubation with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated antibody. A representative result is shown in (a). Exogenous BAP1 was more highly expressed in the nucleus (N > C), expressed equally between the nucleus and the cytoplasm (C = N), or expressed more highly in the cytoplasm (C > N). In each sample at least 200 cells were counted (b).

F170I mutant alters gene expression profiles relating to oncogenic pathways

HCF1 is a nuclear transcription coregulator that may be involved in cell cycle control through transcription regulation. Less deubiquitinated HCF1 might lead to drastic changes in terms of transcriptional regulation.2 Therefore, we examined gene expression profiles by microarray analysis. As shown in Figure4(a), expression profiles were dramatically different between wild-type BAP1 and the F170I mutant; clustering analysis revealed that expression profiles could be classified into wild-type and the F170I mutant reproducibly in two independent transfections. This was confirmed by principal component analysis. Figure4(b) shows the results of heat map analysis of 5840 genes that were identified by the first component of the vector in principal component analysis, by adjusting the averaged value of all probes to 0. Table2 shows the results obtained for the 5840 genes selected above in gene-ontology analyses using four different programs. In general, this reproducibly contributed to the differentiation between wild-type BAP1 and the F170I mutant. Each result indicates that the expression of genes involved in oncogenic pathways was drastically altered by the expression of the F170I mutant compared with that of wild-type BAP1.
Figure 4

Heat map analyses of gene expression profiles. MT and WT stand for F170I mutant and wild-type BAP1, respectively. Expression profiles were examined in two independent transfections, 1 or 2 (a). A total of 5840 genes, selected by principal component analysis from the values of the first component of the vector, excluding genes without genome annotation, were used for heat map analysis by adjusting the average expression level of each gene to 0 (b).

Table 2

Molecular pathways differentially induced by the F170I mutant

IPA canonical pathwaysDAVID KEGGDAVID BiocartsDAVID Reactome
Pathway-log(P-value)PathwayP-valuePathwayP-valuePathwayP-value
Molecular mechanisms of cancer1.32E+01Lysosome1.70E-06IL 6 signaling pathway9.50E-03Metabolism of proteins3.00E-08
Ephrin-B signaling9.33E+00Colorectal cancer4.30E-04Integrin signaling pathway9.70E-03Signalling by NGF8.10E-07
Ephrin receptor signaling8.37E+00Ribosome4.40E-04NFAT and hypertrophy of the heart (transcription in the broken heart)1.10E-023′ -UTR-mediated translational regulation1.60E-05
PI3K/AKT signaling8.19E+00Insulin signaling pathway4.80E-04Glycolysis pathway2.00E-02Diabetes pathways1.60E-05
Germ cell–sertoli cell junction signaling7.92E+00Adherens junction1.50E-03HIV-I Nef2.20E-02Gene Expression4.90E-05
EIF2 signaling7.66E+00N-Glycan biosynthesis1.70E-03Links between Pyk2 and map kinases2.30E-02Influenza Infection5.70E-05
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma signaling7.35E+00Pathways in cancer2.00E-03Trefoil factors initiate mucosal healing3.60E-02HIV Infection3.30E-04
TGF-beta signaling6.86E+00Focal adhesion4.00E-03TGF beta signaling pathway3.80E-02Integration of energy metabolism3.30E-04
Axonal guidance signaling6.37E+00Chronic myeloid leukemia4.10E-03IL-2 receptor beta chain in T cell activation3.90E-02Signaling by TGF beta1.30E-03
Epithelial adherens junction signaling6.33E+00Wnt signaling pathway5.20E-03Regulation of transcriptional activity by PML4.70E-02Apoptosis1.50E-03
Sertoli cell–sertoli cell junction signaling6.21E+00p53 signaling pathway6.60E-03MAPKinase signaling pathway4.90E-02Signaling by Wnt2.10E-03
Wnt/beta-catenin signaling6.13E+00RNA polymerase7.20E-03Signaling by EGFR2.20E-03
Chronic myeloid leukemia signaling6.04E+00Small cell lung cancer7.90E-03Telomere Maintenance1.30E-02
Breast cancer regulation by stathmin 15.97E+00Axon guidance9.30E-03Signaling by Insulin receptor1.60E-02
Cell cycle: G1/S checkpoint regulation5.90E+00Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism1.30E-02Transcription1.80E-02
Remodeling of epithelial adherens junctions5.86E+00TGF-beta signaling pathway1.40E-02Pausing and recovery of elongation2.00E-02
Cyclins and cell cycle regulation5.84E+00Pancreatic cancer1.60E-02Elongation arrest and recovery2.00E-02
14-3-3-mediated signaling5.49E+00MAPK signaling pathway1.80E-02HIV-1 elongation arrest and recovery2.00E-02
ERK/MAPK signaling5.46E+00Alzheimer's disease1.80E-02Pausing and recovery of HIV-1 elongation2.00E-02
Regulation of eIF4 and p70S6K signaling5.36E+00Neurotrophin signaling pathway1.90E-02Metabolism of carbohydrates2.50E-02
Androgen signaling5.31E+00Epithelial cell signaling in Helicobacter pylori infection2.50E-02Membrane Trafficking2.70E-02
ILK signaling5.23E+00RNA degradation3.30E-02Pausing and recovery of Tat-mediated HIV-1 elongation3.50E-02
IGF-1 signaling5.17E+00Pathogenic Escherichia coli infection3.30E-02Tat-mediated HIV-1 elongation arrest and recovery3.50E-02
PTEN signaling5.10E+00Non-small cell lung cancer3.40E-02Signaling by Notch3.90E-02
CDK5 signaling5.10E+00Prostate cancer3.50E-02Signal attenuation4.60E-02
Prostate cancer signaling4.91E+00Acute myeloid leukemia4.10E-02
mTOR signaling4.88E+00Endometrial cancer4.30E-02
Pyridoxal 5′-phosphate salvage pathway4.84E+00Glycosylphosphatidylinositol(GPI)-anchor biosynthesis4.70E-02
Integrin signaling4.67E+00
Protein ubiquitination pathway4.65E+00
Mouse embryonic stem cell pluripotency4.59E+00
Insulin receptor signaling4.55E+00
Mitochondrial dysfunction4.43E+00
Non-small cell lung cancer signaling4.35E+00
Cardiac hypertrophy signaling4.26E+00
Regulation of the epithelial–mesenchymal transition pathway4.23E+00
Amyloid processing4.16E+00
Acute myeloid leukemia signaling4.00E+00
Small cell lung cancer signaling3.95E+00
Colanic acid building blocks biosynthesis3.94E+00
Actin cytoskeleton signaling3.93E+00
Telomerase signaling3.90E+00
Salvage pathways of pyrimidine ribonucleotides3.82E+00
Phosphatidylglycerol biosynthesis II (non-plastidic)3.71E+00
IL-1 signaling3.67E+00
Myc mediated apoptosis signaling3.55E+00
Role of CHK proteins in cell cycle checkpoint control3.53E+00
Endometrial cancer signaling3.51E+00
CTLA4 signaling in cytotoxic T lymphocytes3.48E+00
Clathrin-mediated endocytosis signaling3.38E+00

Note: Pathways with P < 0.05 are listed except for the ingenuity pathways analysis (IPA) pathways, for which the top 50 pathways are listed.

Molecular pathways differentially induced by the F170I mutant Note: Pathways with P < 0.05 are listed except for the ingenuity pathways analysis (IPA) pathways, for which the top 50 pathways are listed. Heat map analyses of gene expression profiles. MT and WT stand for F170I mutant and wild-type BAP1, respectively. Expression profiles were examined in two independent transfections, 1 or 2 (a). A total of 5840 genes, selected by principal component analysis from the values of the first component of the vector, excluding genes without genome annotation, were used for heat map analysis by adjusting the average expression level of each gene to 0 (b).

Nuclear BAP1 expression is lacking in 44% of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

We found that nuclear BAP1 expression was absent in 23 out of 52 (44%) ESCCs examined by immunohistochemistry (Fig.5a,b). Interestingly, 8 of these displayed strong cytosolic expression of BAP1 (Fig.5c). The BAP1-nuclear negative tumors more likely lost the BAP1 locus by CNV analysis than the BAP1-nuclear positive tumors; BAP1-nuclear negative tumors were found in 22% (2/9) of no-CNV tumors versus 67% (4/6) in BAP1-deleted tumors (Table1).
Figure 5

Immunohistochemical staining of BAP1 in surgically resected esophageal cancer tissues. Representative features are shown, under low magnification (upper; bar 50 μm) and high magnification (lower; bar 20 μm). We classified (a) as BAP1 negative, (b) as BAP1-positive. In eight nuclear BAP1-negative cases, BAP1 was strongly expressed within the cytoplasm (c).

Immunohistochemical staining of BAP1 in surgically resected esophageal cancer tissues. Representative features are shown, under low magnification (upper; bar 50 μm) and high magnification (lower; bar 20 μm). We classified (a) as BAP1 negative, (b) as BAP1-positive. In eight nuclear BAP1-negative cases, BAP1 was strongly expressed within the cytoplasm (c).

A putative tumor suppressor, TCEAL7, is significantly induced by wild-type BAP1

Among multiple genes involved in oncogenic pathways, as shown in Table2, we could confirm that the expression level of TCEAL7 was significantly induced in wild-type BAP1-transfected HEK-293T cells as compared to F170I mutant transfected HEK-293T cells (Fig.6).
Figure 6

Result of quantitative RT-PCR for TCEAL7 expression in wild-type BAP1 or F170I mutant BAP1-transfected HEK-293T cells. RT-PCR was repeated in triplicate for duplicated transfections. Each asterisk indicates statistical significance (P < 0.001). TF1, TF2 and NS stand for transfection 1, transfection 2 and no statistical significance (P = 1.0 between TF1 and TF2 by F170I; P = 0.43 between TF1 and TF2 by Wt), respectively.

Result of quantitative RT-PCR for TCEAL7 expression in wild-type BAP1 or F170I mutant BAP1-transfected HEK-293T cells. RT-PCR was repeated in triplicate for duplicated transfections. Each asterisk indicates statistical significance (P < 0.001). TF1, TF2 and NS stand for transfection 1, transfection 2 and no statistical significance (P = 1.0 between TF1 and TF2 by F170I; P = 0.43 between TF1 and TF2 by Wt), respectively.

Discussion

In the current study, we showed that BAP1, which is located on chromosome 3p21.3, was somatically altered in 1 tumor of 49 ESCCs examined, in which monoallelic deletion of BAP1 gene was also detected by MLPA (Fig.1). Furthermore, our results suggested that BAP1 might be functionally inactivated in 44% of ESCC by IHC analysis, because BAP1 has been reported to function within the nucleus and BAP1 was not expressed within the nucleus in 44% of ESCCs.3–5 Besides, the results of MLPA analysis showed that the monoallelic loss (LOH) of BAP1 occurred as frequently as 52% in ESCC (Fig.1b and Table1). As MLPA was reported to be accurate compared to array CGH, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and gene copy number assay,26 the results obtained in the current study suggested that the BAP1 gene and/or nearby genes are involved in the esophageal tumorigenesis. This view may be supported by our other results; these figures for BAP1-nuclear negative tumors and BAP1 deletion are comparable and BAP1-nuclear negative tumors likely lost allele at BAP1 locus more than BAP1-nuclear positive tumors. As ESCC is one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide, many genome analyses have been reported. Several genes that are mutated in ESCC have been described, including TP53 CDKN2A NOTCH1 and NFE2L2.27–30 The role of BAP1 in esophageal carcinogenesis remains unclear; BAP1 mutation was not reported in 71 cases of ESCC examined by Song et al.,31 although two frameshift mutations in 113 cases were reported by Gao et al.32 In the catalogue of genetic mutation in human cancer (the COSMIC database; http://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cancergenome/projects/cosmic/), BAP1 somatic mutation is reported in only one ESCC. Consistently, in the current study, we observed BAP1 mutation in only 1 case of 49 examined. However, although it is rare, we believe that the somatic mutation of BAP1 is a driver mutation of ESCC, at least in some cases, including the current one. This is because of our functional data that suggested the biallelic alteration of BAP1 (Fig.1a,b), the displayed less deubiquitinase and auto-deubiquitinase activities (Fig.2), a cytoplasmic localization (Fig.3) and frequent nuclear BAP1-negative expressions in the esophageal cancers (Table1). Besides, gene expression profiles in oncogenic pathways were markedly different between wild-type BAP1 and the F170I mutant (Fig.4, Table2). Furthermore, although F170I substitution has not been reported previously, F170V and F170L substitutions were reported in renal cell carcinomas in the COSMIC database and by Pena-Llops et al.9 These results could support the view that amino acid substitution at codon 170 can be pathogenic. This is consistent with the fact that phenylalanine at codon 170 is highly conserved across species (Fig.1d). As described above, somatic mutation of the coding region of BAP1 is rare in ESCC. However, our MLPA and IHC analyses revealed that the BAP1 locus was deleted in ESCC as frequently as 52% and that nuclear expression of BAP1 was depleted in 44% of ESCC. Interestingly, 15 tumors out of 23 with depleted nuclear expression of BAP1 displayed no cytoplasmic expression (Table1), consistent with previous IHC studies in melanoma,14,24 while the remaining 8 cases showed strong cytoplasmic expression of BAP1 instead (Fig.5c). Recent IHC analysis showed that perinuclear localization of BAP1 is also observed in nuclear BAP1-negative sporadic epithelioid Spitz tumors; in that study, authors predicted that BAP1 in those tumors might result in the inability to be transported to the nucleus, trapped in the Golgi zone, which leads to an inability to perform its normal tumor suppressor function.33 As previous studies suggest, BAP1 absent tumors, both in the nucleus and the cytoplasm, may harbor biallelic loss or somatic mutation with LOH of BAP1.24,34 However, the current study, we could not detect any somatic mutations in nuclear BAP1-negative ESCC in Table1. This suggests that BAP1 may be inactivated mainly by pathways other than somatic mutation in nuclear BAP1-negative tumors. Gene deletion at large might explain these cases, as supported by the evidence in the current study (Table1). Alternatively, UBE2O, which has been reported to suppress its function by recruiting BAP1 to the cytosol,5 is mutated in ESCC and in other esophageal carcinomas (see COSMIC data base).31 It is possible that altered UBE2O behaves as an oncoprotein like activated EGFR or RAS family proteins. Therefore, BAP1 may be functionally inactivated in these cases with alterations of UBE2O or other genes involved in BAP1 ubiquitination, specifically in nuclear BAP1-negative but cytosolic positive tumors. The detailed mechanism of carcinogenesis by BAP1-negative tumor has not been disclosed so far, but we could show one candidate in downstream of BAP1 by the current study: wild-type BAP1 significantly induces TCEAL7 expression more than F170I mutant BAP1 (Fig.6). TCEAL7, transcription elongation factor A-like 7, has been reported to induce apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells,35 to negatively regulate Myc activity,26,36 to suppress nuclear factor (NF)-κB binding to its target DNA sequences37 and to induce p27 expression,38 suggesting that TCEAL7 behaves as a tumor suppressor. Thus, BAP1 may play a key role in at least a part of esophageal carcinogenesis, not only by somatic mutation or gene deletion, but also by functional inactivation, such as by depleted deubiquitination or by cytoplasmic sequestration. Although further analysis is needed, BAP1 may be a useful therapeutic target in ESCC.
  38 in total

1.  Frequent mutation of the p53 gene in human esophageal cancer.

Authors:  M C Hollstein; R A Metcalf; J A Welsh; R Montesano; C C Harris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Linkage of the ubiquitin-conjugating system and the endocytic pathway in ligand-induced internalization of the growth hormone receptor.

Authors:  R Govers; P van Kerkhof; A L Schwartz; G J Strous
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Cellular responses and repair of single-strand breaks introduced by UV damage endonuclease in mammalian cells.

Authors:  S Okano; S Kanno; S Nakajima; A Yasui
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Accumulation of genetic alterations during esophageal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  T Mori; A Yanagisawa; Y Kato; K Miura; T Nishihira; S Mori; Y Nakamura
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Clumped perinuclear BAP1 expression is a frequent finding in sporadic epithelioid Spitz tumors.

Authors:  Bryan Gammon; Tom N Traczyk; Pedram Gerami
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.587

6.  Frequent somatic mutation of the MTS1/CDK4I (multiple tumor suppressor/cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor) gene in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  T Mori; K Miura; T Aoki; T Nishihira; S Mori; Y Nakamura
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in tumor diagnostics and prognostics.

Authors:  Cornelia Hömig-Hölzel; Suvi Savola
Journal:  Diagn Mol Pathol       Date:  2012-12

8.  Exome sequencing identifies frequent inactivating mutations in BAP1, ARID1A and PBRM1 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.

Authors:  Yuchen Jiao; Timothy M Pawlik; Robert A Anders; Florin M Selaru; Mirte M Streppel; Donald J Lucas; Noushin Niknafs; Violeta Beleva Guthrie; Anirban Maitra; Pedram Argani; G Johan A Offerhaus; Juan Carlos Roa; Lewis R Roberts; Gregory J Gores; Irinel Popescu; Sorin T Alexandrescu; Simona Dima; Matteo Fassan; Michele Simbolo; Andrea Mafficini; Paola Capelli; Rita T Lawlor; Andrea Ruzzenente; Alfredo Guglielmi; Giampaolo Tortora; Filippo de Braud; Aldo Scarpa; William Jarnagin; David Klimstra; Rachel Karchin; Victor E Velculescu; Ralph H Hruban; Bert Vogelstein; Kenneth W Kinzler; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Laura D Wood
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-11-03       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Allelotype study of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  T Aoki; T Mori; X Du; T Nisihira; T Matsubara; Y Nakamura
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  BAP1 cancer syndrome: malignant mesothelioma, uveal and cutaneous melanoma, and MBAITs.

Authors:  Michele Carbone; Laura Korb Ferris; Francine Baumann; Andrea Napolitano; Christopher A Lum; Erin G Flores; Giovanni Gaudino; Amy Powers; Peter Bryant-Greenwood; Thomas Krausz; Elizabeth Hyjek; Rachael Tate; Joseph Friedberg; Tracey Weigel; Harvey I Pass; Haining Yang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 5.531

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Mesothelioma: recent highlights.

Authors:  Michele Carbone; Haining Yang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

2.  Extranodal extension of nodal metastasis is the main prognostic moderator in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Claudio Luchini; Nicola Veronese
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Somatic BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) loss is an early and rare event in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Heike Loeser; Dirk Waldschmidt; Fabian Kuetting; Simon Schallenberg; Thomas Zander; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Arnulf Hoelscher; Katharina Weckermann; Patrick Plum; Hakan Alakus; Reinhard Buettner; Alexander Quaas
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-08

4.  Recurrent genetic alterations and biomarker expression in primary and metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the vulva.

Authors:  Deyin Xing; Yuehua Liu; Hyeon Jin Park; Inji Baek; Hung Tran; Gloria Cheang; Jorge Novo; Jessica Dillon; Andres Matoso; Emily Farmer; Max A Cheng; Ya-Chea Tsai; Kara Lombardo; Michael G Conner; Russell Vang; Chien-Fu Hung; Tzyy-Choou Wu; Wei Song
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 5.  Molecular events in the pathogenesis of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Deyin Xing; Oluwole Fadare
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Germline BAP1 mutations induce a Warburg effect.

Authors:  Angela Bononi; Haining Yang; Carlotta Giorgi; Simone Patergnani; Laura Pellegrini; Mingming Su; Guoxiang Xie; Valentina Signorato; Sandra Pastorino; Paul Morris; Greg Sakamoto; Shafi Kuchay; Giovanni Gaudino; Harvey I Pass; Andrea Napolitano; Paolo Pinton; Wei Jia; Michele Carbone
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 7.  Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolases and Human Malignancies: The Novel Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications for Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Chao Rong; Ran Zhou; Shan Wan; Dan Su; Shou-Li Wang; Jochen Hess
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  BAP1 Status Determines the Sensitivity of Malignant Mesothelioma Cells to Gemcitabine Treatment.

Authors:  Alice Guazzelli; Parisa Meysami; Emyr Bakker; Constantinos Demonacos; Antonio Giordano; Marija Krstic-Demonacos; Luciano Mutti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-01-19       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Nuclear up regulation of the BRCA1-associated ubiquitinase BAP1 is associated with tumor aggressiveness in prostate cancers lacking the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion.

Authors:  Stefan Steurer; Lara Schwemmer; Claudia Hube-Magg; Franziska Büscheck; Doris Höflmayer; Maria Christina Tsourlakis; Till S Clauditz; Andreas M Luebke; Ronald Simon; Guido Sauter; Jakob Izbicki; Cornelia Schroeder; Thorsten Schlomm; Hartwig Huland; Hans Heinzer; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Cosima Göbel; Sören Weidemann; Patrick Lebok; David Dum; Christoph Fraune; Sarah Minner; Jan Meiners
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2019-12-24

10.  Functional characterisation guides classification of novel BAP1 germline variants.

Authors:  Jing Han Hong; Siao Ting Chong; Po-Hsien Lee; Jing Tan; Hong Lee Heng; Nur Diana Binte Ishak; Sock Hoai Chan; Bin Tean Teh; Joanne Ngeow
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 8.617

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.