Literature DB >> 26078729

Fecal DNA-Based Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia.

D Kim Turgeon, Dean E Brenner.   

Abstract

Human DNA fragments, as well a as whole colonocytes, can be found in stool and interrogated for mutations associated with carcinogenesis. Multiplexed panels of point mutations in fecal DNA improved the sensitivity of cancer detection (51.6%; 95% CI, 34.8%-68%) compared with fecal occult blood testing (12.9%; 95% CI, 5.1-28.9). However, the multiplex panels are not more sensitive than fecal occult blood testing in detecting advanced adenomas. Markers of epigenetic events, such as DNA methylation of gene promoters in genes not previously known to be associated with carcinogenesis or colorectal cancer, have recently been shown to be potential markers for early detection. Future approaches to improve sensitivity of fecal DNA detection of colorectal adenocarcinoma may require the inclusion of epigenetic biomarkers, the use of colonocytes isolated from feces, or both.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 26078729      PMCID: PMC4465177          DOI: 10.1007/s11888-007-0027-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep        ISSN: 1556-3790


  30 in total

1.  Digital PCR.

Authors:  B Vogelstein; K W Kinzler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Role of integrins in cell invasion and migration.

Authors:  John D Hood; David A Cheresh
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  Gastrointestinal epithelial renewal.

Authors:  G L Eastwood
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Mutations of the p53 gene in the stool of patients with resectable colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S Eguchi; N Kohara; K Komuta; T Kanematsu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Detecting colorectal cancer in stool with the use of multiple genetic targets.

Authors:  S M Dong; G Traverso; C Johnson; L Geng; R Favis; K Boynton; K Hibi; S N Goodman; M D'Allessio; P Paty; S R Hamilton; D Sidransky; F Barany; B Levin; A Shuber; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein; J Jen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer screening: prospects for molecular stool analysis.

Authors:  R Justin Davies; Richard Miller; Nicholas Coleman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; E Y Rahmani; J H Haseman; G T Lemmel; S Kaster; J S Buckley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Fecal DNA testing compared with conventional colorectal cancer screening methods: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth Song; A Mark Fendrick; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Colorectal cancer screening using stool DNA analysis in clinical practice: early clinical experience with respect to patient acceptance and colonoscopic follow-up of abnormal tests.

Authors:  Barry M Berger; Paul C Schroy; Jennifer L Rosenberg; Myla Lai-Goldman; Marcia Eisenberg; Trisha Brown; Robert B Rochelle; Paul R Billings
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.481

10.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening with stool DNA testing in intermediate-incidence countries.

Authors:  Grace Hui-Min Wu; Yi-Ming Wang; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Jau-Min Wong; Hsin-Chih Lai; Jane Warwick; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.